nep-ino New Economics Papers
on Innovation
Issue of 2014‒05‒24
nine papers chosen by
Steffen Lippert
University of Otago, Dunedin

  1. Do innovative inputs lead to different innovative outputs in mature and young firms? By Gabriele Pellegrino; Mariacristina Piva
  2. “Innovation Adoption and Productivity Growth: Evidence for Europe” By Rosina Moreno; Jordi Suriñach
  3. Productive Development Policies and Innovation Spillovers through Labor Force Mobility: The Case of the Brazilian Innovation Support System By Inter-American Development Bank (IDB); Ingtec; USP Research Group
  4. Explaining the Slow Pace of Energy Technological Innovation: Why Market Conditions Matter By Wei Jin; ZhongXiang Zhang
  5. Innovation, Product-Cycle Trade, and the Cross-Country Distribution of Income By Scott French
  6. Innovation and Innovation Policy in the Nordic Region By Fagerberg, Jan; Fosaas, Morten
  7. Knowledge Spillovers of Innovation Policy through Labor Mobility: An Impact Evaluation of the FONTAR Program in Argentina By Rodolfo Stucchi; Sofía Rojo; Alessandro Maffioli; Victoria Castillo
  8. Innovative business models for high-tech entrepreneurial ventures: the organizational design challenges By Colombo, Massimo G.; Mohammadi, Ali; Lamastra, Cristina Rossi
  9. The dynamics of knowledge-intensive sectors' knowledge base: Evidence from Biotechnology and Telecommunications By Jackie Krafft; Francesco Quatraro; Pier-Paolo Saviotti

