nep-ino New Economics Papers
on Innovation
Issue of 2013‒06‒04
37 papers chosen by
Steffen Lippert
University of Otago, Dunedin

  1. Inside innovation persistence: New evidence from Italian micro-data. By Antonelli,Cristiano; Crespi, Francesco; Scellato, Giuseppe
  2. Dynamic Models of R&D, Innovation and Productivity: Panel Data Evidence for Dutch and French Manufacturing By Wladimir Raymond; Jacques Mairesse; Pierre Mohnen; Franz Palm
  3. Public Policy, Induced Innovation, and Private Research: The Case of Agriculture By Tokgoz, Simla; Fuglie, Keith
  4. How do ICT firms in Turkey manage innovation? Diversity in expertise versus diversity in markets. By Akçomakn Semih; Akdeve, Erdal; Findik, Derya
  5. Emergence of Innovation Networks from R&D Cooperation with Endogenous Absorptive Capacity By Ivan Savin; Abiodun Egbetokun
  6. Global R&D network. A network analysis of international R&D centres. By Giuditta De Prato; Daniel Nepelski
  7. Does external knowledge affect environmental innovations? An empirical investigation of eleven European countries. By Ghisetti,Claudia; Marzucchi,Alberto; Montresor,Sandro
  8. Institutions, competition and regulation: Intellectual property and innovation By Tucker, C.E.
  9. Determinants of Innovative Activities: Evidence from Europe and Central Asia Region By Lau, Chi Keung Marco; Yang, Fu Steve; Zhang, Zhe; Leung, Vincent K.K.
  10. The Importance (or not) of Patents to UK Firms By Bronwyn H. Hall; Christian Helmers; Mark Rogers; Vania Sena
  11. Compulsory licensing: the foundations of an institutional innovation By Antonelli Cristiano
  12. Entrepreneurship, innovation and the triple helix model: evidence from Oxfordshire and Cambridgeshire By Helen Lawton Smith
  13. Properties of knowledge base and firm survival: Evidence from a sample of French manufacturing firms By Colombelli Alessandra; Krafft.Jackie; Quatraro Francesco
  14. Innovative public procurement and R&D Subsidies: hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the technology policy mix in a quasi-experimental setting By Guerzoni, Marco; Raiteri, Emilio
  15. Demand pull and technological flows within innovation systems: the intra-European evidence By Antonelli,Cristiano; Gehringer, Agnieszka
  16. Knowledge cumulability and complementarity in the knowledge generation function By Antonelli,Cristiano; Colombelli, Alessandra
  17. Optimal Capital Versus Labor Taxation with Innovation-Led Growth By Philippe Aghion; Ufuk Akcigit; Jesús Fernández-Villaverde
  18. The democratisation of innovation: Managing technological innovation as if people matter By PH Spies
  19. Innovation is in the (clean) air: The inclusion of aviation in the EU emissions trading scheme as a driver of innovation in air transport By Lykotrafiti, A.A.
  20. “Firm exports, innovation, … and regions” By Enrique López-Bazo; Elisabet Motellón
  21. Internal and external factors in innovation persistence By Antonelli, Cristiano; Crespi, Francesco; Scellato, Giuseppe
  22. Academic inventions outside the university: A result of industry sponsorship or entrepreneurial activities? By Lawson, Cornelia
  23. University Knowledge, Originality of Patents and the Creation of New Industries By Guerzoni, Marco; Aldridge, Taylor; Audretsch, David B; Sameeksha, Desai
  24. Comparing Innovation Performance in the EU and the USA: Lessons from Three ICT Sub-Sectors By Simon Forge; Colin Blackman; Itzhak Goldberg; Federico Biagi
  25. The ownership of academic patents and their impact. Evidence from five European countries By Lissoni, Francesco; Montobbio, Fabio
  26. International patenting strategies in ICT. By Giuditta De Prato; Daniel Nepelski
  27. The role of early career factors in academic patenting By Lawson Cornelia; Sterzi Valerio
  28. The R&D Tax Credit in France: Assessment and Ex-Ante Evaluation of the 2008 Reform By Benoît Mulkay; Jacques Mairesse
  29. Does the Patent Cooperation Treaty work? A global analysis of patent applications by non-residents. By Daniel Nepelski; Giuditta De Prato
  30. The globalization of technology in emerging markets: a gravity model on the determinants of international patent collaborations By Montobbio Fabio; Sterzi Valerio
  31. Unveiling diffusion dynamics: an autocatalytic percolation model of environmental innovation diffusion and the optimal dynamic path of adoption subsidies By Cantono, Simona
  32. Knowledge externalities and demand pull: The European evidence By Antonelli,Cristiano; Gehringer,Agnieszka
  33. The Shapley value as a guide to FRAND licensing agreements By DEHEZ, Pierre; POUKENS, SOPHIE
  34. Research Grants, Sources of Ideas and the Effects on Academic Research By Hottenrott, Hanna; Lawson, Cornelia
  35. Inventorship and authorship as attribution rights: An enquiry into the economics of scientific credit By Lissoni, Francesco; Fabio, Montobbio
  36. Royalty Rate Determination By Peter Dawson
  37. Science, Technology and Innovation in Peru 2000-2012: The Case of Services By Mario D. Tello

  1. By: Antonelli,Cristiano; Crespi, Francesco; Scellato, Giuseppe (University of Turin)
    Abstract: This paper contributes the analysis of the persistence of innovation activities, as measured by different innovation indicators and explores its past and path dependent characteristics. The study provides new insights on the role of R&D investments in innovation persistence and analyses differentiated patterns of persistence across product and process innovation, by accounting for complementarity effects between the two types of innovative behaviour. The empirical analysis is based on a sample of 451 Italian manufacturing companies observed during the years 1998-2006, and exploits both descriptive techniques such as Transition Probability Matrix and econometric methods based on dynamic probit models. Results highlight the relevance of innovation persistence. The highest level of persistence is found for R&D-based innovation activities, witnessing the actual presence of significant entry and exit barriers. Moreover, we obtain more robust evidence of persistence for product innovation than for process innovation when complementarity effects between the two types of innovation are accounted for.
