nep-hap New Economics Papers
on Economics of Happiness
Issue of 2023‒04‒17
two papers chosen by

  1. The Long-Term Impact of Paid Parental Leave on Maternal Health and Subjective Well-Being By Katharina Heisig
  2. Calling and the good life: a meta-analysis and theoretical extension By Dobrow, Shoshana R.; Weisman, Hannah; Heller, Daniel; Tosti-Kharas, Jennifer

  1. By: Katharina Heisig
    Abstract: This paper studies the long-term impact of a paid parental leave reform in former East Germany in 1986 on maternal physical and mental health and subjective well-being. The reform extended paid leave for first-time mothers by six months to a maximum of twelve months. I use representative survey data from the German Socio-Economic Panel and a difference-in-differences design in a quasi-experimental setting. Results show that the effects of the reform were negligible on maternal long-term physical and mental health and subjective well-being. There is weak, but not robust, evidence for increased satisfaction with household activities, income, and work.
    Keywords: social policy, parental leave, mental health, physical health, subjective well-being
    JEL: I12 J13 J16
    Date: 2023
  2. By: Dobrow, Shoshana R.; Weisman, Hannah; Heller, Daniel; Tosti-Kharas, Jennifer
    Abstract: While a positive view of calling has been ubiquitous since its introduction into the literature over two decades ago, research remains unsettled about the extent to which it contributes to various aspects of the good life: an optimal way of living well via worthwhile endeavors. Further, scholars have identified two conceptual types of calling, marked by internal versus external foci; yet their differential impact on outcomes indicative of the good life, such as eudaimonic and hedonic well-being (characterized by the experience of purpose and meaning versus pleasure and happiness, respectively), is unknown. Through a meta-analysis of 201 studies, we provide the first systematic review focused on these two fundamental theoretical issues in the calling literature: how strongly related callings are to outcomes in the domains of work and life and which type of calling (internally or externally focused) more strongly predicts these outcomes, if either. We find that callings more strongly relate to outcomes indicative of the good life than recently argued. We further find that callings are more strongly linked to work than to life outcomes and to eudaimonic than to hedonic outcomes. The two types of calling converge in being associated with many similar outcomes, but they show some divergence: internally focused callings are more positively related to hedonic outcomes and less positively related to eudaimonic outcomes, relative to externally focused callings. This finding supports a view of callings as hierarchically structured, with a higher-order calling factor composed of two correlated yet distinct lower-order calling types. Integrating our meta-analytic findings with relevant literatures, we propose a theoretical model that addresses psychological and social need fulfillment through which different types of callings contribute to the good life.
    Keywords: calling; meta-analysis; meaning of work; work orientation; the good life; career; well-being; Sage deal
    JEL: J50
    Date: 2023–03–05

General information on the NEP project can be found at For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.