nep-knm New Economics Papers
on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Economy
Issue of 2013‒02‒16
eight papers chosen by
Laura Stefanescu
European Research Centre of Managerial Studies in Business Administration

  1. Micro-dynamics of knowledge: actors, processes and territorial organization By Simone Strambach
  2. Impact of external knowledge acquisition strategies on innovation – A comparative study based on Dutch and Swiss panel data By Spyros Arvanitis; Martin Wörter; Pierre Mohnen; Boris Lokshin
  3. Knowledge Systematisation and the Development of a By Beatrice D'Ippoloto; Marcela Miozzo; Davide Consoli
  4. Remote Collaboration, Absorptive Capacity, and the Innovative Output of High-tech Small Firms By Luca Berchicci; Jeroen P.J. de Jong; Mark Freel
  5. Universities, Public Research and Regional Innovation Output: An Empirical Study of 19 Technologies in Germany By Thomas Brenner; Charlotte Schlump
  6. Productivity, innovation and growth in Sri Lanka : an empirical investigation By Dutz, Mark A.; O'Connell, Stephen D.
  7. Analiza eficienţei activităţii de cercetare dezvoltare inovare prin metoda DEA By Roman, Monica; Suciu, Christina
  8. Behind the Scenes: Sources of Complementarity in R&D By Marco Ceccagnoli; Matthew J. Higgins; Vincenzo Palermo

