nep-ifn New Economics Papers
on International Finance
Issue of 2016‒07‒09
two papers chosen by
Vimal Balasubramaniam
University of Oxford

  1. What Determines the Composition of International Bank Flows? By Niepmann, Friederike; Kerl, Cornelia
  2. Changes in Prudential Policy Instruments ---- A New Cross-Country Database By Cerutti, Eugenio; Correa, Ricardo; Fiorentino, Elisabetta; Segalla, Esther

  1. By: Niepmann, Friederike; Kerl, Cornelia
    Abstract: This paper studies how frictions to foreign bank operations affect the sectoral composition of banks’ foreign positions, their funding sources and international bank flows. It presents a parsimonious model of banking across borders, which is matched to bank-level data and used to quantify cross-border frictions. The counterfactual analysis shows how higher barriers to foreign bank entry alter the composition of international bank flows and may reverse the direction of net interbank flows. It also highlights that interbank lending and lending to non-banking firms respond differently to changes in foreign and domestic conditions. Ultimately, the analysis suggests that policies that change cross-border banking frictions and, thereby, the composition of banks’ foreign activities affect how shocks are transmitted across borders.
    Keywords: Global banks ; Interbank market ; International bank flows ; Cross-border banking
    JEL: F21 F23 F30 G21
    Date: 2016–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:fip:fedgif:1170&r=ifn
  2. By: Cerutti, Eugenio; Correa, Ricardo; Fiorentino, Elisabetta; Segalla, Esther
    Abstract: This paper documents the features of a new database that focuses on changes in the intensity in the usage of several widely used prudential tools, taking into account both macro-prudential and microprudential objectives. The database coverage is broad, spanning 64 countries, and with quarterly data for the period 2000Q1 through 2014Q4. The five types of prudential instruments in the database are: capital buffers, interbank exposure limits, concentration limits, loan to value (LTV) ratio limits, and reserve requirements. A total of nine prudential tools are constructed since some useful further decompositions are presented, with capital buffers divided into four sub-indices: general capital requirements, real state credit specific capital buffers, consumer credit specific capital buffers, and other specific capital buffers; and with reserve requirements divided into two sub-indices: domestic currency capital requirements and foreign currency capital requirements. While general capital requirements have the most changes from the cross-country perspective, LTV ratio limits and reserve requirements have the largest number of tightening and loosening episodes. We also analyze the instruments’ usage in relation to the evolution of key variables such as credit, policy rates, and house prices, finding substantial differences in the patterns of loosening or tightening of instruments in relation to business and financial cycles.
    Keywords: Macroprudential policies ; Microprudential policies ; Financial cycles
    JEL: E43 E58 G18 G28
    Date: 2016–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:fip:fedgif:1169&r=ifn

This nep-ifn issue is ©2016 by Vimal Balasubramaniam. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.