nep-ino New Economics Papers
on Innovation
Issue of 2023‒05‒29
three papers chosen by
Uwe Cantner
University of Jena

  1. Does green transition promote green innovation and technological acquisitions? By Udichibarna Bose; Wildmer Daniel Gregori; Maria Martinez Cillero
  2. Clean innovation and heterogeneous financing costs By Emanuele Campiglio; Alessandro Spiganti; Anthony Wiskich
  3. Intangible Capital as a Production Factor. Firm-level Evidence from Austrian Microdata By Klaus Friesenbichler; Agnes Kügler; Julia Schieber-Knöbl

  1. By: Udichibarna Bose; Wildmer Daniel Gregori; Maria Martinez Cillero
    Abstract: This analysis explores the implications of technological shifts towards greener and sustainable innovations on acquisition propensity between firms with different technological capacities. Using a dataset of completed control acquisition deals over the period of 2009-2020 from 23 OECD countries, we find that innovative firms are more likely to acquire innovative target companies. We also find that green acquirors (i.e. firms with green patents) are more inclined to enter into acquisition deals with green firms, possibly due to their technological proximity and informational advantages which further enhances their post-acquisition green innovation performances. Our results also show an increase in green acquisitions after the Paris Agreement by non-green acquiror firms, and these are more pronounced for acquirors in climate policyrelevant sectors and countries with low environmental standards than their counterparts. However, green acquisitions after the Paris Agreement do not show any significant impact on their post-acquisition innovation performances, raising concerns related to greenwashing behaviour by investing firms.
    JEL: G34 O30 Q54
    Date: 2023
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ptu:wpaper:w202305&r=ino
  2. By: Emanuele Campiglio (Department of Economics, University of Bologna; RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment (EIEE), Milan; LSE Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London); Alessandro Spiganti (RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment (EIEE), Milan; Department of Economics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice); Anthony Wiskich (Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Australian National University, Canberra)
    Abstract: Access to finance is a major barrier to clean innovation. We incorporate heterogeneous and endogenous financing costs in a directed technical change model and identify optimal climate mitigation policies. The presence of a financing experience effect pushes the policymaker to strengthen policies in the short-term, both to shift innovation and production towards clean sectors and to reduce the financing cost differential across technologies, which further facilitates the transition. The optimal climate policy mix between carbon taxes and clean research subsidies depends on the drivers of the experience effect. In our benchmark scenario, where clean financing costs decline as cumulative clean output increases, we find an optimal carbon price premium of 47% in 2025, relative to a case with no financing costs.
    Keywords: carbon tax, directed technological change, endogenous growth, financing experience effect, innovation policy, low-carbon transition, optimal climate policy, sustainable finance
    JEL: H23 O31 O44 Q55 Q58
    Date: 2023
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ven:wpaper:2023:07&r=ino
  3. By: Klaus Friesenbichler; Agnes Kügler; Julia Schieber-Knöbl (Statistics Austria)
    Abstract: We examine the role of intangible capital as a production factor using Austrian firm-level register data. Descriptive statistics show that intangible investment has increased over time. The intensive and extensive margins of firms' investments are highly skewed. They differ across sectors. A series of sample splits show that the components of intangible capital play different roles as inputs in the production function. Software and especially licenses are important for SMEs and exporters. Research and development play an important role in production in all specifications. For firms that continuously invest in intangible capital, all components of intangible capital gain importance in the production functions. These patterns differ from those found in previous studies and have implications for the strategic orientation of industrial and innovation policy.
    Keywords: Intangible capital, R&D, Firm level productivity, Investment, Production function, Austria
    Date: 2023–05–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:wfo:wpaper:y:2023:i:660&r=ino

This nep-ino issue is ©2023 by Uwe Cantner. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.