nep-ipr New Economics Papers
on Intellectual Property Rights
Issue of 2016‒06‒04
four papers chosen by
Giovanni Ramello
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro”

  1. Assessing Innovator and Grower Profit Potential under Different New Plant Variety Commercialization Strategies By Gallardo, R. Karina; McCluskey, Jill J.; Rickard, Bradley J.; Akhundjanov, Sherzod B.
  2. Patent rights, product market reforms, and innovation By Philippe Aghion; Peter Howitt; Susanne Prantl
  3. Innovation and Firm Productivity: Evidence from the US Patent Data By Cui, Jingbo; Li, Xiaogang
  4. Heterogeneous Effects of Private Label and Branded Products on Farm-Retail Price Transmission: The Case of the U.S. Fluid Milk Market By Liu, Yizao; Rabinowitz, Adam; Chen, Xuan

  1. By: Gallardo, R. Karina; McCluskey, Jill J.; Rickard, Bradley J.; Akhundjanov, Sherzod B.
    Abstract: This research is motivated by the sharp increase in the number of patented fruit varieties developed by breeding programs at public universities in the United States. Such varieties are licensed to growers as a way to generate revenue for universities through the use of fees and royalties. Although the use of fees and royalties for patents has been well discussed in the economic literature, there is very little empirical work that examines these questions for varietal innovations in agriculture. Horticultural variety innovations are particularly interesting as they typically involve a demand-enhancing innovation rather than a cost-inducing innovation, and because, in most cases, the new varieties are only intended to replace a small share of production dedicated to existing varieties. We found evidence that fixed-fees under an exclusive contract was the most profitable for growers. For the innovator, the most profitable scheme was the exclusive per-box royalty contract. Our findings on potential profits for both adopters and innovators signal that exclusive contracting would outperform the non-exclusive licensing schemes. Given that the innovations are occurring at land-grant universities and that the technology is largely being distributed to U.S. growers, further work might consider the net societal impacts of the various licensing strategies; this would extend our analysis to consider the economic effects from licensing for the innovator as well as the effects for producers.
    Keywords: intellectual property, apple varieties, university innovators, Demand and Price Analysis, Marketing, Q13,
    Date: 2016
  2. By: Philippe Aghion; Peter Howitt; Susanne Prantl
    Keywords: intellectual property rights; competition; innovation
    JEL: L1 L5 O3 O4
    Date: 2015–09
  3. By: Cui, Jingbo; Li, Xiaogang
    Keywords: Productivity, Backward Citations, Innovation, Knowledge Stock, Industrial Organization, Productivity Analysis, Research and Development/Tech Change/Emerging Technologies, d22, O31,
  4. By: Liu, Yizao; Rabinowitz, Adam; Chen, Xuan
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Demand and Price Analysis,
    Date: 2016

This nep-ipr issue is ©2016 by Giovanni Ramello. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.