nep-ino New Economics Papers
on Innovation
Issue of 2015‒06‒05
nine papers chosen by
Steffen Lippert
University of Auckland

  1. Networking, context and firm-level innovation: Cooperation through the regional filter in Norway By Fitjar, Rune Dahl; Rodriguez-Pose, Andres
  2. A New Approach to Estimation of the R&D-Innovation-Productivity Relationship By Baum, Christopher F; Lööf, Hans; Nabavi, Pardis; Stephan, Andreas
  3. International Technology Diffusion of Joint and Cross-border Patents (Revised version) By Chia-Lin Chang; Michael McAleer; Ju-Ting Tang
  4. Trade Liberalization and Optimal R&D Policies with Process Innovation By Thanh Le; Cuong Le Van
  5. Unraveling the link between managerial risk-taking and innovation: The mediating role of a risk-taking climate By Ana García-Granero; Óscar Llopis; Anabel Fernández-Mesa; Joaquín Alegre
  6. On firms’ product space evolution: the role of firm and local product relatedness By Alessia Lo Turco; Daniela Maggioni
  7. Optimal licensing of uncertain patents in the shadow of litigation By Rabah Amir; David Encaoua; Yassine Lefouili
  8. Knowledge externalities and knowledge creation: the role of inventors’ working relationships and mobility By Favaro, Donata; Ninka, Eniel; Turvani, Margherita
  9. Transitional Dynamics in an R&D-based Growth Model with Natural Resources By Thanh Le; Cuong Le Van