    Date: 2012–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uto:labeco:201213&r=ino
  2. By: Wladimir Raymond; Jacques Mairesse; Pierre Mohnen; Franz Palm
    Abstract: This paper introduces dynamics in the R&D to innovation and innovation to productivity relationships, which have mostly been estimated on cross-sectional data. It considers four nonlinear dynamic simultaneous equations models that include individual effects and idiosyncratic errors correlated across equations and that differ in the way innovation enters the conditional mean of labor productivity: through an observed binary indicator, an observed intensity variable or through the continuous latent variables that correspond to the observed occurrence or intensity. It estimates these models by full information maximum likelihood using two unbalanced panels of Dutch and French manufacturing firms from three waves of the Community Innovation Survey. The results provide evidence of robust unidirectional causality from innovation to productivity and of stronger persistence in productivity than in innovation.
    JEL: C33 C34 C35 L60 O31 O32
    Date: 2013–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19074&r=ino
  3. By: Tokgoz, Simla; Fuglie, Keith
    Keywords: research and development, private R&D spending, public policy, Research and Development/Tech Change/Emerging Technologies,
    Date: 2013
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea13:149613&r=ino
  4. By: Akçomakn Semih (TEKPOL, Middle East Technical University, and UNU-MERIT); Akdeve, Erdal (School of Management, Yıldırım Beyazıt University); Findik, Derya (TEKPOL, Middle East Technical University)
    Abstract: This paper provides a novel taxonomy of firms based on specialization versus diversification in production and markets. Firms may choose to specialize on few production activities or alternatively may build expertise in many activities. There is an accompanying decision when firms sell their products: whether to serve few or many markets. We argue that the location on the specialization-diversification spectrum significantly affects how firms manage innovation. For a sample of 90 innovator ICT firms in Ankara we find that cooperation structure, sources of innovation and funding of R&D display statistically significant different patterns according to the specialization-diversification taxonomy.
    Keywords: management of innovation, core competency, expertise building, R&D, ICT
    JEL: O32 L22 L86
    Date: 2013
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dgr:unumer:2013024&r=ino
  5. By: Ivan Savin (DFG Research Training Program "The Economics of Innovative Change", Friedrich Schiller University Jena and the Max Planck Institute of Economics); Abiodun Egbetokun (DFG Research Training Program "The Economics of Innovative Change", Friedrich Schiller University Jena and the Max Planck Institute of Economics)
    Abstract: This paper extends the existing literature on strategic R&D alliances by presenting a model of innovation networks with endogenous absorptive capacity. The networks emerge as a result of bilateral cooperation over time between firms occupying different locations in the knowledge space. Social capital is ignored, and firms ally purely on the basis of knowledge considerations. Partner selection is driven largely by absorptive capacity which is itself influenced by cognitive distance and investment allocation between inventive and absorptive R&D. Cognitive distance between firms changes as a function of the intensity of cooperation and innovation. Within different knowledge regimes, we examine the structure of networks that emerge and how firms perform within such networks. Our model replicates some stylised empirical results on network structure and the contingent effects of network position on innovative performance. We find networks that exhibit small world properties which are generally robust to changes in the knowledge regime. Second, subject to the extent of knowledge spillovers, certain network strategies such as occupying brokerage positions or maximising accessibility to potential partners pay off. Third and most importantly, absorptive capacity plays an important role in network evolution: firms with different network strategies indeed differ in the build-up of absorptive capacity.
