nep-ict New Economics Papers
on Information and Communication Technologies
Issue of 2008‒06‒13
six papers chosen by
Walter Frisch
University Vienna

  1. Software Marketing on the Internet: the Use of Samples and Repositories By Alexia Gaudeul
  2. Corporate Financial Reporting on Internet: Global Developments and an Appraisal of Practices in Bangladesh By Md. Abid Hossain Khan, Ahmed Taneem Muzaffar and Abdul Kader Nazmul
  3. Heterodox Economics and Dissemination of Research through the Internet: the Experience of RePEc and NEP By Marco Novarese; Christian Zimmermann
  4. An approximation to the digital divide among Low Income People in Colombia, Mexico and Perú: two composite indexes By Luis Hernando Gutierrez; Luis Fernando Gamboa
  5. Enabling and Sustaining Collaborative Innovation By Blecker, Thorsten; Abdelkafi, Nizar; Raasch, Christina
  6. Culture, Creativity and Innovation in the Internet Age By Freeman, Alan

  1. By: Alexia Gaudeul (Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia)
    Abstract: This paper examines one of the most important marketing strategies by software producers on the Internet. That is whether to offer free samples and if so, whether to list the samples on shareware repositories. I show that firms with higher value products have a greater incentive to offer free samples but are more reluctant to do so if they are well known, and even when they do are less likely to be listed on shareware repositories. I then proceed to use four types of Probit-based models to corroborate the findings from the theoretical model.
    Keywords: Shareware; Software; Internet; Distribution; Intermediation; Directory; Repository; Advertising; Brand; Reputation; Asymmetric Information; Search; Sample.
    JEL: D42 D43 D82 D83 L13 L15 L81 L86
    Date: 2008–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ccp:wpaper:wp08-23&r=ict
  2. By: Md. Abid Hossain Khan, Ahmed Taneem Muzaffar and Abdul Kader Nazmul (Independent University, Bangladesh; East West University, Bangladesh; American International University-Bangladesh (AIUB))
    Abstract: The use of internet technology for corporate reporting is currently a well-established practice in many countries that have developed securities market. Investors find corporate web sites as a convenient way of collecting financial information of companies. Corporations also find the internet to be the most prompt and economical means of information dissemination. The practice of corporate reporting on the internet is relatively new in Bangladesh. However, the fast development of securities market in Bangladesh has caused expansion of this practice day by day. The paper investigates the emerging issues of online corporate financial reporting in the global context. It then makes an attempt to provide an appraisal of the current practice of corporate financial reporting on the internet by Bangladeshi companies and tries to provide recommendations in the light of global developments. The research reveals that although many of the issues relating to online financial reporting have been addressed by different standard setters worldwide, they have been overlooked in Bangladesh and some of these issues need particular attention for continued development and further guidance in this area.
    Date: 2008–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:aiu:abewps:71&r=ict
  3. By: Marco Novarese (Universita del Piemonte Orientale); Christian Zimmermann (University of Connecticut)
    Abstract: We study how the democratization of the diffusion of research through the Internet could have helped non traditional fields of research. The specific case we approach is Heterodox Economics as its pre-prints are disseminated through NEP, the email alert service of RePEc. Comparing heterodox and mainstream papers, we find that heterodox ones are quite systematically more downloaded, and particularly so when considering downloads per subscriber. We conclude that the Internet definitely helps heterodox research, also because other researcher get exposed to it. But there is still room for more participation by heterodox researchers.
    Keywords: NEP, RePEc, heterodox economics, diffusion of research
    JEL: B50 A14
    Date: 2008–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uct:uconnp:2008-17&r=ict
  4. By: Luis Hernando Gutierrez; Luis Fernando Gamboa
    Abstract: This study examines the determinants of information and communications technology (ICT) use and access of low-income people in three developing countries: Colombia, Mexico and Peru. We focus on cross-country differences and similarities in ICTs use across gender, age, education and income, using two composite indicators of ICT. The main similarity across the countries is that education is by far the single most important factor limiting the digitalization of low-income people. The impact of income was low although positive. There is not apparently a gender gap in Colombia and Mexico but one in Peru. Our findings also suggest that when using a composite indicator that only include the ‘advanced ICTs’, disadvantage people among the low-income people can be more constrained in the use and access of more advanced information and communications technologies. **** El estudio analiza los determinantes de uso y acceso a las tecnologías de información y comunicación en personas de bajos ingresos en pasases como Colombia, México y Perú. El punto central esta en analizar las diferencias entre países de acuerdo a diferentes variables socioeconómicas. Se encuentra que la variable que más explica el nivel de acceso digital es la escolaridad. De otro lado no se encuentra una brecha por género sino en Perú. Los resultados también indican que cuando solo se tienen en cuenta las tecnologías más ‘avanzadas’, las diferencias entre la población son más notorias.
    Date: 2008–06–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:col:000092:004710&r=ict
  5. By: Blecker, Thorsten; Abdelkafi, Nizar; Raasch, Christina
    Abstract: This paper extends the principles of open source software development to a non-industry-specific level by introducing the Open Source Innovation (OSI) model. OSI exhibits main differences to other related models and concepts such as the private-collective model, commons-based peer production, R&D networks and is therefore an innovation model in its own right. In order for OSI projects to be successful, numerous factors need to be fulfilled. We make the distinction between four categories of factors: economic, technical, legal, and social. In each category, we differentiate between enabling and sustaining factors. The enabling factors must be met at the beginning of the project, whereas the sustaining factors must be satisfied as the project progresses.
    Keywords: OSI; open source innovation; R&D
    JEL: O32 L17 O3 O31
    Date: 2008
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:8964&r=ict
  6. By: Freeman, Alan
    Abstract: bstract This unpublished paper was submitted to the May 22-23 conference on IPR at Birkbeck College, London. It analyses the distinct economic roles of culture, creation, and innovation in the Creative Industries by assessing the fitness for purpose of their statistical definitions. On this basis it proposes a method for studying the relation between creative labour and innovation. Lax usage has made the term ‘Creative Industries’ a synonym for three distinct things: creativity, culture and intellectual alienability. I use the term Cultural and Creative Sector (CCS). My aim is to distinguish Creative Labour, of which the sector is a specialist user, from Cultural Outputs, which the sector produces. These are found combined in the CCS in an advanced form, but they also exist separately outside it. In order to understand their wider economic impact – in particular, their relation to innovation and Intellectual Property – it is necessary to distinguish them. I begin from the empirical reality of the Creative Industries as currently defined which, I argue, establishes it as an ‘industrial sector’, in the economically meaningful sense that it is a specialised branch of the division of labour. Its definition, however, has yet to be aligned with this reality. This sector’s specialism is that it employs creative labour to produce cultural products. Its emergence is the outcome of two processes: a separation of mechanical from creative labour, which we inherit from the age of machines, and a revolution in service sector productivity, arising from the age of the internet. Creative labour is a general economic resource, employed both inside and outside the CCS. The CCS is the starting point of an adequate definition, because in it, creative labour is found in its most advanced and specialised form, and because in it, this kind of labour has applied to maximum effect the new service technologies which have emerged with the internet age. However, in order properly to assess its wider impact, creative labour has to be defined independent of the assumption that it only produces cultural products. This paper proposes such a definition. It outlines, on the basis of this definition, how the economic contribution of creative labour to service sector growth might be assessed.
    Keywords: cultural economics; creative industries; innovation; internet
    JEL: Z1 O3 J2
    Date: 2008–05–23
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:9007&r=ict

This nep-ict issue is ©2008 by Walter Frisch. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.