nep-ino New Economics Papers
on Innovation
Issue of 2013‒12‒20
five papers chosen by
Steffen Lippert
University of Otago, Dunedin

  1. Quantity or quality? Knowledge alliances and their effects on patenting By Hottenrott, Hanna; Lopes-Bento, Cindy
  2. (International) R&D collaboration and SMEs: The effectiveness of targeted public R&D support schemes By Hottenrott, Hanna; Lopes-Bento, Cindy
  3. High growth firms, innovation and competition: the case of the US pharmaceutical industry By Mariana Mazzucato; Stuart Parris
  4. On the Obituary of Scientific Knowledge Monopoly By Asongu , Simplice A
  5. Interdisciplinarity and research on local issues: evidence from a developing country By Diego Chavarro; Puay Tang; Ismael Rafols

  1. By: Hottenrott, Hanna; Lopes-Bento, Cindy
    Abstract: This study shows for a large sample of R&D-active manufacturing firms over the period 2000-2009 that knowledge alliances have a positive effect on patenting in terms of both quantity and quality. However, when distinguishing between alliances that aim at joint creation of new knowledge and alliances that aim at the exchange of knowledge, results suggest that creation alliances lead to more valuable patents as they receive significantly more forward citations per patent. Knowledge exchange alliances, on the other hand, are associated with patent quantity, but not quality. --
    Keywords: Knowledge Alliances,Patents,Innovation,R&D,Count Data Models
    JEL: O31 O32 O33 O34
    Date: 2013
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:dicedp:122&r=ino
  2. By: Hottenrott, Hanna; Lopes-Bento, Cindy
    Abstract: This study analyses the impact and effectiveness of targeted public support for R&D investment at the firm level. We test whether the policy design aiming at incentivizing (international) collaboration and R&D in SMEs achieves input as well as output additionality. Our results show that the targeted public subsidies trigger R&D spending, especially so in internationally collaborating SMEs. We further evaluate the different impact of privately financed and publicly-induced R&D investment on innovation performance. The results confirm that the publicly-induced R&D is productive as it translates into marketable product innovations. While both types of R&D investments trigger significant output effects, the effect of policyinduced R&D investment on sales from market novelties is highest for international collaborators as well as for SMEs. --
    Keywords: Public Innovation Policy,Subsidies,R&D,SMEs,International Collaboration,Treatment Effects
    JEL: C14 C30 H23 O31 O38
    Date: 2013
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:dicedp:121&r=ino
  3. By: Mariana Mazzucato (SPRU, University of Sussex, UK); Stuart Parris (Faculty of Economics, Open University, UK)
    Keywords: R&D, Growth, Venture capitalist, quantile regression, pharmaceutical industry
    Date: 2013–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:sru:ssewps:2013-16&r=ino
  4. By: Asongu , Simplice A
    Abstract: The August 15th 2013 Shanghai Academic Rankings of World Universities (ARWU) should leave policy makers wondering about whether the impressive growth experienced by ‘latecomers in the industry' has moved hand-in-hand with contribution to knowledge by means of scientific publications. Against this background, we model the obituary of scientific knowledge monopoly in 99 countries using 21 catch-up panels from 6 regions (South Asia, Europe & Central Asia, East Asia & the Pacific, Middle East & North Africa, Latin America & the Caribbean and, Sub-Saharan Africa). The findings broadly show that the obituary of scientific knowledge monopoly by developed countries is not in the near-horizon. Advanced nations that have mastered the dynamics of knowledge monopoly will continue to lead the course of knowledge economy. Justifications for the patterns and policy implications are discussed.
    Keywords: Research & Development; Catch-up; Knowledge Economy
    JEL: F42 O10 O30 O38 O57
    Date: 2013–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:52207&r=ino
  5. By: Diego Chavarro (SPRU, University of Sussex, UK); Puay Tang (SPRU, University of Sussex, UK); Ismael Rafols (SPRU, University of Sussex, UK)
    Keywords: Interdisciplinary research, S&T capabilities, local knowledge, research assesment, excellence, socio-economic impact
    Date: 2013–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:sru:ssewps:2013-14&r=ino

This nep-ino issue is ©2013 by Steffen Lippert. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.