nep-knm New Economics Papers
on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Economy
Issue of 2012‒01‒03
five papers chosen by
Laura Stefanescu
European Research Centre of Managerial Studies in Business Administration

  1. Innovation barriers for small biotech, ICT and clean tech firms:Coping with knowledge leakage and legitimacy deficits By Erik Stam; Neil Thompson; Andrea Herrmann; Marko Hekkert
  2. The determinants of eco innovation in green supply chains: evidence form an Italian sectoral study By Marco Frey; Fabio Iraldo; Francesco Testa
  3. Impact of SME policies on innovation capabilities: The Turkish case By Elif Bascavusoglu-Moreau; Mustafa Colakoglu
  4. Research, Science, and Technology Parks: Vehicles for Technology Transfer By Link, Albert N.; Scott, John T.
  5. Innovation versus Imitation: Intellectual Property Rights in a North-South Framework By Michael Wycherley

  1. By: Erik Stam; Neil Thompson; Andrea Herrmann; Marko Hekkert
    Abstract: Innovative high-tech small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) are thought to be drivers of economic renewal and growth. However, due to their limited size, SMEs face two fundamental innovation barriers: the risk that other organizations appropriate the returns to the newly created knowledge by SMEs (knowledge leakage), and a lack of understanding and recognition of their business on the part of potential stakeholders (legitimacy deficits). Based on a panel study of 196 SMEs this paper shows that biotech, ICT and clean tech firms choose different strategies to deal with knowledge leakage and legitimacy deficits. To prevent knowledge leakage, high-tech SMEs are very selective in choosing their R&D partners and collaborate with basic rather than applied technology developers. Furthermore, to gain organizational legitimacy, high-tech SMEs pursue activities that focus not only on product development but also on generating awareness and understanding of their technologies.  
    Date: 2011–12–23
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:eim:papers:h201115&r=knm
  2. By: Marco Frey (Istituto di Management - Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa); Fabio Iraldo (Istituto di Management - Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa); Francesco Testa (Istituto di Management - Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa)
    Abstract: In the last years attention has increased to the eco-innovation topic. Empirical studies have demonstrated that innovating firms grow faster, have higher productivity and are more profitable than their less innovative counterparts (Geroski et al., 1993; Roper and Hewitt-Dundas, 1998). Drawing upon a database of over 300 enterprises operating within eight defined green production chains working in the Province of Milan, this paper assesses the determinants and drawbacks of innovation. In particular, using an econometrical approach, we tested the following propositions: a) small dimension of enterprises is an obstacle to their innovation power; b) The adoption of an international strategy of production and commercialisation is an opportunity and a stimulus to eco-innovation; c) cooperation with research partners can help SMEs to overcome difficulties and help them to develop and offer eco-sustainable products and services. The econometric analysis shows a positive impact of dimension and level of internationalization on innovation capabilities. In addition, cooperation with research centers and access to capital market are positively related with effective innovations.
    Keywords: SME, eco-innovation, supply chain, green economy.
    JEL: M20 Q55
    Date: 2011–03–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:sse:wpaper:201103&r=knm
  3. By: Elif Bascavusoglu-Moreau (Centre for Business Research, Judge Business School, University of Cambridge); Mustafa Colakoglu (TTGV Turkey Technology Development Foundation)
    Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to explore the determinants of innovative capabilities in an emerging country context. We focus more particularly on the impact of recent changes in SME policies in Turkey. Using a unique firm-level survey conducted on 45.000 SMEs, innovative capabilities of firms are assessed at three different levels; their innovation efforts, innovation decision and innovative intensity. We analyze and compare the impact of two different incentive schemes; one a purely financial support, and the second, consultancy and technological assistance coupled with financial facilities. Whereas all firms seem to benefit from financial support, only less innovative firms take full advantage of the advisory services. Overall, the determinants of innovative capabilities depend considerably on the type of firms, suggesting the need for differentiated policy measures.
    Keywords: Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs), technological capability building, innovation, SME policies
    Date: 2011–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:met:stpswp:1105&r=knm
  4. By: Link, Albert N. (University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Department of Economics); Scott, John T. (University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Department of Economics)
    Abstract: Research, science, and technology parks are increasingly seen as a means to create dynamic clusters that accelerate economic growth and international competitiveness through the transfer of knowledge and technology. As such, it is important to understand the academic literature related to research, science, and technology parks (hereafter R-S-T parks, or simply parks) because that literature, albeit embryonic, has had and will continue to frame public policies related to park formations and growth. The purpose of this chapter is thus to overview the extant academic literature on knowledge and technology transfer to and from parks, and to discuss its importance to public policy issues.
    Keywords: Science park; Innovation; Public policy
    JEL: O30 O43
    Date: 2011–12–21
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ris:uncgec:2011_022&r=knm
  5. By: Michael Wycherley (Department of Economics, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland)
    Abstract: This paper examines differences in the optimal strength of intellectual property rights protection in a North-South endogenous growth model where it is possible for the South to engage in imitation, innovation or both. The possibility of Southern innovation implies sharp breaks in optimal policy at different stages of development in the South depending on whether it is optimal to induce innovation in the South. These sharp breaks imply strong policy conflict between the North and the South at intermediate levels of development but policy agreement elsewhere.
    Keywords: Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation, Economic Development
    JEL: O34 O31
    Date: 2011–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:tcd:tcduee:tep2011&r=knm

This nep-knm issue is ©2012 by Laura Stefanescu. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.