    Keywords: absorptive capacity, agent-based modeling, cognitive distance, dynam- ics, innovation, knowledge spillovers, networks
    JEL: C61 C63 D83 D85 L14 O33
    Date: 2013–05–22
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:jrp:jrpwrp:2013-022&r=ino
  6. By: Giuditta De Prato (European Commission – JRC - IPTS); Daniel Nepelski (European Commission – JRC - IPTS)
    Abstract: A firm's decision to establish an R&D centre in a specific location creates externalities affecting other firms and, thus, a random distribution of location choices is unlikely. Expecting that the global distribution of R&D centres fulfils the criteria of a complex network, we apply social network analysis to study the locations of international R&D centres and the relationships between the countries owning and hosting them. We analyse the characteristics of the global R&D network and identify its core members. Further, we include network indices in an empirical analysis of the R&D internationalisation determinants. We find that a country's position in the network, which does not necessarily coincide with its geographical or cultural proximity to other countries, has a significant impact on the formation and intensity of R&D linkages between countries. We provide policy implications addressing the challenges emerging from the increasing internationalisation and network of R&D.
    Keywords: globalisation of innovation, location of R&D centres, network analysis, gravity model
    JEL: D8 O32 L23
    Date: 2012–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc79478&r=ino
  7. By: Ghisetti,Claudia; Marzucchi,Alberto; Montresor,Sandro
    Abstract: This paper investigates the effects that knowledge sources external to the firm have on its environmental innovations (EIs). Using the CIS 2006-2008, we refer to both the probability to introduce an EI and the number of EI-typologies adopted by firms. We estimate the impact of the “depth” and “breadth” of knowledge sourcing. In addition, we test for the moderating role of the firm's absorptive capacity. In general, knowledge sourcing has a positive impact on both types of EI-performance. However, a broad sourcing strategy reveals a threshold, over which the propensity to introduce an EI diminishes. Cognitive constraints in processing knowledge inputs that are too diverse could explain this result. Absorptive capacity generally helps firms in turning broadly sourced external knowledge into EI. Conversely, internal innovation capabilities and knowledge socialization mechanisms seem to diminish the EI impact of knowledge sourced through intense external interactions. The possibility of mismatches between internal and external knowledge and problems in distributing the decision-makers’ attention between the two could explain this result.
    Keywords: Environmental Innovation, Open Innovation, Absorptive Capacity
    JEL: Q55 O31 O32
    Date: 2013–05–23
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ing:wpaper:201301&r=ino
  8. By: Tucker, C.E. (Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economics Center)
    Date: 2012
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dgr:kubtil:2012030&r=ino
  9. By: Lau, Chi Keung Marco; Yang, Fu Steve; Zhang, Zhe; Leung, Vincent K.K.
    Abstract: Recent studies in the innovation literature reveal that Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) promotes the innovation activities in the recipent country through spillover effects. In this paper we extend the existing literature by incooprating the corruption index in the estimation procedure. Using a cross-country analysis from the Europe and Central Asia (ECA) region , covering 57 countries over the period of 1995-2010, we find no evidence of FDI spillover effect on innovative activity. However, corporate corruption and expenditure on education sector are positively related to the number of patents applications. Our study shed light on the national innovation activities and anti-corruption programs.
    Keywords: Foreign direct investment; Corruption; Innovation; Technology transfer
    JEL: D73 F21 O32 O34 O38
    Date: 2013–01–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:47153&r=ino
  10. By: Bronwyn H. Hall; Christian Helmers; Mark Rogers; Vania Sena
    Abstract: A surprisingly small number of innovative firms use the patent system. In the UK, the share of firms patenting among those reporting that they have innovated is about 4%. Survey data from the same firms support the idea that they do not consider patents or other forms of registered IP as important as informal IP for protecting inventions. We show that there are a number of explanations for these findings: most firms are SMEs, many innovations are new to the firm, but not to the market, and many sectors are not patent active. We find evidence pointing to a positive association between patenting and innovative performance measured as turnover due to innovation, but not between patenting and subsequent employment growth. The analysis relies on a new integrated dataset for the UK that combines a range of data sources into a panel at the enterprise level.
    JEL: L21 L25 O34
    Date: 2013–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19089&r=ino
  11. By: Antonelli Cristiano (University of Turin)
    Abstract: Compulsory licensing is an important institutional innovation that improves the knowledge governance and can help fostering the pace of generation of technological knowledge and the rate of introduction of technological innovations. Recent advances in the economics of knowledge have confirmed the medieval wisdom according to which to make knowledge it is necessary to stand on giants’ shoulders. The generation of new technological knowledge is possible only if the stock of existing knowledge can be used as an input. All barriers and delays in the access to existing knowledge risk to reducing the capability to generate new technological knowledge. Intellectual property right regimes based upon exclusivity may increase the incentives to generate new technological knowledge but reduce the efficiency and the actual viability of the knowledge generation process. The costs of the reduction in the access to existing knowledge are larger the larger the scope of application of new technology. Compulsory licensing for technological knowledge can increase the rate of generation of new technological knowledge. The paper contributes the debate with a simple model that enables to identify the correct levels of royalties for compulsory licensing in both product and knowledge markets.
