nep-knm New Economics Papers
on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Economy
Issue of 2022‒05‒16
four papers chosen by
Laura Nicola-Gavrila
Centrul European de Studii Manageriale în Administrarea Afacerilor

  1. The Export of High Knowledge Intensity Services of European Countries By LEOGRANDE, ANGELO
  2. Research management models to promote breakthrough innovation: analyzing success case stories of simultaneous discovery-invention research processes. By Jean-Alain Héraud; Nathalie Popiolek
  3. The Education-Innovation Gap By Barbara Biasi; Song Ma
  4. The rule of law and investment in intangible capital: Evidence for the EU-16, 1996-2017 By Roth, Felix

  1. By: LEOGRANDE, ANGELO
    Abstract: The European Innovation Scoreboard-EIS calculates the export value of knowledge-intensive services produced in Europe. By knowledge-intensive services we mean a set of activities ranging from sea and air transport to financial services, the use of intellectual property, telecommunications, and audiovisual services. The value is considered as a percentage ratio with respect to the complex value of the exports of services.
    Keywords: Innovation, and Invention: Processes and Incentives; Management of Technological Innovation and R&D; Diffusion Processes; Open Innovation.
    JEL: O3 O30 O31 O32 O33 O34
    Date: 2022–04–18
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:112795&r=
  2. By: Jean-Alain Héraud; Nathalie Popiolek
    Abstract: Economic innovations are not systematically triggered by scientific discoveries or technological inventions. They can benefit from a new scientific idea without really depending on it as a key element. For instance, incremental innovations almost by definition do not exploit a new techno-scientific paradigm. Moreover, some very creative ideas happen to arise in other fields than science or technology, like the domain of usage. Nevertheless, scientific discoveries and breakthrough innovations, during the 20th and 21th centuries, were often linked. We wish to check here the existence of cross-fertilization mechanisms between academic and industrial researches in specific cases of high creativity level, and try to describe the simultaneous discovery-innovation process taking place at such occasions. We base our study on historical examples and a series of interviews of actors from public research organizations as well as industrial R&D departments. We learnt a lot about the various dimensions of the knowledge co-creation, but also about the difficulties to overcome in such cooperative schemes: differences in individual and institutional motivations, in the perception of science (its raison d’être, its ownership), of risk, and of time (unsynchronized clocks).
    Keywords: Discovery, Radical innovation, Academy - industry partnerships, Models of innovation.
    JEL: O31 O32
    Date: 2022
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2022-12&r=
  3. By: Barbara Biasi; Song Ma
    Abstract: This paper documents differences across higher-education courses in the coverage of frontier knowledge. Comparing the text of 1.7M syllabi and 20M academic articles, we construct the “education-innovation gap,” a syllabus’s relative proximity to old and new knowledge. We show that courses differ greatly in the extent to which they cover frontier knowledge. More selective and better funded schools, and those enrolling socio-economically advantaged students, teach more frontier knowledge. Instructors play a big role in shaping course content; research-active instructors teach more frontier knowledge. Students from schools teaching more frontier knowledge are more likely to complete a PhD, produce more patents, and earn more after graduation.
    Keywords: education, innovation, syllabi, instructors, text analysis, inequality
    JEL: I23 I24 I26 J24 O33
    Date: 2022
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ces:ceswps:_9653&r=
  4. By: Roth, Felix
    Abstract: This paper analyses the relationship between the rule of law (RoL) and intangible capital investment by businesses within a sample of 16 European countries, over the period from 1996 to 2017. Studies on the effects of RoL on intangible capital investment are scarce, hence, the relevance of empirical research in this area. When controlling for endogeneity, the study found a coefficient of 2.0 for the relationship between RoL and investment in intangibles, confirming the significant and positive relationship between the two and highlighting RoL as a driving factor of investment in intangibles and, hence, labour productivity growth in the EU-16.
    Keywords: rule of law (RoL),intangible capital investment,labour productivity growth,European Union (EU)
    JEL: E02 E22 O34 O43 O52 P14
    Date: 2022
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:uhhhdp:12&r=

This nep-knm issue is ©2022 by Laura Nicola-Gavrila. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.