nep-hap New Economics Papers
on Economics of Happiness
Issue of 2018‒02‒19
three papers chosen by



  1. What Do Workplace Wellness Programs Do? Evidence from the Illinois Workplace Wellness Study By Damon Jones; David Molitor; Julian Reif
  2. Unhappiness and Pain in Modern America: A Review Essay, and Further Evidence, on Carol Graham’s Happiness for All? By Blanchflower, David G.; Oswald, Andrew J
  3. Unfairness at Work: Well-Being and Quits By D'Ambrosio, Conchita; Clark, Andrew E.; Barazzetta, Marta

  1. By: Damon Jones; David Molitor; Julian Reif
    Abstract: Workplace wellness programs cover over 50 million workers and are intended to reduce medical spending, increase productivity, and improve well-being. Yet, limited evidence exists to support these claims. We designed and implemented a comprehensive workplace wellness program for a large employer with over 12,000 employees, and randomly assigned program eligibility and financial incentives at the individual level. Over 56 percent of eligible (treatment group) employees participated in the program. We find strong patterns of selection: during the year prior to the intervention, program participants had lower medical expenditures and healthier behaviors than non-participants. However, we do not find significant causal effects of treatment on total medical expenditures, health behaviors, employee productivity, or self-reported health status in the first year. Our 95% confidence intervals rule out 78 percent of previous estimates on medical spending and absenteeism. Our selection results suggest these programs may act as a screening mechanism: even in the absence of any direct savings, differential recruitment or retention of lower-cost participants could result in net savings for employers.
    JEL: I1 J3 M5
    Date: 2018–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:24229&r=hap
  2. By: Blanchflower, David G. (Dartmouth College, Stirling, NBER, Bloomberg and IZA); Oswald, Andrew J (University of Warwick, CAGE, and IZA)
    Abstract: In Happiness for All?, Carol Graham raises disquieting ideas about today’s United States. The challenge she puts forward is an important one. Here we review the intellectual case and offer additional evidence. We conclude broadly on the author’s side. Strikingly, Americans appear to be in greater pain than citizens of other countries, and most subgroups of citizens have downwardly trended happiness levels. There is, however, one bright side to an otherwise dark story. The happiness of black Americans has risen strongly since the 1970s. It is now almost equal to that of white Americans.
    Keywords: Happiness ; well-being ; GHQ ; mental-health ; depression ; life-course
    JEL: I3 I31
    Date: 2018
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:wrk:warwec:1153&r=hap
  3. By: D'Ambrosio, Conchita; Clark, Andrew E.; Barazzetta, Marta
    Abstract: We here consider the effect of the level of income that individuals consider to be fair for the job they do, which we take as measure of comparison income, on both subjective well-being and objective future job quitting. In six waves of German Socio-Economic Panel data, the extent to which own labour income is perceived to be unfair is significantly negatively correlated with subjective well-being, both in terms of cognitive evaluations (life and job satisfaction) and affect (the frequency of feeling happy, sad and angry). Perceived unfairness also translates into objective labour-market behaviour, with current unfair income predicting future job quits.
    Keywords: Fair income, subjective well-being, quits, SOEP
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cpm:docweb:1802&r=hap

General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.