nep-ipr New Economics Papers
on Intellectual Property Rights
Issue of 2013‒01‒19
five papers chosen by
Giovanni Ramello
Universita' Amedeo Avogadro

  1. Institutions and Agents of Technological Diffusion in 19th Century Spain By Pretel, David; Saiz, Patricio
  2. Intellectual Property Rights, Appropriation Instruments and Innovation Activities: Evidence from Tunisian Firms By Olfa KAMMOUN; Mohieddine RAHMOUNI
  3. Does Going Public Affect Innovation? By Bernstein, Shai
  4. Spillovers from R&D and other intangible investment: evidence from UK industries By Haskel, J; Goodridge, P; Wallis, G
  5. Intangible capital and growth in advanced economies: measurement methods and comparative results By Haskel, J; Corrado, C; Jona-Lasinio, C; Iommi, M

  1. By: Pretel, David (Trinity Hall. University of Cambridge); Saiz, Patricio (Departamento de Análisis Económico (Teoría e Historia Económica). Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)
    Abstract: Although some recent studies have provided fresh intellectual insights on the role of patent practitioners during the nineteenth century, they have largely overlooked the activity of these actors in international patenting and peripheral countries. This study will fill a gap in the existing scholarship through an examination of the role and influence of patent agents in Spain from the introduction of the country’s first modern intellectual property law in 1826 to the regulation of agents’ practice in 1902. The study explores the range of activities carried out by those individuals employed by Spanish and foreign patentees to deal with both the patent application process and the commercialisation of property rights. Our argument here is that a focus on patent agents and other forms of agency can provide us with a better understanding of processes of invention, innovation and technology transfer in the European periphery during the nineteenth century. The history of technology in the periphery requires attention not only to the incentives for innovation but also to the social procedure of transmission of knowledge, ideas and information as well as the actors involved in this activity. Our focus cannot be solely on the transfer and communication of knowledge and information from advanced industrial nations to ‘backward’ ones; it must also include the processes of interaction, exchange and appropriation that occurred in both directions.
    Keywords: agency, agents, patents, technology transfer.
    JEL: N73 O33 O34
    Date: 2011–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uam:wpapeh:201105&r=ipr
  2. By: Olfa KAMMOUN; Mohieddine RAHMOUNI
    Abstract: This paper documents the relationship between appropriation instruments and the innovation activity and other determinants of the innovation behavior of firms in Tunisia. It focuses on studying the factors that determine the appropriation of innovation results like the value of sales of the firms, networking, science-industry linkage, competitive pressure and demand pull. To this end, we propose an econometric analysis of various hypotheses tested in a sample of 586 Tunisian firms. We find significant interaction effects between appropriability and R&D activity. The results confirm that patenting is primarily driven by firm-level factors, not by industry affiliation. Access to external knowledge and firm\'s specific characteristics are the most factors linked to the innovation protection. Firms that use appropriation instruments have a higher probability of investing in R&D than the other ones. Indeed, the capability to integrate external knowledge and performing R&D (networking, science-industry linkage, cooperation with other firms, belonging to a group) is related to the use of appropriation instruments.
    Keywords: Appropriation instruments, patents; Innovation; development; absorptive capacity
    JEL: O12 O30
    Date: 2013
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:grt:wpegrt:2013-01&r=ipr
  3. By: Bernstein, Shai (Stanford University)
    Abstract: This paper investigates the effects of going public on innovation by comparing the innovative activity of firms that went public with firms that withdrew their IPO filing and remained private. NASDAQ fluctuations during the book-building phase are used as an instrument for IPO completion. Using patent-based metrics, I find that the quality of internal innovation declines following the IPO and firms experience both an exodus of skilled inventors and a decline in productivity of remaining inventors. However, public firms attract new human capital and acquire external innovations. The analysis reveals that going public changes firms' strategies in pursuing innovation.
    Date: 2012–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ecl:stabus:2126&r=ipr
  4. By: Haskel, J; Goodridge, P; Wallis, G
    Date: 2012–08–21
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:imp:wpaper:10009&r=ipr
  5. By: Haskel, J; Corrado, C; Jona-Lasinio, C; Iommi, M
    Date: 2012–08–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:imp:wpaper:9913&r=ipr

This nep-ipr issue is ©2013 by Giovanni Ramello. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.