Abstract: |
What determines the enforcement of deregulation reform of business activities?
What are the outcomes of deregulation? We address these questions using an
episode of a drastic reform in Russia between 2001 and 2004 which liberalized
registration, licensing, and inspections. Based on the analysis of micro-level
panel data on regulatory burden, we find that: 1) On average, the reform
reduced the administrative costs of firms; but, the progress of reform had a
substantial geographical variation. 2) The enforcement of deregulation reform
was better in regions with a transparent government, low corruption, better
access of the public to independent media sources, a powerful industrial
lobby, and stronger fiscal autonomy. 3) Using the exogenous variation in
regulation generated by the interaction of reform and its institutional
determinants, we find a substantial positive effect of deregulation on net
entry and small business employment and no effect on pollution and public
health. The results support public choice theory of the nature of regulation
and are inconsistent with the predictions of public interest theory. |