nep-iue New Economics Papers
on Informal and Underground Economics
Issue of 2024‒10‒07
three papers chosen by
Catalina Granda Carvajal, Banco de la República


  1. Informal work and how to measure it: A formal consensus at the 100th International Conference of Labour Statisticians By Belchamber, Grant; Schetagne, Sylvain
  2. Informal Economy Rate and Largest Banknote Denomination By Vatansever, Berra
  3. Workers in informal employment organising and acting collectively: The role of trade unions By Xhafa, Edlira; Serrano, Melisa R.

  1. By: Belchamber, Grant; Schetagne, Sylvain
    Abstract: Over the past fifty years, interest in and analysis of informality at work has burgeoned. Informal employment, including but not limited to un-declared work, is a core concern for unions worldwide. In 2019, nearly 2 billion workers (about 6 in every 10) were in informal employment. Informal employment is found in all countries, but its prevalence is inversely proportional to income being highest in low income countries at around 90 per cent of total employment, and lowest in high-income countries at less than 20 per cent of total employment. The share of women in informal employment exceeds that of men in most countries.1 Statistics on informal employment are vital for describing the structure and extent of informal employment. They are essential to identify groups of persons in employment most represented and at risk of informality, and to provide information on exposure to economic and personal risks, decent work deficits and working conditions. For unionists and policy makers, there is a need to measure the prevalence of informality across jobs, economic units and activities; the distribution of informal and formal jobs by socio-demographic characteristics; the percentage of persons with informal main jobs in the informal and formal sectors; levels of protection for those in informal and formal employment; and contextual vulnerabilities, including poverty, inequalities, discrimination, access to land and natural resources, household composition, access to social protection. These data provide the evidentiary base to push for and implement policies that can improve the working lives of those in informal employment. (...)
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:gluwps:302301
  2. By: Vatansever, Berra
    Abstract: The rapidly growing literature on informality has demonstrated its effects on various aspects of countries' economies. This paper aims to build upon the existing literature on banknote denominations and informality by examining the relation between the value of the largest banknote denominations in countries (expressed in US dollars) and their GDP per capita, inflation rate, percentage of people using credit cards, and central bank independence index using cross-country data from 104 countries. This paper uses different methodologies such as plain correlation and least squares regression in order to find the correlation between the aforementioned variables. The results indicate a negative correlation between informal sector size and the value of the largest banknote denomination, suggesting that countries with larger informal sectors tend to have lower-value banknotes. In conclusion, this paper suggests that the informal sector is one of the underlying factors that explain why governments are averse to new larger banknote denominations and how this is related to the correlation between the informal sector percentage and the value of the largest banknote denomination in USD. Adding onto this, the paper also compares and contrasts the results of the observations obtained with the current literature on informality and banknote denominations.
    Keywords: informality; banknote denominations; credit card usage; GDP Per Capita; Inflation Rate
    JEL: E40 O17 O57
    Date: 2024–09–08
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:121957
  3. By: Xhafa, Edlira; Serrano, Melisa R.
    Abstract: The expansion of informal employment has been associated with increased exploitation and decent work deficits, leading to widespread poverty and growing inequalities. In response, a variety of forms of collective representation and action by and with informal workers have emerged demanding better and more stable incomes, job stability, better working conditions, access to social protection and protection from discrimination and harassment. In many cases, these workers are joining existing unions or forming new ones to press for their demands within the existing institutions of collective bargaining. In some other cases, the forms of worker representation bear many similarities to the early days of the labour movement as do their demands, which often go beyond immediate workplace needs and are framed in broader, more political terms. In particular, some groups of informal workers are pushing for a transformation of collective bargaining, both in terms of involving more actors and broadening the bargaining agenda. Contrary to the perception that unions have been lax in responding to the new challenges posed by the rise of informal employment, the literature suggests a process of union transformation that may be more advanced than it is generally acknowledged in academic debates. Rather than rendering unions obsolete, the diversity of forms of collective representation and action by workers in informal employment is reshaping unions, potentially strengthening them, or pushing them to rediscover their historical social movement identity. The research suggests that the future of worker representation is a bricolage of more inclusive forms of organisation, underpinned by more grassroots mobilisation and action, with the effect of revitalising the labour movement.
    Keywords: workers informal employment
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:gluwps:302299

This nep-iue issue is ©2024 by Catalina Granda Carvajal. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.