nep-lab New Economics Papers
on Labour Economics
Issue of 2005‒08‒03
two papers chosen by
Stephanie Lluis
University of Minesota

  1. Capital humano: uma nova proxy para incluir aspectos qualitativos By Luciano Nakabashi; Lízia de Figueiredo
  2. Migration and technological change in rural households: complemen ts or substitutes? By Mariapia MENDOLA

  1. By: Luciano Nakabashi (Cedeplar-UFMG); Lízia de Figueiredo (Cedeplar-UFMG)
    Abstract: The role of human capital on the development process has been recognized as a crucial element by many researchers. Nevertheless, many empirical results have showed no correlation between human capital and income per capita level or between human capital and growth rates. It is argued that the interaction between the two variables is more complicated than predicted by endogenous model of growth as the one developed by Lucas-Uzawa. Other problem that is usually mentioned is the proxy´s lack of quality because it does not take into account the disparities in the educational system when different nations are compared. The main goal of this paper is to employ a proxy for human capital that tries to take into account this characteristic and compare with Mankiw, Romer and Weil 1992’s results.
    Keywords: Human capital, empirical results, new proxy
    JEL: C21 E10 I20 O11 O41 O50
    Date: 2005–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cdp:texdis:td270&r=lab
  2. By: Mariapia MENDOLA
    Abstract: In this paper we study the interrelationship between determinants of migration, conceived as a family strategy, and the potential impact of having a migrant household member on people left behind . Labour migration is often related to poverty but given its lump y-investment nature, poverty may constitute a motivation to migra te as well as a constraint to do it. We use cross-sectional house hold data from two rural regions of Bangladesh to test whether mi gration is a form of income diversification strategy that signifi cantly influences the risk-taking behaviour of source farm househ olds in agricultural activities. We account for heterogeneity of migration constraints differentiating between domestic (temporary and permanent) and international moving destinations. We find th at richer and large-holder households are more likely to particip ate in costly high-return migration (i.e. international migration ) and employ modern technologies, thereby achieving higher produc tivity. Poorer households, on the other hand, are not able to ove rcome entry costs of moving abroad and fall back on migration wit h low entry costs, and low returns (i.e. domestic migration); the latter does not help them to achieve production enhancements and may act as a poverty-trap locking households into persistent pov erty.
    Keywords: Internal and International Migration, Farm Household Behaviour, Agricultural Production Choices.
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:mil:wpdepa:2005-15&r=lab

This nep-lab issue is ©2005 by Stephanie Lluis. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.