nep-ino New Economics Papers
on Innovation
Issue of 2024‒01‒08
twelve papers chosen by
Uwe Cantner, University of Jena


  1. Innovation Contests with Distinct Approaches By Block, Simon
  2. Turning technological relatedness into industrial strategy: The productivity effects of Smart Specialisation in Europe By Giacomo Lo Conte; Andrea Mina; Silvia Rocchetta
  3. Tickets to the Global Market: First US Patent Awards and Chinese Firm Exports By Robin Kaiji Gong; Yao Amber Li; Kalina Manova; Stephen Teng Sun; Kalina B. Manova
  4. The State of the Entrepreneurial State: Empirical Evidence of Mission-Led Innovation Projects around the Globe By Batbaatar, Maral; Sandström, Christian; P Larsson, Johan; Wennberg, Karl
  5. Innovation-promoting impacts of public procurement By Elvira Uyarra; Oishee Kundu; Raquel Ortega-Argiles; Malcolm Harbour
  6. The Effect of Public Science on Corporate R&D By Ashish Arora; Sharon Belenzon; Larisa C. Cioaca; Lia Sheer; Hansen Zhang
  7. The spatial and scalar implications of missions: Challenges and opportunities for policy By Elvira Uyarra; Iris Wanzenböck; Kieron Flanagan
  8. Are Immigrants More Innovative? Evidence from Entrepreneurs By Kyung Min Lee; Mee Jung Kim; J. David Brown; John S. Earle; Zhen Liu
  9. Demand, public procurement and transformation By Jakob Edler
  10. European Universities and Knowledge Alliances in their territorial innovation ecosystems By ESPARZA MASANA Ricard; WOOLFORD Jayne
  11. The EU’s Competitive Advantage in the 'Clean-Energy Arms Race' By Dahlström, Petter; Lööf, Hans; Sjöholm, Fredrik; Stephan, Andreas
  12. The Entrepreneurial League Table of German Regions 1895 and 2019 By Michael Fritsch; Maria Greve; Michael Wyrwich

  1. By: Block, Simon
    JEL: D81 O31 O38
    Date: 2023
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:vfsc23:277686&r=ino
  2. By: Giacomo Lo Conte; Andrea Mina; Silvia Rocchetta
    Abstract: In this paper we explore the impact of place-based innovation policy in Europe. We focus on the effects of Smart Specialisation strategies on the labour productivity of regional economies. We design an analytical framework that takes into account the entrepreneurial discovery process through which the policy is implemented, and connect the technological relatedness of regions with their specialisation choices. We use an IV estimation approach capable of handling endogeneity problems, and apply it to an extensive dataset of 102 NUTS2 regions extracted from the European Commission Smart Specialisation Portal. The results show that Smart Specialisation strategies increase labour productivity as long as the priorities are set in sectors related to pre-existing technological capabilities, indicating the fundamental importance of path-dependency in diversification choices. The findings deepen our understanding of regional development and innovation strategies, and have relevant implications for the implementation of appropriate policy instruments.
    Keywords: Related diversification; Specialization; Regional policy; Innovation policy; Place-based Policies
    JEL: O33 R11
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:egu:wpaper:2323&r=ino
  3. By: Robin Kaiji Gong; Yao Amber Li; Kalina Manova; Stephen Teng Sun; Kalina B. Manova
    Abstract: We investigate how international patent activity enables firms from emerging economies to thrive in the global marketplace. We match Chinese customs data to US patent records, and leverage the quasi-random assignment of USPTO patent examiners to identify the causal effect of a US patent grant on the subsequent export performance of Chinese firms. Successful first-time patent applicants achieve significantly higher export growth, compared to otherwise similar first-time applicants that failed. This effect operates only in small part through market protection for technologically patent-related products in the US, and is largely driven by expansion in other markets. The response across destinations and products reveals that a US patent award signals the Chinese firm’s capacity to produce high-quality products and credibility to honor contracts, mitigating information frictions in international trade. There is little evidence for the relaxation of financial constraints or the promotion of follow-on innovation.
    Keywords: patent rights, innovation, export performance, trade, market protection, asymmetric information, signaling
    JEL: F10 F14 O30 O31 O34
    Date: 2023
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ces:ceswps:_10790&r=ino
  4. By: Batbaatar, Maral (The Ratio Institute); Sandström, Christian (The Ratio Institute); P Larsson, Johan (The Ratio Institute); Wennberg, Karl (The Ratio Institute)
    Abstract: This paper reviews theoretical rationales for mission-oriented innovation policy and provides an empirical overview of extant 28 papers and 49 cases on the topic. We synthetize varieties of mission formulations, actors involved, and characteristics of missions described as more or less failed or successful. 59 percent of the studied missions are still ongoing, 33 percent are considered successful and 8 percent as failures. 67 percent of the studied missions have taken place in Europe, 24 percent in North America and 8 percent in Asia. The majority of innovation projects referred to as missions do not fulfill the criteria defined by the OECD. Results suggest that missions related to technological or agricultural innovations are more often successful than broader types of missions aimed at social or ecological challenges. Challenges regarding the governance and evaluation of missions remain unresolved in the literature. We find no case that contains a cost-benefit analysis or takes opportunity cost into account.