  1. By: Gabriele Pellegrino (Barcelona Institute of Economics - University of Barcelona, Barcelona); Mariacristina Piva (DISCE, Università Cattolica)
    Abstract: This paper investigates the determinants of the choice of different types of innovative input (R&D and technological acquisitions) and their relationship with different innovative outputs (product and process innovation), distinguishing between firms of different ages (mature vs young). In order to do so we apply a nonlinear structural model estimated on the third and fourth waves of the Italian Community Innovation Survey (CIS). We find that firm and market characteristics play a distinct role in boosting different types of innovation activities for firms of different ages. In particular, while methods of appropriability and international market exposure are relevant for both forms of innovative input, cooperation in innovation activities appears to be important for increasing the level of investment in R&D but not for technological acquisition. Moreover, young firms show a higher level of sensitivity than their mature counterparts to sources of information regarding innovation when we consider the magnitude of their innovative effort. On the contrary, factors such as methods of appropriability and support for innovation appear to be more important for enhancing the level of investment in both R&D and technological acquisitions for the mature firms only. Finally, the two innovative inputs appear to be equally important in determining both forms of innovative output for the two sub-samples of firms.
    Keywords: R&D; Technological acquisition; Innovative outputs; Young firms
    JEL: O31
    Date: 2014–03
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ctc:serie2:dises1497&r=ino
  2. By: Rosina Moreno (Faculty of Economics, University of Barcelona); Jordi Suriñach (Faculty of Economics, University of Barcelona)
    Abstract: The idea in this paper is to provide an empirical verification of the relationship between innovation adoption and productivity growth. After a brief revision of the literature about the concept and main determinants of innovation adoption/diffusion, the paper provides empirical evidence of the above-mentioned relationship through means of descriptive statistics and subsequently, we study the impact that innovation adoption may have on productivity growth through a regression analysis. The analysis is made with the statistical information provided by the Community Innovation Survey in its third and fourth waves, which concern innovative activities carried out between 1998 and 2000 and between 2002 and 2004 respectively. The countries covered are the 25 EU Member States plus Iceland and Norway as well as Turkey.
    Keywords: Innovation, Innovation adoption, Productivity, Europe, Community Innovation Survey. JEL classification: C8, J61, O31, O33, R0
    Date: 2014–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:aqr:wpaper:201408&r=ino
  3. By: Inter-American Development Bank (IDB); Ingtec; USP Research Group
    Abstract: This paper focuses on two research problems. The first is to measure the direct impacts of innovation support measures in Brazil, and the second is to test the hypothesis of indirect effects of innovation policies on non-beneficiary firms through the labor mobility channel, whether resulting from direct support programs or indirect support via tax incentives. For this purpose, mobility is defined as the movement of workers in technical-scientific occupations, as identified by Araujo et al. (2009). It is found that, with the exception of a subvention program, direct support in the form of credit or cooperative projects fosters more innovative effort than tax incentives. Nonetheless, direct and tax- based incentives for innovation have different purposes, and sound innovation relies on both types of incentive.
    Keywords: Labor, Innovation, Industrial Policy, Productivity, Propensity-score matching, IDB-WP-459
    Date: 2013–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:idb:brikps:83714&r=ino
  4. By: Wei Jin; ZhongXiang Zhang
    Abstract: As a useful complement to numerous innovation policy studies from a normative perspective, this paper provides a positive framework to analyze the basic economic mechanism of energy technological innovation and explain its slow pace of technological progress. We find that the capital-intensiveness of energy technology is an inhibiting factor to catalyze market size effect and slows innovations and diffusions of energy technology in the market. We also show that the substantial homogeneity of energy products leads to both a monopolistic market structure on the supply side and a weak level of positive pecuniary externality on the demand side, both dampening the incentive of innovation. On the basis of our economic analysis, we recommend that a package of policy responses to accelerating energy innovation should include 1) downsizing â"heavy" assets of energy technologies; 2) deregulating monopolistic energy-supplying markets; and 3) differentiating the homogenous energy products.
    Keywords: The Economics of Technological Innovation, Market Size Effect, Love-for-variety effect, Energy Technology, IT Technology
    JEL: Q55 Q58 Q43 Q48 O31
    Date: 2014–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:een:ccepwp:1401&r=ino
  5. By: Scott French (School of Economics, Australian School of Business, the University of New South Wales)
    Abstract: This paper develops a quantitative, multi-country model of endogenous growth, international trade, and international knowledge flows in order to understand how access to both foreign products and technologies, together, influences innovation incentives and the world distribution of income. An endogenous product cycle arises in equilibrium, in which innovative countries engage in both horizontal and vertical research, while others far from the technological frontier specialize in learning about and applying research previously conducted abroad. The effect of trade barriers on the level and dispersion of income across countries is found to be larger than would be predicted by a static trade model, and the effect of access to international knowledge flows is also quantitatively important and dependent on trade flows. For instance, halving the cost of learning reduces income dispersion by 23%, while doing so after eliminating asymmetric international trade barriers reduces income dispersion by only 10%.
    Keywords: Income differences, Trade, Endogenous growth, Product cycle, Innovation, Productivity, Technology diffusion
    JEL: F11 F12 F14 O19 O31 O33 O40
    Date: 2014–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:swe:wpaper:2014-26&r=ino
  6. By: Fagerberg, Jan; Fosaas, Morten
    Abstract: This paper reports on a desk-study on innovation performance and policies influencing it in four Nordic countries. The study is entirely based on published sources, either on the web (Eurostat, the OECD, the World Bank etc.), or in the form of articles, books, reports and evaluations. The first section introduces the study and deals with conceptual issues. Section two contains a descriptive analysis of innovation activities in the Nordic area and a broader set of countries with which the Nordic countries may be compared with the help of data from the Community Innovation Survey (CIS) and other relevant sources. Section three of the paper, then, presents - for four Nordic countries – an analysis of their innovation policies and how these have evolved towards their present stance. Lessons and questions for further research are discussed in the fourth and final section.
    Keywords: Innovation, innovation policy, Nordic countries
    JEL: O25 O31 O38 O57
    Date: 2014
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:56114&r=ino
  7. By: Rodolfo Stucchi; Sofía Rojo; Alessandro Maffioli; Victoria Castillo
    Abstract: Although knowledge spillovers are at the core of the innovation policy's justification, they have never been properly measured by any impact evaluation. This paper fills this gap by estimating the spillover effects of the FONTAR program in Argentina. We use an employer-employee matched panel dataset with the entire population of firms and workers in Argentina for the period 2002-2010. This dataset allows us to track the mobility of qualified workers from FONTAR beneficiary firms to other firms and, therefore, to identify firms that indirectly benefit from the program through knowledge diffusion. We use a combination of fixed effect and matching to estimate the causal effect-direct and indirect-of the program on various measures of performance. Our findings are robust to a placebo test based on anticipatory effects and show that the program increased employment, wages, and the exporting probability of both direct and indirect beneficiaries. The analysis of the dynamic of these effects confirms that performance does not improve immediately after the treatment for neither direct nor indirect beneficiaries.
    Keywords: Workforce & Employment, Impact evaluation, Innovation, labor mobility
    Date: 2014–02
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:idb:brikps:83894&r=ino
  8. By: Colombo, Massimo G. (Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Italy); Mohammadi, Ali (CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies, Royal Institute of Technology); Lamastra, Cristina Rossi (Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Italy)
    Abstract: Entrepreneurial ventures operating in high-tech industries are more and more adopting innovative business models, which are based on use of the market for ideas instead of the market for products or on the leveraging of communities of users and developers. A common characteristic of these innovative business models is their dependence on innovative technological knowledge and, consequently, on the ways in which intellectual property rights over this knowledge are designed (i.e., tight vs. loose appropriability regime). This chapter grounds on mainstream organizational design theories to speculate on how high-tech entrepreneurial ventures should organize internally to successfully implement these innovative business models. Specifically, it analyzes how firms’ structure, decision rights, and human resource management practices should be adapted to the need of generating, absorbing, and protecting innovative technological knowledge. Heeding a recent call in management literature, we will conduct our analysis considering organizational design variables both at the individual and firm level.
    Keywords: business model innovation; brganizational design; high-tech entrepreneurial ventures
    JEL: L17 L22 L26 O31
    Date: 2014–05–21
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hhs:cesisp:0366&r=ino
  9. By: Jackie Krafft (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - CNRS : UMR7321 - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (UNS)); Francesco Quatraro (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - CNRS : UMR7321 - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (UNS)); Pier-Paolo Saviotti (GAEL - Grenoble Applied Economic laboratory - Aucune)
    Abstract: In this paper we present a methodology to represent and measure knowledge which takes into account knowledge heterogeneity and its sectoral level theoretical and empirical implications in knowledge intensive environments. We draw on work on recombinant knowledge, extending the approach to include: the way the dynamics of technological knowledge creation evolves according to a life cycle; testing the existence of concepts such as technological paradigms; mapping the characteristics of the search process in the phases of exploration and exploitation during this technology life cycle; and detecting the differences in sectoral evolution that can be explained by the properties of the knowledge base. We use European Patent Office data (1981-2005) to propose some operational metrics for the knowledge base and its evolution in two knowledge intensive sectors: biotechnology and telecommunications. Our empirical results show that there are interesting and meaningful differences across sectors, which are linked to the different phases of the technology life cycles.
    Keywords: knowledge base, knowledge intensive sectors, variety, coherence, cognitive distance, technological classes, patents
    Date: 2013–11–18
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00991397&r=ino

This nep-ino issue is ©2014 by Steffen Lippert. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.