nep-ipr New Economics Papers
on Intellectual Property Rights
Issue of 2010‒05‒15
two papers chosen by
Roland Kirstein
Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg

  1. The determinants of technology transfer efficiency and the role of innovation policies: a survey By Maria D.M. Oliveira; Aurora A.C. Teixeira
  2. The Lead Factory Concept: Benefiting from an Efficient Knowledge Transfer By Patricia Deflorin; Helmut Dietl; Markus Lang; Maike Scherrer-Rathje

  1. By: Maria D.M. Oliveira (UPIN, Universidade do Porto); Aurora A.C. Teixeira (CEF.UP, Faculdade de Economia, Universidade do Porto; INESC Porto; OBEGEF)
    Abstract: The diversity found in the various Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs), besides being a consequence of the capacities and motives of the different stakeholders involved (public research organisations, industry, consulting firms and public authorities) also reflects the specificities of public incentives or policies and their differing degrees of commitment to technology transfer. Notwithstanding the fact that the literature on technology transfer is voluminous, few studies (up to the present date) have investigated the role of innovation policy on TTOs efficiency and the instruments available for governments to improve technology transfer from publicly funded research. The present paper surveys the literature on the determinants of TTOs efficiency, highlighting in particular the role of innovation policy. Additionally, evidence within the context of the European Union on innovation policies for technology transfer improvement is detailed.
    Keywords: Technology transfer, innovation policies, technology transfer efficiency
    JEL: O31 O34 O38
    Date: 2010–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:por:fepwps:375&r=ipr
  2. By: Patricia Deflorin (Institute for Strategy and Business Economics, University of Zurich); Helmut Dietl (Institute for Strategy and Business Economics, University of Zurich); Markus Lang (Institute for Strategy and Business Economics, University of Zurich); Maike Scherrer-Rathje (Institute for Technology Management, University of St. Gallen)
    Abstract: This paper analyses the effectiveness of knowledge transfer between research and development (R&D) and intra-firm production units. Specifically, two distinct network structures are compared: the lead factory concept and traditional networks of R&D and production. Based on an analytical two-stage decision model for prototype and serial production, we highlight relevant factors that determine the relative advantages and disadvantages of the lead factory concept in comparison to a traditional network structure. In particular, the lead factory concept is more cost-efficient than the traditional network if there are a high number of production plants, the adaptation costs for implementing the transferred prototype from the lead factory to the plant are low, the manufacturing costs for the prototype are high, and the manufacturing processes are not highly specific or knowledge intensive.
    Keywords: Operations Management, Manufacturing, Lead Factory, Knowledge Transfer, Cost Benefit Analysis
    Date: 2010–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iso:wpaper:0127&r=ipr

This nep-ipr issue is ©2010 by Roland Kirstein. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.