  1. By: Fitjar, Rune Dahl; Rodriguez-Pose, Andres
    Abstract: The paper assesses the role for innovation of one aspect which has been generally overlooked by evolutionary economic geography: context. It analyses how context shapes the impact of collaboration on firm-level innovation for 1604 firms located in the five largest city regions of Norway. Specifically, the analysis shows how the benefits to firms of collaborating within regional, national, and international innovation networks are affected by the knowledge endowments of the region within which the firm is located. Using a logit regression analysis, we find, first, that only national and international networking have a significant positive impact on the likelihood of innovation (the former only for process innovation), whereas the regional knowledge endowments have no direct effect. Second, regional cooperation is particularly effective in regions with high investments in R&D, whereas international cooperation is important in regions with an educated workforce – and regional and national collaboration may be ineffective in such cases. We conclude that, in the case of Norway, context is essential in determining the capacity of firms to set up networks and innovate. Regions with an educated workforce can use the resulting absorptive capacity to successfully assimilate knowledge being diffused through global pipelines from faraway places. However, this absorptive capacity is likely to be heavily filtered if regional firms mainly rely on internal connections within Norway.
    Keywords: context; firms; human capital; innovation; interaction; networking; Norway; R&D
    JEL: O31 O32
    Date: 2015–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:10624&r=ino
  2. By: Baum, Christopher F (Department of Economics, Boston College and Department of Macroeconomics, DIW Berlin); Lööf, Hans (CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies, Royal Institute of Technology); Nabavi, Pardis (CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies, Royal Institute of Technology); Stephan, Andreas (Jönkoping International Business School and Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.)
    Abstract: We evaluate a Generalized Structural Equation Model (GSEM) approach to the estimation of the relationship between R&D, innovation and productivity that focuses on the potentially crucial heterogeneity across technology and knowledge levels. The model accounts for selectivity and handles the endogeneity of this relationship in a recursive framework. Employing a panel of Swedish firms observed in three consecutive Community Innovation Surveys, our maximum likelihood estimates show that many key channels of influence among the model's components differ meaningfully in their statistical significance and magnitude across sectors defined by different technology levels.
    Keywords: R&D; Innovation; Productivity; Generalized Structural Equation Model; Community Innovation Survey
    JEL: C23 L60 O32 O52
    Date: 2015–06–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hhs:cesisp:0408&r=ino
  3. By: Chia-Lin Chang (Department of Applied Economics, Department of Finance, National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan); Michael McAleer (Econometric Institute, Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam and Tinbergen Institute, The Netherlands, Department of Quantitative Economics, Complutense University of Madrid, and Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University.); Ju-Ting Tang (Department of Applied Economics National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan.)
    Abstract: With the advent of globalization, economic and financial interactions among countries have become widespread. Given technological advancements, the factors of production can no longer be considered to be just labor and capital. In the pursuit of economic growth, every country has sensibly invested in international cooperation, learning, innovation, technology diffusion and knowledge. In this paper, we use a panel data set of 40 countries from 1981 to 2008 and a negative binomial model, using a novel set of cross-border patents and joint patents as proxy variables for technology diffusion, in order to investigate such diffusion. The empirical results suggest that, if it is desired to shift from foreign to domestic technology, it is necessary to increase expenditure on R&D for business enterprises and higher education, exports and technology. If the focus is on increasing bilateral technology diffusion, it is necessary to increase expenditure on R&D for higher education and technology.
    Keywords: International Technology Diffusion, Exports, Imports, Joint Patent, Cross-border Patent, R&D, Negative Binomial Panel Data.
    JEL: F14 F21 O30 O57 E30 E31 E52 C22 F15
    Date: 2013
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ucm:doicae:1506&r=ino
  4. By: Thanh Le (University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia); Cuong Le Van (IPAG - Business School, EEP-PSE - Ecole d'Économie de Paris - Paris School of Economics, VCREME - VanXuan Center of Research in Economics, Management and Environment - VanXuan Center of Research in Economics, Management and Environment, CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS)
    Abstract: We set up a theoretical framework to discuss the impact of trade liberalization and R&D policies on domestic exporting firms' incentive to innovate and social welfare. In this framework, exporting firms invest in R&D to reduce their production costs and, in return, receive R&D subsidies from the government. While firms target at maximizing their profits, the government aims to maximize the social welfare. We consider different settings of firm competition to explore their strategic behaviors as well as the government's strategic behavior at the policy stage. We find that trade liberalization in the foreign market always increases firms' output sales and social welfare and, in most cases, leads to higher R&D investments and productivity at firms as well as industry level. When firms are independent monopolies in the overseas market, it is optimal for the government not to provide any R&D subsidy. When goods are close substitutes, the social optimum can be achieved as a Nash equilibrium by applying an optimal R&D tax. Trade liberalization induces a higher R&D tax rate to be levied on firms. When firms also conduct business in the home market, it is always optimal for the government to provide firms with a financial support to their R&D activity. While this R&D subsidy is decreasing in the trade cost when firms are independent monopolies, its monotonicity in the trade costs is determined by the convexity of the R&D cost function when firms produce close substitutes.
    Date: 2014–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:cesptp:halshs-01130413&r=ino
  5. By: Ana García-Granero (INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), MTS - Management Technologique et Strategique - Grenoble École de Management (GEM)); Óscar Llopis (GREThA - Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée - CNRS - Université Montesquieu - Bordeaux 4, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV)); Anabel Fernández-Mesa (INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), Departament de Direcció d'Empreses - Universitat de València); Joaquín Alegre (GREThA - Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée - CNRS - Université Montesquieu - Bordeaux 4)
    Abstract: Scholars have proposed that taking risks in organizations is important for explaining innovation performance. Scholars traditionally have analyzed this link from two unconnected perspectives. From a managerial perspective, entrepreneurial orientation and leadership theories have been used to explain the positive relation between risk taking and innovation. From an employee perspective, creativity theory suggests that a risk-taking climate helps to explain innovative behaviors. However, there is little empirical research analyzing this link. This study examines the possibility of a connection between managers’ risk-taking propensities, employees’ risk-taking climate, and innovation performance. To do so, we test a quantitative model where the impact of the manager’ risk-taking propensity on innovation is mediated by its effect on employees’ risk-taking climate. Structural equation modeling is used to test the research hypotheses on a data set of 182 firms from the Spanish and Italian ceramic tile industry.
    Date: 2015–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:gemptp:hal-01137650&r=ino
  6. By: Alessia Lo Turco; Daniela Maggioni
    Abstract: We explore the role of firm and local product-specific capabilities in fostering the introduction of new products in the Turkish manufacturing. Firms' product space evolution is characterised by strong cognitive path dependence which, however, is relaxed by firm heterogeneity in terms of size, efficiency and international exposure. The introduction of new products in laggard Eastern regions, which is importantly related to the evolution of their industrial output, is mainly affected by firm internal product specific resources. On the contrary, product innovations in Western advanced regions hinge relatively more on the availability of suitable local competencies.
    Keywords: Product relatedness, Firm heterogeneity, Product Innovation
    JEL: D22 O53 O12
    Date: 2015–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:egu:wpaper:1517&r=ino
  7. By: Rabah Amir (University of Iowa [Iowa] - University of Iowa); David Encaoua (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS); Yassine Lefouili (Toulouse School of Economics - CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS)
    Abstract: This paper investigates the choice of a licensing mechanism by the holder of a patent whose validity is uncertain. We provide sufficient conditions of a general nature under which the licensor prefers to use a per-unit royalty contract. In particular we show that this is the case for the holders of weak patents if the strategic effect of an increase in a potential licensee's unit cost on the equilibrium industry profit is positive. The latter condition is shown to hold in a Cournot (resp. Bertrand) oligopoly with homogeneous (resp. differentiated) products under general assumptions on the demands faced by firms. As a byproduct of our analysis, we contribute to the literature on the cost paradox in oligopoly by offering some new insights of independent interest regarding the effects of cost variations on Cournot and Bertrand equilibria.
    Date: 2014
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-01087234&r=ino
  8. By: Favaro, Donata; Ninka, Eniel; Turvani, Margherita
    Abstract: We study the transmission of tacit knowledge arising from working relationships established by inventors and its impact on firms’ knowledge creation. First, we consider knowledge spillovers that originate through inventor working relationships that are not the result of collaboration agreements among patenting firms. Second, we analyse their effect on the creation of new knowledge as measured by companies’ patenting activity. The study focuses on the role played by geographical proximity. The analysis was carried out on the population of firms located in the Italian region of Veneto and is based upon the original OECD REGPAT database that records all patenting applications at EPO.
    Keywords: patenting activity, knowledge externalities, working relationships, mobility, geographical proximity
    JEL: J24 O3 R1
    Date: 2014–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:64527&r=ino
  9. By: Thanh Le (University of Queensland); Cuong Le Van (VCREME - VanXuan Center of Research in Economics, Management and Environment - VanXuan Center of Research in Economics, Management and Environment, CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS, IPAG Business School)
    Abstract: Upon introducing natural resources, both renewable and non-renewable, into an endogenous growth framework with R&D, this paper derives the transitional dynamics of an economy towards its long-run equilibrium. Using the Euler - Lagrange framework, this paper has succesfully figured out the optimal paths of the economy. It then shows the existence and uniqueness of a balanced growth path for each type of resources. The steady state is shown to be of a saddle point stability. Along the balanced growth path, it is found that a finite size resource sector coexists with other continuously growing sectors. The paper then examines long-run responses of the economy to various changes pertaining to innovative production condition, resource sector parameters as well as rate of time preference. It also shows that positive long-run growth will be sustained regardless the type of resources used.
    Date: 2014–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:cesptp:halshs-01114589&r=ino

This nep-ino issue is ©2015 by Steffen Lippert. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.