    Date: 2012–02
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uto:labeco:201207&r=ino
  12. By: Helen Lawton Smith (Department of Management, Birkbeck College University of London)
    Date: 2013–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:img:wpaper:12&r=ino
  13. By: Colombelli Alessandra; Krafft.Jackie; Quatraro Francesco (University of Turin)
    Abstract: The paper analyzes the effects of the properties of firms’ knowledge base on the survival likelihood of firms. Drawing upon the analysis of the patterns of co-occurrence of technological classes in patent applications, we derive the coherence, variety and cognitive distance indexes, accounting respectively for technological complementarity, differentiation and (dis)similarity in the firms’ patent portfolios. The results of our analysis are in line with the previous literature, showing that innovation enhances the survival likelihood of firms. In addition, we show that the search strategies at work in the development of firms’ knowledge base matter in reducing the likelihood of a failure event. Knowledge coherence and variety appear to be positively related to firms’ survival, while cognitive distance exerts a negative effect. We conclude that firms able to exploit the accumulated technological competences have more chances to be successful in competing durably in the market arena, and derive some policy implications concerning the role of public intervention in the orientation of search efforts in local contexts.
    Date: 2012–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uto:labeco:201209&r=ino
  14. By: Guerzoni, Marco; Raiteri, Emilio (University of Turin)
    Abstract: This paper provides new empirical evidence about the impact of technological policies upon firms’ innovative behavior. We take into consideration the role of R&D subsidies and innovative public procurement. While the former policy tool has been both extensively discussed in the literature and empirically investigated, the latter is a growing trend, which still lacks robust empirical evidence. In this paper, we replicate existing results on R&D subsidies, we surmise fresh empirical evidence on the outcome of innovative public procurement, and we address the issue of a possible interaction among the two tools. When controlling for this interaction of public procurement, R&D subsidies cease to be as effective as reported in previous studies. Innovative public procurement seems to be more effective than R&D subsidies. Evidence suggests that the two policies provide the highest impact when they interact and that they have to be simultaneously considered. Failure in doing so might lead to biased results.
    Date: 2012–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uto:labeco:201218&r=ino
  15. By: Antonelli,Cristiano; Gehringer, Agnieszka (University of Turin)
    Abstract: We investigate the demand pull effects on sector-level total factor productivity growth. Such effects stem from the knowledge interactions carried by the market Transactions of intermediate inputs between competent customers and innovative suppliers. Both knowledge interactions and transactions are substantial ingredients in making the competent demand operate the positive impact on productivity growth of the entire economic system. The demand pull hypothesis is, thus, rejuvenated through the focus on the inter-sectoral linkages between competent users and innovative producers. In the empirical analysis based on a dynamic panel technique, we implement intermediate flows from input-output tables, qualified by productivity increases downstream, in order to investigate their joint influence on the upstream growth of productivity. The evidence Union of the derived demand-driven influence regarding the European (EU) over the period 1995-2007 is strong and positive, but varies between three EU innovation systems, EU core, East and South.
    Date: 2013–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uto:labeco:201301&r=ino
  16. By: Antonelli,Cristiano; Colombelli, Alessandra (University of Turin)
    Abstract: This paper explores the role of external knowledge and internal stocks of knowledge in the generation of new technological knowledge. It relies on the notion of recombination and brings together three concepts: the appreciation of current expenses in R&D activities; the analysis of the role of the stock of knowledge composition; the identification of the role of external knowledge available in the regional proximity. The empirical section is based upon a panel of companies listed on the main European financial markets for the period 1995–2006. The econometric analysis considers patents as a measure of the knowledge out put and, on the right hand side, next to R&D expenditures, the stock of knowledge internal and external to each firm. The results confirm that the stock of internal knowledge and the access to external knowledge play a key role in assessing the actual capability of each firm to generate new knowledge.
    Date: 2013–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uto:labeco:201303&r=ino
  17. By: Philippe Aghion; Ufuk Akcigit; Jesús Fernández-Villaverde
    Abstract: Chamley (1986) and Judd (1985) showed that, in a standard neoclassical growth model with capital accumulation and infinitely lived agents, either taxing or subsidizing capital cannot be optimal in the steady state. In this paper, we introduce innovation-led growth into the Chamley-Judd framework, using a Schumpeterian growth model where productivity-enhancing innovations result from profit-motivated R&D investment. Our main result is that, for a given required trend of public expenditure, a zero tax/subsidy on capital becomes suboptimal. In particular, the higher the level of public expenditure and the income elasticity of labor supply, the less should capital income be subsidized and the more it should be taxed. Not taxing capital implies that labor must be taxed at a higher rate. This in turn has a detrimental effect on labor supply and therefore on the market size for innovation. At the same time, for a given labor supply, taxing capital also reduces innovation incentives, so that for low levels of public expenditure and/or labor supply elasticity it becomes optimal to subsidize capital income.
