New Economics Papers
on Economics of Happiness
Issue of 2014‒03‒15
five papers chosen by



  1. Human well-being and in-work benefits: A randomized controlled trial By Dorsett, Richard; Oswald, Andrew J.
  2. Economic Growth Evens-Out Happiness: Evidence from Six Surveys By Andrew E. Clark; Sarah Flèche; Claudia Senik
  3. Adaptation to Poverty in Long-Run Panel Data By Andrew E. Clark; Conchita D´Ambrosio; Simone Ghislandi
  4. The Magic of the New: How Job Changes Affect Job Satisfaction By Adrian Chadi; Clemens Hetschko
  5. The Sad Truth About Happiness Scales By Timothy N. Bond; Kevin Lang

  1. By: Dorsett, Richard (National Institute of Economic and Social Research); Oswald, Andrew J. (University of Warwick)
    Abstract: Many politicians believe they can intervene in the economy to improve people’s lives. But can they? In a social experiment carried out in the United Kingdom, extensive in-work support was randomly assigned among 16,000 disadvantaged people. We follow a sub-sample of 3,500 single parents for 5 ensuing years. The results reveal a remarkable, and troubling, finding. Long after eligibility had ceased, the treated individuals had substantially lower psychological well-being, worried more about money, and were increasingly prone to debt. Thus helping people apparently hurt them. We discuss a behavioral framework consistent with our findings and reflect on implications for policy.
    Keywords: Well-Being
    Date: 2014
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cge:warwcg:182&r=hap
  2. By: Andrew E. Clark; Sarah Flèche; Claudia Senik
    Abstract: In spite of the great U-turn that saw income inequality rise in Western countries in the 1980s, happiness inequality has dropped in countries that have experienced income growth (but not in those that did not). Modern growth has reduced the share of both the “very unhappy” and the “perfectly happy”. The extension of public amenities has certainly contributed to this greater happiness homogeneity. This new stylized fact comes as an addition to the Easterlin paradox, offering a somewhat brighter perspective for developing countries.
    Keywords: Happiness, inequality, economic growth, development, Easterlin paradox
    JEL: D31 D6 I3 O15
    Date: 2014
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:diw:diwsop:diw_sp633&r=hap
  3. By: Andrew E. Clark; Conchita D´Ambrosio; Simone Ghislandi
    Abstract: We consider the link between poverty and subjective well-being, and focus in particular on potential adaptation to poverty. We use panel data on almost 45,800 individuals living in Germany from 1992 to 2011 to show first that life satisfaction falls with both the incidence and intensity of contemporaneous poverty. We then reveal that there is little evidence of adaptation within a poverty spell: poverty starts bad and stays bad in terms of subjective well-being. We cannot identify any causes of poverty entry which are unambiguously associated with adaptation to poverty.
    Keywords: Income, poverty, subjective well-being, adaptation, SOEP
    JEL: I31 D60
    Date: 2014
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:diw:diwsop:diw_sp634&r=hap
  4. By: Adrian Chadi (Institute for Labour Law and Industrial Relations in the EU, University of Trier); Clemens Hetschko (School of Business and Economics, Freie Universitaet Berlin)
    Abstract: We investigate a crucial event for job satisfaction: changing the workplace. For representative German panel data, we show that the reason why the previous employment ended is strongly linked to the satisfaction with the new job. When workers initiate a change of employer, they experience relatively high job satisfaction, though only in the short-term. To test causality, we exploit plant closure as exogenous trigger of job switching and find no causal effect of job changes on job satisfaction. Our findings concern research on workers' well-being as well as labor market and human resource policies.
    Keywords: job satisfaction, job changes, new job, honeymoon-hangover effect, plant closure
    JEL: I31 J28 J63 M50
    Date: 2014–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iaa:dpaper:201405&r=hap
  5. By: Timothy N. Bond; Kevin Lang
    Abstract: We show that, without strong auxiliary assumptions, it is impossible to rank groups by average happiness using survey data with a few potential responses. The categories represent intervals along some continuous distribution. The implied CDFs of these distributions will (almost) always cross when estimated using large samples. Therefore some monotonic transformation of the utility function will reverse the ranking. We provide several examples and a formal proof. Whether Moving-to-Opportunity increases happiness, men have become happier relative to women, and an Easterlin paradox exists depends on whether happiness is distributed normally or log-normally. We discuss restrictions that may permit such comparisons.
    JEL: D6 I3 N3
    Date: 2014–03
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19950&r=hap

General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.