By: |
Alice Soldà (Emlyon business school, CNRS, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Université Jean-Monnet Saint-Etienne, GATE, 69007, Lyon, France);
Marie Claire Villeval (CNRS, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Université Jean-Monnet Saint-Etienne, emlyon business school, GATE, 69007, Lyon, France; IZA, Bonn, Germany) |
Abstract: |
We investigated whether individuals use narratives about the role of luck to
influence decision-makers’ interpretation of noisy performance signals in a
tournament setting. In an experiment, pairs of workers were either rewarded
for accurately estimating their relative performance (Control treatment),
persuading a manager they outperformed their competitor (Strategic treatment),
or both (Trade-Off treatment). Results show that workers were most likely to
adopt self-serving narratives attributing signals of lower performance to bad
luck in the Strategic treatment. This tendency was reduced in the Trade-Off
treatment where accuracy incentives were introduced. While self-serving
narratives influenced managers’ decisions regarding the allocation of the
winner’s prize, they did not change workers’ beliefs, suggesting that the
narratives did not deceive them. |
Keywords: |
Narratives, persuasion, beliefs, tournament, performance evaluation, online experiment |
JEL: |
C91 D83 J33 M52 |
Date: |
2025 |
URL: |
https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:gat:wpaper:2505 |