nep-ino New Economics Papers
on Innovation
Issue of 2012‒05‒08
nine papers chosen by
Steffen Lippert
University of Otago, Dunedin

  1. Abuse of Dominance and Licensing of Intellectual Property By Rey, Patrick; Salant, David
  2. Abuse of Dominance and Licensing of Intellectual Property By Rey, Patrick; Salant, David
  3. Sunk costs, extensive R&D subsidies and permanent inducement effects By Pere Arqué-Castells; Pierre Mohnen
  4. Technological Leadership and Sectoral Employment Growth:A Spatial Econometric Analysis for U.S. Counties By Valerien O. Pede; Raymond J.G.M. Florax; Henri L.F. de Groot
  5. Determinants of Pharmaceutical Innovation: The Role of Technological Opportunities Revisited By Bastian Rake
  6. Entrepreneurship in Advanced and Developing Countries: A Microeconomic Perspective By Vivarelli, Marco
  7. Working Paper 04-12 - Le système d’innovation en Wallonie By Bernadette Biatour; Coraline Daubresse; Chantal Kegels
  8. L'innovation dans les firmes multinationales : une revue de la littérature By Lusine Arzumanyan
  9. La dynamique des innovations d'exploration et d'exploitation des PME à travers les alliances stratégiques. By Bouzid, Inès

  1. By: Rey, Patrick (TSE); Salant, David (TSE)
    Abstract: We examine the impact of the licensing policies of one or more upstream owners of essential intellectual property (IP hereafter) on the variety offered by a downstream industry, as well as on consumers and social welfare. When an upstream monopoly owner of essential IP increases the number of licenses, it enhances product variety, adding to consumer value, but it also intensifies downstream competition, and thus dissipates profits. As a result, the upstream IP monopoly may want to provide too many or too few licenses, relatively to what maximizes consumer surplus or social welfare. With multiple owners of essential IP, royalty stacking increases aggregate licensing fees and thus tends to limit the number of licensees, which can also reduce downstream prices for consumers. We characterize the conditions under which these reductions in downstream prices and variety is beneficial to consumers or society.
    Keywords: Intellectual property, licensing policy, vertical integration, patent pools.
    JEL: L4 L5 O3
    Date: 2012–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:tse:wpaper:25803&r=ino
  2. By: Rey, Patrick (TSE); Salant, David (TSE)
    Abstract: We examine the impact of the licensing policies of one or more upstream owners of essential intellectual property (IP hereafter) on the variety offered by a downstream industry, as well as on consumers and social welfare. When an upstream monopoly owner of essential IP increases the number of licenses, it enhances product variety, adding to consumer value, but it also intensifies downstream competition, and thus dissipates profits. As a result, the upstream IP monopoly may want to provide too many or too few licenses, relatively to what maximizes consumer surplus or social welfare. With multiple owners of essential IP, royalty stacking increases aggregate licensing fees and thus tends to limit the number of licensees, which can also reduce downstream prices for consumers. We characterize the conditions under which these reductions in downstream prices and variety is beneficial to consumers or society.
    Keywords: Intellectual property, licensing policy, vertical integration, patent pools.
    JEL: L4 L5 O3
    Date: 2012–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ide:wpaper:25793&r=ino
  3. By: Pere Arqué-Castells; Pierre Mohnen
    Abstract: We study whether there is scope for using subsidies to smooth out barriers to R&D performance and expand the share of R&D firms in Spain. We consider a dynamic model with sunk entry costs in which firms’ optimal participation strategy is defined in terms of two subsidy thresholds that characterise entry and continuation. We compute the subsidy thresholds from the estimates of a dynamic panel data type-2 tobit model for an unbalanced panel of about 2,000 Spanish manufacturing firms. The results suggest that “extensive” subsidies are a feasible and efficient tool for expanding the share of R&D firms. <P>Est-il possible à l’aide de subsides à la recherche d’augmenter, non pas l’intensité de la recherche dans les firmes qui en font déjà, mais le nombre de firmes qui font de la recherche? Tel est l’objet de cet article. Nous élaborons un modèle dynamique avec des coûts irrécupérables dans lequel il y a deux seuils de subsides, un au-delà duquel les firmes s’engagent à faire de la recherche et un autre au-delà duquel les firmes continuent à faire de la recherche. Nous estimons ces seuils à l’aide d’un modèle tobit type II dynamique et des données d’un panel non-cylindré de 2000 firmes manufacturières espagnoles. Les résultats suggèrent que les subsides à la recherche forment un moyen efficace d’amener plus de firmes à faire de la recherche.
