nep-hap New Economics Papers
on Economics of Happiness
Issue of 2025–11–24
two papers chosen by
Viviana Di Giovinazzo, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca


  1. Election and Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election By Kim, Dongyoung; Kim, Young-Il; Rho, Haedong
  2. Economics, Wellbeing, and Mental Health: A Regional Analysis of Socioeconomic Impacts and Policy Implications By Mercedes Gumbau; Joaquin Maudos

  1. By: Kim, Dongyoung; Kim, Young-Il; Rho, Haedong
    Abstract: This paper uses daily Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data to estimate the causal effect of the 2024 U.S. presidential election, a highly competitive race whose outcome resolved lingering uncertainty on election day, on mental-health and life-satisfaction outcomes through a regression discontinuity design. Following the resolution of electoral uncertainty on election day, we find a sharp and persistent post-election decline in subjective well-being, concentrated among female, non-White, urban, and more-educated respondents. These findings reveal an expected-outcome shock, showing that political polarization itself, not electoral surprise, can act as a chronic psychological stressor.
    Keywords: Election, Subjective Well-Being, Mental Health, Life Satisfaction
    JEL: H00 I31
    Date: 2025–10–29
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:126661
  2. By: Mercedes Gumbau (University of Valencia); Joaquin Maudos (University of Valencia)
    Abstract: Increasing awareness of the influence of socioeconomic conditions on mental health has brought this issue to the forefront of policy and research agendas?not only within the healthcare sector, but also among economists, policymakers, and fiscal authorities seeking robust economic evidence to guide decision-making. Mental ill health imposes a substantial economic burden as it leads to reduced productivity and greater demand for healthcare services. At the same time, individuals facing economic hardship are more vulnerable to mental health problems due to heightened exposure to adverse conditions such as social exclusion, limited access to protective resources like education, or through complex feedback loops involving poverty, the cost of treatment, and employment instability. Following these hypotheses, understanding the determinants of mental illness from the economic point of view is essential for improving public health, enhancing quality of life, and informing policies that promote population well-being. Emphasis should be placed on the need for regional strategies aimed at the prevention and management of mental disorders, particularly given the rising number of cases. This growing prevalence highlights that mental health conditions should no longer be viewed solely as individual issues, but as broader social challenges requiring collective action. According to the results of panel data estimations the paper states that regions with better valued health institutions and higher health endowments have a lower risk and a lower burden of disease.
    Keywords: mental disorders, inequality and deprivation, early detection, regional strategies
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:sek:iacpro:15516769

This nep-hap issue is ©2025 by Viviana Di Giovinazzo. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.