    Keywords: Innovation; Government agencies; Mission-oriented Policies; Grand societal challenges
    JEL: H11 H50 L26 L52 O32
    Date: 2023–12–15
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hhs:ratioi:0368&r=ino
  5. By: Elvira Uyarra (Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, The University of Manchester); Oishee Kundu (Y Lab, Cardiff University); Raquel Ortega-Argiles (Productivity Institute, The University of Manchester); Malcolm Harbour (Connected Places Catapult)
    Abstract: The use of public procurement to advance innovation but also other social, environmental and public service delivery goals has been high in the innovation policy debate in the last two decades. Drawing from the literature on the economics of innovation and innovation policy, this paper provides an overview and critique of the key debates surrounding public procurement of innovation, specifically the rationales, means and challenges associated with its use as an innovation policy tool. We note that despite strong academic interest and policy activity in this area, strategic public procurement to promote innovation is still unevenly adopted. The evidence base is also weak in terms of the methods and data to understand its impact. We argue more research is needed to quantify the outcomes of procurement interventions in different national and sectoral contexts and their integration with other innovation policy instruments.
    Keywords: Public procurement, Innovation, Regulation, Public policy, Evaluation
    Date: 2023–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:bdj:smioir:2023-06&r=ino
  6. By: Ashish Arora; Sharon Belenzon; Larisa C. Cioaca; Lia Sheer; Hansen Zhang
    Abstract: We study the relationships between corporate R&D and three components of public science: knowledge, human capital, and invention. We identify the relationships through firm-specific exposure to changes in federal agency R\&D budgets that are driven by the political composition of congressional appropriations subcommittees. Our results indicate that R&D by established firms, which account for more than three-quarters of business R&D, is affected by scientific knowledge produced by universities only when the latter is embodied in inventions or PhD scientists. Human capital trained by universities fosters innovation in firms. However, inventions from universities and public research institutes substitute for corporate inventions and reduce the demand for internal research by corporations, perhaps reflecting downstream competition from startups that commercialize university inventions. Moreover, abstract knowledge advances per se elicit little or no response. Our findings question the belief that public science represents a non-rival public good that feeds into corporate R&D through knowledge spillovers.
    JEL: O3
    Date: 2023–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:31899&r=ino
  7. By: Elvira Uyarra (Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, The University of Manchester); Iris Wanzenböck (Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University); Kieron Flanagan (Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, The University of Manchester)
    Abstract: In recent years, debates about innovation policy have highlighted a broader scope for action and a widening of the range of policy goals such policies are expected to (or might be expected to) address. Scholars and analysts have both detected but also advocated a shift from generic and primarily R&D-based innovation support measures towards a new (or third) 'generation' of innovation policy - variously referred to as challenge-led, mission-orientated or transformative innovation policies. This new generation of innovation policy thinking is a response to major societal challenges such as climate change, migration, or food and energy security - the implication being that traditional innovation policies were either inadequate in response to or else uninterested in such challenges. A more targeted and challenge-oriented innovation policy should, it is argued, help to deliver desired, and not just more, innovations. This implies a more active role of the state in funding risk-taking activities and in creating - not just correcting - markets. This 'normative turn' in innovation policy has also been observed in the design and implementation of regional policies, with a greater emphasis on the socio-ecological dimension of innovation, particularly in the context of the European Green Deal and the Innovation Strategies for Sustainability (S4). Whilst there is much agreement that bolder, more customised and directional policies are needed to tackle the societal challenges of our time, there is less consensus about how such policies should be implemented in practice.
    Keywords: Transformative innovation policies, Mission-oriented approaches, Societal challenges, Spatial and scalar dimensions, Regional innovation
    Date: 2023–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:bdj:smioir:2023-04&r=ino
  8. By: Kyung Min Lee; Mee Jung Kim; J. David Brown; John S. Earle; Zhen Liu
    Abstract: We evaluate the contributions of immigrant entrepreneurs to innovation in the U.S. using linked survey-administrative data on 199, 000 firms with a rich set of innovation measures and other firm and owner characteristics. We find that not only are immigrants more likely than natives to own businesses, but on average their firms display more innovation activities and outcomes. Immigrant owned firms are particularly more likely to create completely new products, improve previous products, use new processes, and engage in both basic and applied R&D, and their efforts are reflected in substantially higher levels of patents and productivity. Immigrant owners are slightly less likely than natives to imitate products of others and to hire more employees. Delving into potential explanations of the immigrant-native differences, we study other characteristics of entrepreneurs, access to finance, choice of industry, immigrant self-selection, and effects of diversity. We find that the immigrant innovation advantage is robust to controlling for detailed characteristics of firms and owners, it holds in both high-tech and non-high-tech industries and, with the exception of productivity, it tends to be even stronger in firms owned by diverse immigrant-native teams and by diverse immigrants from different countries. The evidence from nearly all measures that immigrants tend to operate more innovative and productive firms, together with the higher share of business ownership by immigrants, implies large contributions to U.S. innovation and growth.
