nep-knm New Economics Papers
on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Economy
Issue of 2024‒02‒26
three papers chosen by
Laura Nicola-Gavrila, Centrul European de Studii Manageriale în Administrarea Afacerilor


  1. Green Technological Diversification: The Role of International Linkages in Leaders, Followers and Catching-Up Countries By Nicoletta Corrocher; Simone Maria Grabner; Andrea Morrison
  2. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor versus Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics: comparing their intellectual structures By Antonio Rafael Ramos-Rodriguez; Salustiano Martinez-Fierro; Jose Aurelio Medina-Garrido; Jose Ruiz-Navarro
  3. Economic Growth through Basic Research by Firms: A science linkage approach By NIREI Makoto; OIKAWA Koki; OROKU Masahiro

  1. By: Nicoletta Corrocher; Simone Maria Grabner; Andrea Morrison
    Abstract: To promote a more environmentally sustainable economy, countries need to broaden their innovation activities to include green technologies. In this process, the increasing global interconnectedness and internationalisation of innovative activities underlines the growing importance of external knowledge linkages. This paper examines how different categories of countries - technological leaders, catching-up countries and follower countries - diversify into green technologies by exploiting different types of external linkages through co-inventions with international partners. The dataset covers 49 countries over a period of 40 years. The results show that it is complementary linkages, rather than external linkages alone, that facilitate related diversification in the green sector. Moreover, while complementary linkages have a significant impact on the ability of catching-up countries and followers to diversify into less complex and widely diffused green technologies, the diversification pattern of leaders is more oriented towards complex technologies in their early stages. Therefore, green technology development policies should actively promote international cooperation as it has the potential to catalyse green catching-up and foster sustainable growth.
    Keywords: technological diversification, green technologies, co-inventor linkages, relatedness, catching-up
    JEL: O33 Q55
    Date: 2024–02
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:egu:wpaper:2404&r=knm
  2. By: Antonio Rafael Ramos-Rodriguez; Salustiano Martinez-Fierro; Jose Aurelio Medina-Garrido; Jose Ruiz-Navarro
    Abstract: In the past 15 years, two international observatories have been intensively studying entrepreneurship using empirical studies with different methodologies: GEM and PSED. Both projects have generated a considerable volume of scientific production, and their intellectual structures are worth analyzing. The current work is an exploratory study of the knowledge base of the articles generated by each of these two observatories and published in prestigious journals. The value added of this work lies in its novel characterization of the intellectual structure of entrepreneurship according to the academic production of these two initiatives. The results may be of interest to the managers and members of these observatories, as well as to academics, researchers, sponsors and policymakers interested in entrepreneurship.
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2401.13684&r=knm
  3. By: NIREI Makoto; OIKAWA Koki; OROKU Masahiro
    Abstract: Patents applied by private firms occasionally cite scientific papers. We regard these citations as a signal that the research project of the applying firms involves basic research, and examine the relationship between basic research and firm performance. Firms conducting basic research are more likely to earn higher profit margins, while no monotonic relationship is observed between basic research and sales size. We then construct an endogenous growth model incorporating the basic research investment by heterogeneous firms. Firms' decisions regarding basic research depend on firm size, the necessity for basic research for developing their products, and the degree of knowledge spillover from external basic research results. Quantitative analysis using this model reveals how basic research spillover effects impact economic growth, and how declining R&D efficiency, which has been reported in the literature in recent years, leads to lower growth. Furthermore, we compare public basic research investment with basic research subsidies and demonstrate that the latter is more efficient as a growth policy.
    Date: 2024–02
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:eti:dpaper:24013&r=knm

This nep-knm issue is ©2024 by Laura Nicola-Gavrila. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.