    JEL: H2 O3 O4
    Date: 2013–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19086&r=ino
  18. By: PH Spies (Institute for Futures Research, University of Stellenbosch)
    Abstract: Innovation is the transformation of a new idea or scientific discovery into technology through introducing, applying, and integrating it in common practice. The outcome is that people can progressively do more with the same effort, produce different outcomes with the same artefacts and produce outcomes in new and novel ways. Historically this process favoured the (largely Western-style) industrial world and today some 85 percent of global wealth is owned by just 10 percent of the global population. Empoverished people seem to find themselves in a low level human development trap. The focus of this working paper is on innovation management in less-developed poor communities. Its central hypothesis is that endemic (human-centred) technological innovation rather than ‘technology transfer’ (artefact-centred innovation) can help to alleviate this situation. Two concepts from the natural sciences serve as metaphors for the intrinsic systemic and embodied nature of sustainable technological innovation: • ‘Ecosystem’ to highlight the determining role of interactivity with the circumstances under which people exist; and • ‘Endemic’ to highlight the importance of intrinsic innovativeness as both an outcome and a cause of human development. The paper postulates that the innovation challenge is perhaps less procedural and more conceptual, namely to discover the recursive link between technological innovation and human development. It approaches technological innovation as a holistic, human-centred, systemic process. It argues that effective application of technological artefacts is only possible with the support of a complex system of socio-economic conditions. An outline for conceptualising, planning and managing innovation for human development is presented in the concluding sections of the paper.
    Keywords: Innovation, human development, ecosystem, endemic, competence, motivation
    JEL: I3 O3
    Date: 2013
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:sza:wpaper:wpapers185&r=ino
  19. By: Lykotrafiti, A.A. (Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economics Center)
    Date: 2012
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dgr:kubtil:2012033&r=ino
  20. By: Enrique López-Bazo (Faculty of Economics, University of Barcelona); Elisabet Motellón (Faculty of Economics, University of Barcelona)
    Abstract: This paper uses firm-level data for each of the Spanish NUTS2 regions to estimate the effect of product and process innovations on firm’s export performance. It shows that the firm’s propensity to innovate and its export activity vary substantially across regions. Remarkably, results prove that the effect of innovation on exports is far from regionally uniform. The gap in the propensity to export between innovative and non-innovative firms, conditional to other sources of firm heterogeneity, is shown to be particularly wide in regions with high extensive margin of exports. However, differences in the propensity to innovate do not originate regional disparities in the share of sales abroad by exporting firms. Consequently, stimulate firm’s innovation in the less innovative regions can be an effective tool to increase the share of exporting firms.
    Keywords: export propensity, export intensity, product and process innovations, Spanish regions, firm heterogeneity. JEL classification: F14, R10.
    Date: 2013–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:aqr:wpaper:201305&r=ino
  21. By: Antonelli, Cristiano; Crespi, Francesco; Scellato, Giuseppe (University of Turin)
    Abstract: This paper contributes the analysis of the persistence of innovation activities, as measured by total factor productivity (TFP) and explores its internal and external determinants stressing its path dependent characteristics. The external conditions, namely the quality of local knowledge pools and the strength of the Schumpeterian rivalry, together with the internal conditions, that is the actual levels of dynamic capabilities, as proxied by the levels of wages and the size of firms, exert a specific and localized effect upon the persistent introduction of innovations. A Multiple Transition Probability Matrixes (MTPMs) approach has been implemented to grasp the contingent effects of external effects on the long-term innovation persistence. The empirical analysis of the dynamics of firm level TFP for a sample of about 7000 Italian manufacturing companies observed during the years1996-2005 is based on both the comparison of different transition probability matrixes and on dynamic discrete choice panel data models. The evidence provided by the test of MTPMs in sub-periods suggests that innovation persistence is path dependent, as opposed to past dependent.
    Date: 2012–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uto:labeco:201211&r=ino
  22. By: Lawson, Cornelia (University of Turin)
    Abstract: This paper investigates the link between firms and academic inventors on firm-assigned academic patents for a sample of UK academics. The first descriptive results show that 43% of firm assigned patents are in fact owned by a university spin-off. The empirical analysis finds that a strong appropriation regime at a university encourages patents owned by the university or its spin-offs. Public research funds and technology transfer grants are also associated with university or spin-off owned patent s. Government incentives and funding regulations thus are a successful strategy to encourage and maintain university ownership of patents. Industry sponsorship on the other hand encourages firm ownership of patents, whether these are private firms or university spin-offs. A more detailed analysis of funding links shows that 41% of non-spin-off firms also have funding agreements with the university; however, the remaining 59% of firms have no apparent link to researchers that could explain ownership of university inventions.
