|
on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Economy |
Issue of 2011‒08‒22
three papers chosen by Laura Stefanescu European Research Centre of Managerial Studies in Business Administration |
By: | Maria Comune; Alireza Naghavi; Giovanni Prarolo |
Abstract: | With the rise of the knowledge economy; delivering sound innovation policies requires a thorough understanding of how knowledge is produced and diffused. This paper takes a step to analyze a new form of globalization; the so-called system of Global Innovation Networks (GINs); to shed light on how the protection of intellectual property rights (IPRs) influences their creation and development. We focus on the role of IPR protection in fostering international innovative activities in emerging economies (South); such as China and India; and more generally; how IPRs affect the development of GINs between newly industrialized countries and OECD countries. Using both survey-based firm-level and country-level global data; we find IPRs to be an important determinant of participation in GINS from a Southern perspective. We find IPR protection at home and its harmonization across county pairs foster South-North formation of GINs. We also find that a stringent regime in the destination country discourages foreign international innovative activities that originate in NICs. Both levels of our analysis confirm the ICT industry; particularly the hardware segment; to rely on IPRs when engaging in the international outsourcing and offshoring of innovation or in patenting activities abroad. |
Keywords: | Gravity Model; Information Communication Technology; Innovation; Intellectual Property Rights; International collaborations; Networks |
Date: | 2011–07 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:mod:recent:069&r=knm |
By: | CZARNITZKI Dirk; LOPES BENTO Cindy |
Abstract: | Applying a variant of a non-parametric matching estimator, we consider European funding and national funding as heterogeneous treatments, distinguishing and simultaneously analyzing the effect these treatments have on innovation input and performance. In terms of input, getting funding from both sources yields the highest impact. If funding from only one source is received, EU grants have higher effects. In terms of output, holding innovation expenditures constant, funding from both sources display higher sales of market novelties and future patent applications at the firm level. If only one grant is obtained, we find superiority for national funding. |
Keywords: | Subsidies; Innovation; Policy Evaluation; Treatment effects; Nonparametric matching estimation |
JEL: | C14 H50 O38 |
Date: | 2011–08 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:irs:cepswp:2011-42&r=knm |
By: | Bogliacino, Francesco (Universidad EAFIT); Piva, Mariacristina (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore); Vivarelli, Marco (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore) |
Abstract: | After discussing theory regarding the consequences of technological change on employment and surveying previous microeconometric literature, our aim with this paper is to test the possible job creation effect of business R&D expenditures, using a unique longitudinal database covering 677 European manufacturing and service firms over the period 1990-2008. The main outcome from the whole sample dynamic LSDVC (Least Squared Dummy Variable Corrected) estimate is the labour-friendly nature of companies’ R&D, the coefficient of which turns out to be statistically significant, although not very large in magnitude. However, the positive and significant impact of R&D expenditures on employment is detectable in services and high-tech manufacturing but absent in the more traditional manufacturing sectors. This means that we should not expect positive employment effects from increasing R&D in the majority of industrial sectors. This is something that should be borne in mind by European innovation policy makers having employment as one of their specific aims. |
Keywords: | innovation, employment, manufacturing, services, LSDVC |
JEL: | O33 |
Date: | 2011–08 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp5908&r=knm |