nep-hap New Economics Papers
on Economics of Happiness
Issue of 2017‒11‒05
one paper chosen by
Viviana Di Giovinazzo
Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca

  1. Embedding as a Pitfall for Survey-Based Welfare Indicators: Evidence from an Experiment By Clemens Hetschko; Louisa von Reumont; Ronnie Schöb

  1. By: Clemens Hetschko; Louisa von Reumont; Ronnie Schöb
    Abstract: How can we assess the welfare of a society, its evolution over time and predict its change due to particular policy interventions? One way is to use survey-based welfare indicators such as the OECD Better Life Index. It invites people to weight a variety of quality of life indicators according to their individual preferences. 11 broad dimensions aggregate these indicators. Our experiment shows that people do not provide consistent ratings across differently labelled dimensions that embed the same indicators. They also do not adjust the rating of equally named dimensions changing sets of indicators. These results show that survey-based measures might suffer from strong embedding effects and, as a result, may fail to measure citizens’ true preferences for the indicators.
    Keywords: beyond GDP, welfare measurement, survey-based welfare indicators, OECD Better Life Index, embedding effect
    JEL: B41 C43 C83 I31
    Date: 2017
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ces:ceswps:_6419&r=hap

This nep-hap issue is ©2017 by Viviana Di Giovinazzo. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.