    Date: 2012–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uto:labeco:201216&r=ino
  23. By: Guerzoni, Marco; Aldridge, Taylor; Audretsch, David B; Sameeksha, Desai (University of Turin)
    Abstract: Scientific breakthroughs emanating from universities can be a trigger for the emergence of new industries such as in the paradigmatic case of biotechnology. Obviously, not all research conducted in the universities leads to radical departure from the existing technological trajectories. When a patent protection is granted to a discovery, it is possible to construct a proxy for the originality of the discovery based on patent citations. Patent originality has been long recognized in fostering the emergence of new technologies and industries. However, while a large body of literature exists measuring the impact of patent originality on a broad range of measures of firm performance, this paper aims at investigating the conditions driving patent originality. In particular, in providing the first empirical examination of the determinants of patent originality, this paper finds that the research context, as reflected by the funding source for the scientist, influences the extent to which intellectual property protected by a patent is original. Eventually, we propose that university scientists funded by their university, which has a more fundamental mission, have a higher propensity to generate patents that are more original. By contrast, university scientists funded either by industry or other non-university organizations have a lower propensity to generate more original patents.
    Date: 2012–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uto:labeco:201219&r=ino
  24. By: Simon Forge (SCF Associates Ltd); Colin Blackman (Camford Associates); Itzhak Goldberg (CASE (Center for Social and Economic Research)); Federico Biagi (European Commission – JRC - IPTS)
    Abstract: The objective of the study is to document the existence of innovation gaps between the EU and its main competitors in specific ICT sub-sectors – namely web services, industrial robotics and display technologies –and to explore the role of government policies in Europe’s future needs for innovation in information and communication technologies (ICT) through a comparison with the USA and Asian countries. Our analysis shows that rather than there being a simple innovation gap with the EU lagging behind the USA, a more nuanced picture emerges in which firms in different countries have strengths in different sub-sectors and in different parts of the value chain. A key lesson from the analysis of the three subsectors is the critical importance of higher education, particularly elite university research, and of local networks as generated by clusters. Governments can also encourage innovation through appropriate intellectual property and competition laws and, more generally, through the development of a business environment conducive to innovation. Finally, Governments can have a very important role through the funding of early-stage innovation
    Keywords: ICT, Innovation policy, Industrial policy
    JEL: L5 L6 L8
    Date: 2013–03
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc81448&r=ino
  25. By: Lissoni, Francesco; Montobbio, Fabio (University of Turin)
    Abstract: This paper compares the value and impact of academic patents in five different European countries with different institutional frameworks: Denmark, France, Italy, the Netherlands, and Sweden. Ownership patterns of academic patents are found to: (i) differ greatly across country, due to a combination of legal norms on IP and institutional features of the university system; (ii) be strongly associated to academic patents' value, as measured by patent citations. Company-owned academic patents tend to be as cited as non-academic ones, while university-owned tend to be less cited. Academic patents in the Netherlands are more cited than non-academic ones, irrespective to their ownership, while university-owned patents get fewer citations in both France and Italy. We propose an explanation of these results based on the different autonomy and experience in dealing with IP and technology transfer enjoyed by universities in the countries considered. We also find that company-owned academic patents in Sweden get many fewer citations than non-academic. Individually-owned academic patents are more cited than non-academic patents similarly owned by their inventors.
    Date: 2012–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uto:labeco:201220&r=ino
  26. By: Giuditta De Prato (European Commission – JRC - IPTS); Daniel Nepelski (European Commission – JRC - IPTS)
    Abstract: We study the drivers of international patent applications in ICT technologies by non-residents. We construct bilateral measures of foreign patent applications for all countries active as both a source of patents and a destination of applications filed between 1990 and 2007 to any patent office in the world. Despite the global character of the ICT industry, applicants from different regions follow different patenting strategies, only Japanese and US applicants are exceptionally active in seeking for patent protection in the majority of world markets. Applying a gravity model to explain the determinants of seeking patent protection in foreign markets, we find that economic and inventive capacity of a country attracts foreign patent applications.
    Keywords: IPR protection, patenting strategies, international patenting, ICT, gravity model
    JEL: D8 F2 O30 O31 O57
    Date: 2012–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc79479&r=ino
  27. By: Lawson Cornelia; Sterzi Valerio (University of Turin)
    Abstract: This paper explores the characteristics of persistent academic inventors and how they are influenced by their personal attributes, PhD institution, and first invention. Using a novel dataset on 555 UK academic inventors, we find that the quality of the first invention is the best predictor for subsequent participation in the patenting process. We further find evidence for a positive training effect whereby researchers that were trained at universities that had already established commercialisation units have a higher propensity to patent persistently. In addition, researchers that gained first patenting experience in industry are able to benefit from stronger knowledge flows and receive more citations than their purely academic peers.
    Date: 2012–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uto:labeco:201201&r=ino
  28. By: Benoît Mulkay; Jacques Mairesse
    Abstract: This article presents an econometric analysis of the direct effects of the R&D tax credit (RTC) on private R&D in France and proposes an ex ante evaluation of the major reform implemented in 2008. We first estimate an error correction model of a dynamic R&D demand function on a large panel data of R&D doing firms, obtaining a preferred estimate of -0.4 for the long run elasticity of the user cost of R&D capital. We then perform a micro-simulation of the effects of the 2008 RTC reform that shows that the implicit long run budget multiplier would be about 0.7.