  1. By: Simone Strambach (Philipps-Universität Marburg)
    Abstract: By applying the evolutionary economic geography approach and focusing on the organizational dimension of the knowledge-based theory of the firm the paper intends to make both a conceptual and an empirical contribution to understand the ways in which knowledge dynamics unfold in time and space and lead to innovative change. The article focuses on the connections of cumulative and combinatorial knowledge dynamics at the micro level of firms and other organizations. The empirical results base on the quantitative and qualitative meta-analysis of case studies in Europe that were obtained by the instrument of innovation biographies.
    Keywords: Micro-dynamics of Knowledge, Innovation, Institution, territorial Organization
    JEL: D83 O4 O31 O32 R11
    Date: 2013–02–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pum:wpaper:2013-01&r=knm
  2. By: Spyros Arvanitis (KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich, Switzerland); Martin Wörter (KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich, Switzerland); Pierre Mohnen (Maastricht University); Boris Lokshin (Maastricht University)
    Abstract: There is growing evidence that firms increasingly adopt open innovation practices. In this paper we investigate the impact of two such external knowledge acquisition strategies, ‘buy’ and ‘cooperate’, on firm’s product innovation performance. Taking a direct (productivity) approach, we test for complementarity effects in the simultaneous use of the two strategies, and in the intensity of their use. Our results based on large panels of Dutch and Swiss innovating firms, suggest that while both ‘buy’ and ‘cooperate’ have a positive effect on innovation, there is little statistical evidence that using them simultaneously leads to higher innovation performance. Results from the Dutch sample provide some indication, that there are positive economies of scope in doing external and cooperative R&D simultaneously conditional on doing internal R&D.
    Keywords: Open innovation, R&D collaboration, make, buy strategies
    JEL: O31 O32
    Date: 2013–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:kof:wpskof:13-325&r=knm
  3. By: Beatrice D'Ippoloto; Marcela Miozzo; Davide Consoli
    Abstract: Drawing on evidence on the home furnishing sectors in Italy during the XX century, the aim is to understand the instituted processes that facilitated the translation of design know-how from being project-specific to becoming relevant to broader remits. The paper contributes to the debate on industry evolution by incorporating the institutional dimension to the organisational and technological changes taking place at both firm and industry level.
    Keywords: Design; Knowledge Systematisation; Industry Evolution; Routines; Capabilities; Home Furnishing
    Date: 2013
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:aal:abbswp:13-06&r=knm
  4. By: Luca Berchicci; Jeroen P.J. de Jong; Mark Freel
    Abstract: It is generally recognized that firms’ innovative performance can be enhanced by collaborating with remote partners. However, remote collaborations are not without challenges, as geographical distance may frustrate tacit knowledge transfer and inter-organizational learning. We investigate the moderating role of absorptive capacity by proposing that the higher firms’ R&D intensity, the stronger the relationship between remote collaboration and their share of new product revenues. Drawing on survey data of 250 Dutch high-tech small firms, it is confirmed that remote collaboration is associated with innovative performance, but at low values of R&D intensity this relationship disappears.
    Date: 2013
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:aal:abbswp:13-01&r=knm
  5. By: Thomas Brenner (Philipps-Universität Marburg); Charlotte Schlump (Philipps-Universität Marburg)
    Abstract: It has been repeatedly shown that universities and public research institutes contribute to local innovation generation and facilitation. The mechanisms behind this contribution are well discussed in the literature. However, detailed empirical examinations are missing. We analyse the impact of universities and public research on regional innovation output. Thereby we analyse separately 19 technologies and distinguish whether university education and public research are rather innovation generators or innovation facilitators. All analyses are conducted on German data.
    Keywords: regional innovation systems, innovation output, university, public research
    JEL: C13 I25 O31 R12
    Date: 2013–02–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pum:wpaper:2013-03&r=knm
  6. By: Dutz, Mark A.; O'Connell, Stephen D.
    Abstract: This study investigates the impact of key business environment indicators on productivity, innovation, and growth in Sri Lanka through a cluster-level productivity analysis, a firm-level total factor productivity analysis, and a firm-level innovation analysis. For the cluster-level productivity analysis (as measured by output and value added per worker), it combines two established data sources in a novel way by importing average'industry-size-location'cluster-level business environment variables from the World Bank Enterprise Survey to the comprehensive Sri Lanka Census of Industry productivity data available for similar clusters of enterprises. For the firm-level total factor productivity analysis, it compares data from the 2011 World Bank Enterprise Survey with those from 2004. For the firm-level innovation analysis, it compares findings from the 2011 World Bank Enterprise Survey with a representative sample of enterprises collected as part of the Sri Lanka Longitudinal Survey of Enterprises. The empirical findings highlight the importance -- for cluster-level productivity, firm-level total factor productivity, and innovation -- of connectivity to global knowledge (reflected by one or more of export participation, directly imported inputs, foreign ownership, and use of the internet), availability of skills, access to finance, and competition. The paper also presents evidence, under the assumption that the samples are statistically representative, that both allocative and average technical efficiency have improved, with allocative efficiency increasing roughly four-fold between 2003 and 2010, and accounting for the overwhelming share of the aggregate increase in total factor productivity over this time period. Most of the improvement in allocative efficiency has occurred among larger firms, and in large rather than small cities.
    Keywords: Environmental Economics&Policies,E-Business,Labor Policies,Economic Theory&Research,Knowledge for Development
    Date: 2013–02–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:6354&r=knm
  7. By: Roman, Monica; Suciu, Christina
    Abstract: By this paper we intend to analyze the existing gap in the efficiency of R&D investment, at European level. The method employed in this respect is Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The evaluation of the performance in R&D in European countries, in terms of technical efficiency (TE) thus constitutes the main goal of this research. Small European economies (i.e. Luxemburg and Sweden) have high levels of research efficiency, while some of the larger ones, namely, United Kingdom, France, and Spain, show lower TE scores. Romania is characterized by a very low rate of knowledge production, suggesting that they are still in the phase of imitating and replicating existing technologies, while only little effort made to innovate.
    Keywords: R&D; Data Envelopment Analysis; technical efficiency
    JEL: C61 O31 R11
    Date: 2012–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:44000&r=knm
  8. By: Marco Ceccagnoli; Matthew J. Higgins; Vincenzo Palermo
    Abstract: Even though management consultants increasingly recommend that in-house research be outsourced, little is known about the conditions favoring substitution or complementarity between internal R&D and external technology acquisition. In this paper, we attempt to provide a deeper understanding of the firm-level drivers of complementarity between these two types of investments through the structural estimation of a flexible innovation production function, such as the translog. Our empirical analysis is based on a unique panel dataset on the R&D and in-licensing expenditures of 94 global pharmaceutical firms active in drug development between 1997 and 2005. Our results suggest that internal R&D and in-licensing in the pharmaceutical industry were neither complements nor substitutes during the study period. However, we find that the degree of complementarity is enhanced for firms with stronger absorptive capacity, economies of scope, and past licensing experience.
    JEL: L24 L65 O31 O32
    Date: 2013–02
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:18795&r=knm

This nep-knm issue is ©2013 by Laura Stefanescu. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.