| Abstract: |
This research looked for comparing the fatwa of the Egyptian Dar al - Ifta and
the fatwa of the Indonesian Council of Ulema on network marketing, which has a
purpose to know the comparison. Conceptual and comparative approaches of the
standard judgment research with qualitative descriptive research. This
research took place first, they gave equal definition and how to derive only a
slight difference in the same questions. Adhere to the House of Fatwa, the
decisions of the Islamic synods and also looks at the people of competence.
And the Indonesian Council of Ulema on the result of the jurisprudence
university curriculum and explanatory and restorative and fill the pretext.
Secondly, in their inquiring questions, they have a special way to report on
network marketing. The fatwa report of the Egyptian Fatwa House passed the
fatwa through four basic stages in the mufti's mind: photography,
conditioning, statement of judgment, and the stage of downloading and issuing
the fatwa; Also, attention to: The decision of the Minister of Industry and
Trade and the system of the Minister of Commerce. |