    Keywords: R&D, persistence, subsidies, dynamic models, R&D, persistance, subventions, modèles dynamiques
    Date: 2012–04–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cir:cirwor:2012s-09&r=ino
  4. By: Valerien O. Pede (Social Sciences Div., International Rice Research Institute); Raymond J.G.M. Florax (Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN); Henri L.F. de Groot (USDA:Economic Research Service, Washington, DC)
    Abstract: This paper investigates the determinants of technological catch-up and examines at a refined level of spatial and sectoral aggregation to what extent geographical and/or technological proximity to the technology leader impact regional employment growth. Technological progress is endogenously determined and depends on specialization, competition and diversity. We also allow technological progress to depend on agglomeration economies in proximate regions, and model technological progress by means of a hierarchical process of catch-up to the technology leader. Results indicate that human capital plays a crucial role in promoting sectoral employment growth. The effect of technological distance varies, depending on which sector is considered. Technological distance to the leader shows a positive and significant effect on employment growth in the sectors Construction & Manufacturing, Information & Utilities, and Services. No effect of technological distance was found for Finance & Management, Transportation & Trade, and Natural Resources. The effect of geographical distance to the technology leader on employment growth also varies across sectors. A negative effect is observed for Construction & Manufacturing and Finance & Management, while the effect is positive for Natural Resources and Transportation & Trade, and statistically not different from zero for Information and Utilities and Services.
    Keywords: regional employment growth, technology leadership, space
    JEL: R11 R12 C21 O32 O47
    Date: 2011
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pae:wpaper:11-1&r=ino
  5. By: Bastian Rake (Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Graduate College "The Economics of Innovative Change")
    Abstract: Recent empirical contributions emphasize the importance of (potential) market size for the development of new pharmaceuticals. At the same time many scholars point out the importance of of scientific advances for the industry's R&D activities. Against this background I analyze the relationship between (potential) market size, technological opportunities, and the number of new pharmaceuticals in the United States. Technological opportunities are operationalized as growth rates of the relevant knowledge stock as proposed by Andersen (1999, 1998). I analyze a unique dataset by using an "entry stock" Poisson quasi-maximum likelihood estimator. The results reveal a rather robust and significantly positive response of the number of new pharmaceuticals, i.e., new molecular entities or new drug approvals, to market size and technological opportunities.
    Keywords: Determinants of Innovation, Pharmaceuticals, Demand, Technological Opportunities
    JEL: O31 J10 J20
    Date: 2012–05–03
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:jrp:jrpwrp:2012-018&r=ino
  6. By: Vivarelli, Marco (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore)
    Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to provide a contribution to the identification of the role of entrepreneurship in economic growth by mapping out: 1) alternative ways of looking at entrepreneurship, distinguishing 'creative destruction' from simple 'turbulence'; 2) the different microeconomic determinants of new firm formation, distinguishing 'progressive' from 'regressive' drivers; 3) the relationship between ex-ante characteristics (of the founder) and post-entry performance (of the new firm); and 4) the possible scope for an economic policy aimed at maximizing the impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. Where possible and appropriate, throughout the paper particular attention is devoted to the specific features characterizing entrepreneurship in developing countries.
