nep-ipr New Economics Papers
on Intellectual Property Rights
Issue of 2026–06–22
two papers chosen by
Giovanni Battista Ramello, Università di Turino


  1. On the Role of Innovation in the Generation of Value-Added Trade Opportunities By Kyriakos Drivas; Afroditi Anagnosti
  2. Digital Content Exports and Copyright Protection through FTA By Hyunsoo KIM

  1. By: Kyriakos Drivas; Afroditi Anagnosti
    Abstract: Innovation and exports are closely related concepts that are frequently explored in the academic literature, particularly in the fields of economics, business strategy, and intellectual property management. The purpose of this paper is to explore these concepts via two complementary approaches. First, while the relationship between innovation and exports is well established, the specific contributions of different stages of innovation remain underexplored. We therefore use the principle of relatedness and examine how different stages of innovation—namely technology, market, and design activities—are related to export specialisation. The results show that technology- and market-related capabilities serve as key drivers of new export specialisation. Second, we conducted an in-depth survey of Greek inventors with the aim to identify the motives, challenges and opportunities they face throughout the complex process of patenting and valorisation. The study reveals significant differences in the patenting motivations of Greek inventors according to their affiliation. Independent inventors and university-affiliated researchers see patents primarily as tools for commercialisation, exploiting them through licensing or sales. In contrast, large companies focus on strategic patenting to protect products and block competitors.
    Keywords: Innovation, export, patents, inventors, motives to file IPRs
    Date: 2025–04
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hel:greese:207
  2. By: Hyunsoo KIM (KOREA INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC POLICY (KIEP))
    Abstract: Korea has continuously made efforts to secure overseas markets and enhance industrial competitiveness. The government is actively pursuing trade agreements with around 10 more countries, including those in Africa where FTAs have yet to be established, thereby continuing its FTA policy. The growing market for digital content and trade volume are accompanied by the international spread of IPR protection for digital content, and that one of the main channels driving this spread is FTAs. Strong IPR provisions for digital content in FTAs are no longer limited to agreements among high-income countries. FTAs with middle- and lower-income countries are also increasingly including more robust IPR protection measures. Moreover, the strengthening of IPR protection through FTAs has a positive effect on digital content trade. Given the rapid expansion of Korea’s digital content market and trade, such trade policy tools—including FTAs—can play a valuable role in sustaining this upward trend. Countries with which Korea is currently pursuing Economic Partnership Agreements(EPAs) can be broadly categorized into three groups based on the level of intellectual property rights (IPR) protection in their existing FTAs and their current domestic IPR legal frameworks. The first group includes countries such as the Dominican Republic and Morocco, which have already concluded FTAs containing relatively high-level IPR protection provisions and whose domestic legal systems also provide comparatively strong protection for IPR. The second group includes countries like Thailand, which have signed FTAs that broadly cover various aspects of IPR protection, but whose domestic legal frameworks remain insufficient for effectively protecting digital content copyright. The third group consists of countries such as Pakistan, Egypt, and Kenya, which have not previously concluded FTAs that contain substantial IPR protection provisions and whose domestic legal systems are currently inadequate for the practical enforcement of digital content copyright. This classification allows Korea to calibrate the direction of its FTA policies with each partner and assess the appropriate level of IPR protection that should be pursued in the EPA negotiations. Promoting digital content copyright protection—regardless of the partner country’s classification—has a positive effect on the trade of digital content-related services. Therefore, it would be desirable to include high-standard IPR protection provisions in EPAs. However, as noted above, it would be more realistic to adopt differentiated approaches that take into account each EPA partner’s policy direction in existing FTAs and their current level of IPR protection.
    Keywords: Digital Content; Copyright; IPR; FTA
    Date: 2025–06–28
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ris:kiepwe:022491

This nep-ipr issue is ©2026 by Giovanni Battista Ramello. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the Griffith Business School of Griffith University in Australia.