    Date: 2023–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cen:wpaper:23-56&r=ino
  9. By: Jakob Edler (Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, The University of Manchester; Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research)
    Abstract: In this article we want to explore the role of the state to influence and support the demand for innovation in the context of transformation with a triple focus. First, we discuss the importance of demand for innovation and transformation. Second, we elaborate the conceptual underpinning of state intervention on the demand side. This In doing so, we link the demand side interventions with both the transformation debate and the innovation based competitiveness of systems debate. We then zoom into the main focus of this discussion paper, public demand and public procurement practice for innovation and transformation as this is - or can be - a powerful lever to spur both transformation and innovation which is largely underexplored and underused. Here we differentiate different forms of public procurement as well as different functions it can play in different transformation contexts. Rather than elaborating individual instruments and measures to support procurement, which is done in many ways elsewhere, we conclude with a number of high level recommendation for policy and analysis in order to further a debate the value of which has been recognised, but yet which has not materialised in any serious policy strategies for procurement.
    Keywords: Demand-side policies, State intervention, Public procurement, Sectoral policies, Transformation and innovation
    Date: 2023–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:bdj:smioir:2023-03&r=ino
  10. By: ESPARZA MASANA Ricard; WOOLFORD Jayne (European Commission - JRC)
    Abstract: Higher education institutions (HEIs) are increasingly expected to contribute to regional development and transformative innovation and heralded as actors of change in the context of the twin transitions and European recovery and resilience. Knowledge Alliances and European University alliances are two funding initiatives for HEIs that enable the translation of this broad strategic agenda into an individual and local context and the negotiation of the global (excellence) – local (relevance) dichotomy and potential alignment of their missions. The potential for HEIs to contribute to and participate in regional innovation ecosystems and European and global education, research and innovation agendas is under-exploited. This report explores the role of these two initiatives in strengthening this interaction.
    Date: 2023–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc135388&r=ino
  11. By: Dahlström, Petter (Indek, Royal Institute of Technology); Lööf, Hans (Indek, Royal Institute of Technology); Sjöholm, Fredrik (Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN)); Stephan, Andreas (Linnaeus University)
    Abstract: The net-zero agreement on carbon emission from Paris 2015 gives a key role to fossil-free energy technologies with an expected multifold growth rate over the coming decades, when successively replacing oil, coal, and gas. In this paper, we delve into the EU’s competitive advantage in the evolving trade war in clean energy, investigate European strengths and weaknesses in innovation and production, and discuss the impact of the upcoming trade war on the global warming challenge. Our results show that the EU has a strong position in innovation capabilities in the strategic net-zero technologies. However, this is not matched by production capabilities: EU has only a few firms among the leading manufacturers in net-zero technologies.
    Keywords: Energy geopolitics; Net-zero technologies; Patents; Innovation Energy geopolitics; Net-zero technologies; Patents; Innovation
    JEL: F02 O18 Q50 R10
    Date: 2023–12–15
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hhs:iuiwop:1483&r=ino
  12. By: Michael Fritsch (Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany); Maria Greve (Utrecht University, The Netherlands, and Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany); Michael Wyrwich (University of Groningen, The Netherlands, and Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany)
    Abstract: We describe and analyze the long-term development of self-employment in German regions between 1895 and 2019. Based on rankings ("league tables") for the two years we identify those regions where the relative level of self-employment significantly increased ('leapfroggers'), and those where the level of self-employment as compared to other regions deteriorated ('plungers'). Germany is a particularly interesting case due to the turbulent history of the country over the 20th century that includes two lost World Wars, occupation by foreign armies, forty years of division into a capitalist and a socialist state, as well as reunification and shock transformation of the eastern part to a market economy. While there is some persistence of regional self-employment despite all the disruptive changes, we also find and discuss considerable changes of regional levels of entrepreneurial activity.
    Keywords: Entrepreneurship, self-employment, regional dynamics
    JEL: L26 R11 O52
    Date: 2024–01–02
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:jrp:jrpwrp:2024-001&r=ino

This nep-ino issue is ©2024 by Uwe Cantner. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.