    Keywords: entrepreneurship, new firm, innovation, development
    JEL: L26 O12
    Date: 2012–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp6513&r=ino
  7. By: Bernadette Biatour; Coraline Daubresse; Chantal Kegels
    Abstract: This working paper analyses the performances of the Walloon innovation system in 2010. It concentrates on the six dimensions of the innovation system: knowledge development, human resources, R&D valorisation, innovation absorption capacity, entrepreneurial skills and financing capacity. These pillars are assessed by comparing the Walloon performances with those of European countries and regions with a similar industrial heritage. The analysis underlines the good performances of the mobilisation of financial resources in favour of R&D activities but also a potential problem in terms of human resources available for these activities. Maintaining a sufficient flow of competence by new science graduates and engineers and by the implementation of lifelong learning remains the key challenge in the years to come.
    Keywords: Innovation, Regional economy, Assessment
    JEL: O31 O32 O38 R58
    Date: 2012–02–28
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:fpb:wpaper:1204&r=ino
  8. By: Lusine Arzumanyan (EA3713 - Centre de Recherche Magellan - Université de Lyon - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon III)
    Abstract: Cette communication a pour objectif d'examiner les études récentes à travers une revue de la littérature sur les processus d'innovation dans les firmes multinationales. Le but de cette revue est de fournir une feuille de route de ce domaine en mettant en avant divers aspects empiriques et théoriques qui ont été étudiés dans la littérature.
    Keywords: Processus d'innovation, firme multinationale, siège, filiale, coordination
    Date: 2011
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00690902&r=ino
  9. By: Bouzid, Inès
    Abstract: L’objectif de cette recherche est de comprendre le rôle que peuvent jouer les alliances complémentaires et additives d’une PME pour concilier les innovations d’exploration et les innovations d’exploitation. La compréhension du contexte de la conclusion des alliances par la PME et les liens qui peuvent exister entre les différentes natures des alliances et des innovations étudiées a été conduite selon deux approches. En effet, la recherche réunit les apports d’une approche exploratoire qualitative et ceux d’une étude confirmatoire quantitative. La recherche montre que la conduite des innovations d’exploration et d’exploitation au moyen des alliances stratégiques est influencée par un ensemble de facteurs contextuels, organisationnels et stratégiques. La phase exploratoire a permis de distinguer clairement les alliances de la PME avec l’industrie et celles avec le monde académique. La phase confirmatoire quant à elle a permis d’éclairer les spécificités des différentes alliances des PME en termes de ressources mobilisées, de choix des partenaires, d’objectifs stratégiques et d’innovations conduites. Cette recherche montre que la conciliation des innovations d’exploration et d’exploitation au sein d’une même PME, au moyen de la mise en oeuvre des alliances complémentaires et additives, s’opère avec différentes natures de partenaires.
    Abstract: The aim of this research is to understand the role played by the complementary and additive alliances of Small to Medium sized Enterprises (SMEs) in order to conciliate both explorative and exploitative innovation. The understanding of the context of the conclusion of SMEs alliances and the links which can exist between the various natures of the alliances and the studied innovations was led according to two approaches. In fact, the research brings together both the contributions of a qualitative exploratory approach with those of a quantitative confirmatory study. The research shows that the driving of both explorative and exploitative innovations by means of the strategic alliances is influenced by a set of contextual, organizational and strategic factors. The exploratory phase has allowed distinguishing clearly between the SMEs’s alliances with the industry and those with the academic word. In the other hand, the confirmatory phase has allowed to clarify the specificities of the various alliances of the SMEs in terms of mobilized resources, partner’s choice, strategic objectives and driven innovation. This research shows that the conciliation of explorative and exploitative innovation within the same SMEs, by means of the implementation of the complementary and additive alliances, takes place with various natures of partners.
    Keywords: Explorative innovation; Exploitative innovation; Complementary alliance; Additive alliance; Resources and competencies; SMEs; Innovation d’exploration; Innovation d’exploitation; Alliance complémentaire; Alliance additive; Ressources et compétences; PME;
    JEL: L14 C93 O31
    Date: 2011–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ner:dauphi:urn:hdl:123456789/9074&r=ino

This nep-ino issue is ©2012 by Steffen Lippert. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.