nep-knm New Economics Papers
on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Economy
Issue of 2007‒11‒17
five papers chosen by
Emanuele Canegrati
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

  1. Localized Technological Knowledge: Pecuniary Knowledge Externalities And Appropriability By Cristiano Antonelli
  2. Why New Business Development Projects Fail: Coping with the Differences of Technological versus Market Knowledge By Burgers, J.H.; Bosch, F.A.J. van den; Volberda, H.W.
  3. TECHNICAL STRATEGIC ALLIANCES AND PERFORMANCE: THE MEDIATING EFFECT OF KNOWLEDGE ¿BASED COMPETENCIES By Ana Villar; César Camisón; Montserrat Boronat
  4. Is Management Interdisciplinary? The Evolution of Management as an Interdisciplinary Field of Research and Education in the Netherlands By Baalen, P.J. van; Karsten, L.
  5. SEARCHING FOR SECTORAL PATTERNS OF INNOVATION IN EUROPEAN MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY By Celeste Amorim Varum; Carlos Pinho

  1. By: Cristiano Antonelli
    Abstract: Recent advances in the economics of knowledge highlight the key role of pecuniary knowledge externalities in explaining the system dynamics of total factor productivity growth. When non-exhaustible technological knowledge is an input both in the production of new goods and of further knowledge, and the acquisition of external knowledge, as a non-disposable input in the production of new knowledge, is not free, pecuniary externalities, as opposed to technological externalities, provide an important clue to understanding the key role of knowledge governance mechanisms in assessing the rate of growth of total factor productivity and economic systems at large. The negative effects upon appropriability limit the advantages of agglomeration.
    Keywords: TECHNOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE, PECUNIARY EXTERNALITIES, KNOWLEDGE GOVERNANCE, KNOWLEDGE APPROPRIABILITY Length 21 pages
    JEL: O33
    Date: 2007–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:esi:evopap:2007-09&r=knm
  2. By: Burgers, J.H.; Bosch, F.A.J. van den; Volberda, H.W. (Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), RSM Erasmus University)
    Abstract: Managing through projects has become important for generating new knowledge to cope with technological and market discontinuities. This paper examines how the fit between the creation of technological and market knowledge and important project management characteristics, i.e. project autonomy and completion criteria, influences the success of new business development (NBD) projects. In-depth longitudinal case research on NBD-projects commercialised during the period 1993-2003 in the consumer electronics industry highlights that project management characteristics focusing only on the creation of technological knowledge contributed to the failure of those NBD-projects that required new market knowledge as well. The findings indicate that senior management support and engaging in an alliance with partners possessing complementary market knowledge can offset this misalignment of the organisation of NBD-projects.
    Keywords: project management;new business development;exploitation-exploration;knowledge;new product development;strategic alliances;sales force;
    Date: 2007–10–30
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dgr:eureri:300011917&r=knm
  3. By: Ana Villar (Universitat Jaume I); César Camisón (Universitat Jaume I); Montserrat Boronat (Universitat Jaume I)
    Abstract: This study provides an empirical evidence of the relationship that exists between participation in technological strategic alliances and business performance by considering the knowledge-based distinctive competencies that the alliance is capable of generating as a mediating variable. The generation of knowledge in technological strategic alliances explains the contradictory results that emerge from the direct effect of strategic alliances on economic performance. The study uses a sample of Spanish industrial firms. The results findings prove that the relationship between R&D and innovation strategic alliances, and performance is mediated by the generation of knowledge-based distinctive competencies; and that the contribution of the participation in alliances to the growth of the firm¿s knowledge stock depends on its creation of innovation competencies. R&D managers should enhance the development of this kind of competencies in order to achieve superior performance. El presente trabajo provee evidencia empírica de la relación existente entre la participación en alianzas estratégicas tecnológicas y el desempeño organizativo, introduciendo como variable mediadora las competencias distintivas basadas en conocimiento que la alianza es capaz de generar. En la literatura existen resultados contradictorios en cuanto al efecto directo de las alianzas estratégicas en el desempeño organizativo. La generación de conocimiento en las alianzas estratégicas tecnológicas explica estos resultados contradictorios. A través de una muestra compuesta por empresas industriales españolas, nuestros resultados demuestran que la relación entre alianzas estratégicas en I+D y el desempeño, está mediada por la generación de competencias distintivas basadas en conocimiento; y que la contribución de la participación en las alianzas en el crecimiento del stock de conocimiento de la empresa depende de la creación de competencias en innovación. Los directivos de I+D deben alentar el desarrollo de este tipo de competencias para conseguir un desempeño organizativo superior.
    Keywords: Alianzas estratégicas, cooperación tecnológica, competencias basadas en conocimiento e innovación, desempeño organizativo. Strategic alliances, technological cooperation, knowledge-based and innovation competencies, performance
    JEL: C61 G31
    Date: 2007–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2007-11&r=knm
  4. By: Baalen, P.J. van; Karsten, L. (Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), RSM Erasmus University)
    Abstract: Management research and education are often characterized as being interdisciplinary. However, most discussions on what interdisciplinarity in management studies means have bogged down in ideological fixations. In this paper we alternatively take a historical perspective and analyze the evolution of the interdisciplinarity concept in management studies during the last decades in the Netherlands. We distinguish between two opposite versions of interdisciplinarity: a synoptic (conceptual) and an instrumental (pragmatic) one. Both versions resulted from different knowledge strategies (boundary-work) of competing and cooperating disciplines. We conclude that in the Netherlands instrumental versions of interdisciplinarity in management research and education prevailed.
    Keywords: Interdisciplinarity;disciplinarity;management science;management education;history of management education;
    Date: 2007–09–19
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dgr:eureri:300011799&r=knm
  5. By: Celeste Amorim Varum (Universidade de Aveiro); Carlos Pinho (Universidade de Aveiro)
    Abstract: The present paper is conducted under the research project “Enterprise of the Future: Trends and Scenarios towards Competitiveness” which attempts to disclosure determinants of future enterprise competitiveness. Innovation is not only a must today but also an imperative in future competitiveness scenarios. In modern evolutionary economics it is argued that sector-specific factors are one of the key factors explaining innovative behaviour and performance of firms. Several contributions have pointed that industries largely differ in terms of knowledge base and technological sources, opportunities and appropriation of innovative activities, technological trajectories and firms’ strategies. Using as background Pavitt’s taxonomy, this paper explores the nature, extent and sources of variety of innovation in the manufacturing industry, aiming at identifying common patterns across industries, and sectoral patterns across countries. This paper presents evidence based on the aggregated results of the last IV Community Innovation Survey released by EUROSTAT (CIS4), for which data is available for a number of industries and countries.
    Keywords: innovation, manufacturing industry, Community Innovation survey CIS
    JEL: L6 O3
    Date: 2007–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ave:wpaper:482007&r=knm

This nep-knm issue is ©2007 by Emanuele Canegrati. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.