Abstract: |
This paper considers effects of price regulation in retail payment systems by
applying the model of tele-communications competition by Laffont-Rey-Tirole
(1998). In our two-country model world there is one retail payment network
located in each country and markets are segmented à la Hotelling. We show that
the optimal price under price regulation is the weighted average of
pre-regulation domestic and cross-border prices where the degree of home-bias
in making payments serves as the weight. Furthermore, we find that the general
welfare effects of price regulation are ambiguous: gross social welfare is
higher un-der price discrimination than under price regulation in the special
case where costs of access to banking services (transportation costs) are
high. However, there also exist cases where prohibitively high transac-tion
costs make price discrimination to reduce total welfare. Finally, if
transportation costs are reduced sufficiently, segmentation of payment markets
is eliminated. Markets then become fully-served as in the original
Laffont-Rey-Tirole model, suggesting that price discrimination would be
beneficial for welfare. |