    JEL: H25 H32 O32
    Date: 2013–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19073&r=ino
  29. By: Daniel Nepelski (European Commission – JRC - IPTS); Giuditta De Prato (European Commission – JRC - IPTS)
    Abstract: We study drivers of international patent applications by non-residents and assess the importance of the PCT membership in their motivations. We construct bilateral measures of foreign patent applications for all countries active as both a source of patents and a destination of applications filed between 1970 and 2009. The data used originates from the EPO Patstat database. Applying a gravity model to explain the determinants of seeking patent protection in foreign markets, we find that there is a negative relationship between PCT membership and a country's attractiveness for foreign applicants. It is mainly the size of the market and a country's inventive capacity that attract foreign applicants to seek for patent protection in foreign countries.
    Keywords: patent harmonization, PCT, IPR, patenting strategies, international patenting, technology transfer
    JEL: F2 O30 O31 O57
    Date: 2012–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc79541&r=ino
  30. By: Montobbio Fabio; Sterzi Valerio (University of Turin)
    Abstract: This paper analyzes the determinants of different types of international technological collaborations among patents’ inventors between emerging and advanced countries. Technological collaborations generate knowledge flows between inventors through interpersonal and face to face contacts. We use US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) patent applications for a panel of eleven emerging economies and seven advanced countries (1990-2004) and a novel database that exploits information on companies’ country of origin. We estimate the impact of geographical distance and various economic and institutional variables using the Poisson pseudomaximum likelihood (PPML) and show that results vary according to the type of collaborations considered and to the country of origin (emerging vs. advanced) of the companies involved. Geographical distance affects international technological collaborations only when the applicant’s ownership is in the emerging country. Fixed effect estimates show that stronger IPRs positively affect international technological collaborations only when stemming from subsidiaries of multinational firms.
    Date: 2012–02
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uto:labeco:201208&r=ino
  31. By: Cantono, Simona (University of Turin)
    Abstract: This article applies the autocatalytic percolation model developed by Cantono and Solomon (2010) to the diffusion of environmental innovation. It contributes to the recent applied microeconomic diffusion literature by unveiling diffusion dynamics, by determining under what conditions is diffusion self-sustaining and by defining the optimal dynamic schedule of adoption subsidies which insures autonomous propagation. To this end a model which combines in a unique framework a learning curve model of dynamic cost reductions, a discrete choice model of heterogeneous technology adoption and a contagion model of technology diffusion is developed. It is shown that the system dynamics are discontinuous, path-dependent and irreversible. Propagation dynamics are uncovered: diffusion occurs along subsequent conquers of islands of potential adopters. Under certain circumstances diffusion is self-sustaining. In other occasions diffusion is confined to anegligible sub-set of the entire population of potential adopters. In the latter case a policy intervention can drive the system to overall propagation. This can be achieved by adoption subsidies which, in order to be effective and to avoid a waste of resources, must follow an optimal dynamic schedule. It is shown that the phasing-out stage is as important as the early stage of the intervention.
    Date: 2012–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uto:labeco:201222&r=ino
  32. By: Antonelli,Cristiano; Gehringer,Agnieszka (University of Turin)
    Abstract: This paper elaborates the microeconomic foundations of the demand pull hypothesis stressing the role of vertical knowledge externalities stemming from the complementarity between know ledge interactions and user-producer transactions. The increase in the demand can pull the rate of technological change in the system when it concerns the derived demand of innovative sectors. In this framework, technological change is an emergent property of any dynamic system, where external knowledge made available by each agent plays a key role in the introduction of innovations by each other agent. Demand pulls the introduction of innovations when and where it comes from innovative customers. Using input output tables that grasp user-producer interactions, the paper provides an empirical test of these hypotheses for 15 European countries in the years 1995-2007. The evidence confirms that the in crease of total factor productivity of the upstream supplying sectors is positively influenced by the sector-level derived demand, according to the rates of introduction of innovations and to the intensity of their user-producer interactions. The policy implications of the analysis enable to elaborate and implement the notion of a ‘competent’ public demand.
    Date: 2012–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uto:labeco:201214&r=ino
  33. By: DEHEZ, Pierre (Université catholique de Louvain, CORE, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium); POUKENS, SOPHIE (Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium)
    Abstract: We consider the problem of specifying Fair, Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory agreements faced by standard-setting organizations. Along with Layne-Farrar, Padilla and Schmalensee (2007), we model the problem as a cooperative game with transferable utility, allowing for patents to be weak in the sense that they have substitutes. Assuming that a value has been assigned to weak patents, we obtain a formula for the Shapley value that gives an insight into what FRAND agreements should look like.
