nep-ipr New Economics Papers
on Intellectual Property Rights
Issue of 2018‒04‒30
three papers chosen by
Giovanni Ramello
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro”

  1. Trade Liberalization, Absorptive Capacity and the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights By GHOSH, Arghya; ISHIKAWA, Jota
  2. Knowledge sources and impacts on subsequent inventions: Do green technologies differ from non-green ones? By Nicolò Barbieri; Alberto Marzucchi; Ugo Rizzo
  3. Academic Inventors and the Antecedents of Green Technologies. A Regional Analysis of Italian Patent Data. By Quatraro, Francesco; Scandura, Alessandra

  1. By: GHOSH, Arghya; ISHIKAWA, Jota
    Abstract: We examine how trade liberalization affects South’s incentive to protect intellectual property rights (IPR) in a North-South duopoly model where a low-cost North firm competes with a high-cost South firm in the South market. The North firm serves the South market through either exports or foreign direct investment (FDI). The extent of effective cost difference between North and South depends on South’s imitation, which in turn depends on South’s IPR protection and absorptive capacity and North firm’s location choice, all of which are endogenously determined in our model. For a given level of IPR protection, South’s absorptive capacity under exports may be greater than under FDI. Even though innovation is exogenous to the model (and hence unaffected by South’s IPR policy), strengthening IPR protection in South can improve its welfare. The relationship between trade costs and the degree of IPR protection that maximizes South welfare is non-monotone. In particular, South has an incentive to protect IPR only when trade costs are moderate. When masking technology or licensing is incorporated into the model, however, some protection of IPR may be optimal for South even if the trade costs are not moderate.
    Keywords: intellectual property rights (IPR), absorptive capacity, imitation, foreign direct investment (FDI), licensing, masking, oligopoly, North-South trade model
    JEL: F12 F13 D43
    Date: 2018–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hit:hiasdp:hias-e-67&r=ipr
  2. By: Nicolò Barbieri (Department of Economics and Management, University of Ferrara (IT)); Alberto Marzucchi (SPRU, Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex (UK)); Ugo Rizzo (Department of Economics and Management, University of Ferrara (IT))
    Abstract: The paper contributes to our understanding of the nature and impact of green technological change. We focus on the search and impact spaces of green inventions, scrutinising the knowledge recombination processes leading to the generation of the invention and the impact of the invention on subsequent technological developments. Using a large sample of patents filed during 1980-2012, we analyse a set of established patent indicators that capture different aspects of the invention process. Technological heterogeneity is controlled for by comparing green and non-green technologies within similar narrow technological domains. Green technologies are found to be more complex and radical than non-green ones and to have a larger and more pervasive impact on subsequent inventions. However, the results show a variety of distinctive patterns with respect to the knowledge dimension considered. We derive some important policy implications.
    Keywords: environmental inventions, patent data, knowledge recombination, knowledge impact
    JEL: O33 O34 Q55
    Date: 2018–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:sru:ssewps:2018-11&r=ipr
  3. By: Quatraro, Francesco; Scandura, Alessandra (University of Turin)
    Abstract: This work investigates the generation of green technologies (GTs) in Italian NUTS 3 regions across time, by focusing on the knowledge generation mechanisms underlying the creation of green patents. Firstly, we hypothesize that inventions in non-green technological domains positively influence the generation of GTs, because the latter occur as the outcome of a recombination process among a wide array of technological domains. Secondly, we hypothesise that the involvement of academic inventors in patenting activity bears positive effects on the generation of GTs, because they are able to manage the recombination across different technological domains. Thirdly, we explore the interaction effect between academic inventors’ involvement and non-green technologies to investigate whether the former are especially relevant in presence of higher or lower levels of the latter. We estimate zero-inflated negative binomial, spatial durbin and logistic regressions on a dataset of 103 Italian NUTS 3 regions for which we collected patent and regional data for the time span 1998-2009. The results suggest that both academic inventors and spillovers from polluting technologies bear positive direct effects on the generation of GTs; moreover, we find that academic inventors compensate for low levels of spillovers.
    Date: 2018–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uto:dipeco:201806&r=ipr

This nep-ipr issue is ©2018 by Giovanni Ramello. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.