Abstract: |
Many authors have claimed that New Public Management (NPM) has entailed a
paradigm shift away from traditional public administration. This claim is
literally based on the formulations of Thomas Kuhn: NPM is said to change the
assumptions of the traditional paradigm and thereby causing a scientific
revolution. This article reviews this claim, arguing that some criteria of a
Kuhnsian revolution are not entirely met. For instance, the contradictions in
NPM show that the pre-paradigmatic quarrel is not finished, the frameworks may
also be commensurable and NPM’s problem-solving capacity is questionable. We
argue that NPM is not a paradigm and that both supporters and opponents of the
paradigm shift use the term as a rhetorical tactic to create a caricatural
polemic. |