    Keywords: patent licensing, Shapley value, core
    Date: 2013–05–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cor:louvco:2013012&r=ino
  34. By: Hottenrott, Hanna; Lawson, Cornelia (University of Turin)
    Abstract: Based on a sample of research units in science and engineering at German universities, this study reports survey evidence showing that research grants impact research content. Research units that receive funds from industry are more likely to source ideas from the private sector. The higher the share of industry funding on the units’ total budget, the more likely that large firms influenced the research agenda. Public research grants, on the other hand, are associated with a higher importance of conferences and scientific sources. What is more, the different sources of ideas impact scientific output. Research units that source research ideas from small and medium-sized firms (SMEs) patent more, but not more successful than others in terms of the impact of their inventions on future patents. If, on the other hand, research units source ideas from large firms we find them to publish less and with lower impact on future scientific work.
    Date: 2012–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uto:labeco:201215&r=ino
  35. By: Lissoni, Francesco; Fabio, Montobbio (University of Turin)
    Abstract: Authorship and inventorship contribute to the reputation of individual scientists and are distributed across several individuals, due to the importance of teamwork in both science and technology. For academic teams that both publish and patent their research results, we compare the social and legal norms that affect the negotiation over the distribution of authorship and inventorship. We use text-mining techniques to identify 680 "patent-publication pairs" (related sets of patents and publications), for a sample of Italian academic scientists. On average, the number of co-authors is larger than the number of co-inventors, especially in medical-related fields. First and last authors have a lower probability of being excluded from inventorship. However, the probability of exclusion also declines with seniority, as expected from social norms. Women have a significant higher probability to be excluded, other things being equal. Long-lasting doubts on the reliability of authorship as a tool for allocating scientific credit are reinforced, and can be extended to inventorship. Results for attribution rights in science, as we obtain here, raise questions and provide insights on other settings in which attribution rights are both relevant and distributed within teams.
    Date: 2012–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uto:labeco:201221&r=ino
  36. By: Peter Dawson
    Abstract: Courts require royalty rate calculations based on rigorous economic foundations. The licensing literature provides limited guidance for royalty rate determination, leaving appraisal report readers wanting a more tangible and objective lens through which to understand and judge the credibility of royalty rate analyses. This paper develops the standard, core model for calculating market royalty rates for intangible asset licenses where royalty rates are determined ex ante in the actual market, or ex post in a hypothetical market under a market value standard. The model forms a consistent basis for performing and evaluating licensing royalty appraisals. Not being distracted with the question of how to combine the input values when calculating a royalty rate, the court can focus on understanding and verifying an appraiser’s calculations of the input variable values.
    Keywords: royalty rate, licensing, intangible asset, intellectual property rights, technology, valuation, bargaining range, royalty base, Georgia Pacific factors
    JEL: D00 D40 D45 D46 D82 D86 K00 K34 L24 M20 O34
    Date: 2013–03
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uct:alumni:2013-03&r=ino
  37. By: Mario D. Tello (Departamento de Economía - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú)
    Abstract: Este trabajo resume la política en Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (CTI) en el Perú, particularmente en el sector de servicios. Dicha política no has sido prioritaria para los gobiernos de las últimas dos décadas. Adicionalmente, los indicadores CTI están entre los más bajos de América Latina (AL). El sistema nacional CTI (SINACYIT) es desarticulado y basado en programas que promueven actividades de innovación en los sectores primarios y manufacturados sin ninguna estrategia específica de innovación que la sustente. En el caso de servicios, la política fue orientada en proveer infraestructuras para las herramientas de tecnologías de información y comunicaciones (TIC) bajos los principios de acceso universal, asequibilidad, fomento de la competencia privada, y convergencia tecnológica y de servicios en concordancia con la evolución y desarrollo de las tecnologías de información y comunicación. Estos hechos conjuntamente con las magnitudes inadecuadas de los indicadores CTI sugieren la necesidad de replantear la estrategia de la política STI y de sus arreglos institucionales.
    Abstract: This paper summarizes the science, technology and innovation (STI) policy in Peru focusing in the services sector. Consistent with some other survey studies, STI policy in Peru has not been a priority for the different government administrations of the last two decades. Further, STI indicators are among the lowest ones of Latin American Countries (LAC). The national STI system (SINACYIT) has been built in a disarticulated way and STI policy was concentrated on some particular programs and funds oriented basically to foster firms’ innovation activities of primary and manufactured sectors without a specific and previously designed innovation strategy. In the case of services, policy was oriented in providing information and communication technology (ICT) infrastructure under the principles of universal access, affordability, fostering private competition, technological convergence in concordance with the evolution and development of ICT. These facts together with the inadequate figures of STI indicators suggest the need to rethink STI policy strategy and its institutional arrangement.
    Keywords: Innovación, productividad laboral, ciencia, tecnología e innovación.
    JEL: O14 O54
    Date: 2013
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pcp:pucwps:wp00353&r=ino

This nep-ino issue is ©2013 by Steffen Lippert. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.