New Economics Papers
on Economics of Happiness
Issue of 2012‒11‒17
two papers chosen by



  1. The Impact of the German Child Benefit on Child Well-Being By Raschke, Christian
  2. Some Key Differences between a Happy Life and a Meaningful Life By Baumeister, Roy F.; Vohs, Kathleen D.; Aaker, Jennifer L.; Garbinsky, Emily N.

  1. By: Raschke, Christian (Louisiana State University)
    Abstract: The German Child Benefit ("Kindergeld") is paid to legal guardians of children as a cash benefit. This study employs exogenous variations in the amount of child benefit received by households to investigate the extent to which these various changes have translated into an improvement in the circumstances of children related to their well-being. I use the German Socio-Economic Panel to estimate the impact of a given change in the child benefit on food expenditures of households, the probability of owning a home, the size of the home, as well as the probability of parents’ smoking, alcohol consumption, and parents’ social activities such as traveling, visiting movie theaters, going to pop concerts, attending classical music concerts or other cultural events. Households primarily increase per capita food expenditures in response to increases in child benefit, and they also improve housing conditions. I do not find a significant effect of child benefit on parents’ smoking or drinking, but parents of older children use the child benefit to pay for their social and personal entertainment activities.
    Keywords: child benefit, fungibility of income, child well-being
    JEL: I38 D12 H31
    Date: 2012–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp6980&r=hap
  2. By: Baumeister, Roy F. (FL State University); Vohs, Kathleen D. (University of MN); Aaker, Jennifer L. (Stanford University); Garbinsky, Emily N. (Stanford University)
    Abstract: Being happy and finding life meaningful overlap, but there are important differences. A large survey revealed multiple differing predictors of happiness (controlling for meaning) and meaningfulness (controlling for happiness). Satisfying one's needs and wants increased happiness but was largely irrelevant to meaningfulness. Happiness was largely present-oriented, whereas meaningfulness involves integrating past, present, and future. For example, thinking about future and past was associated with high meaningfulness but low happiness. Happiness was linked to being a taker rather than a giver, whereas meaningfulness went with being a giver rather than a taker. Higher levels of worry, stress, and anxiety were linked to higher meaningfulness but lower happiness. Concerns with personal identity and expressing the self-contributed to meaning but not happiness. We offer brief composite sketches of the unhappy but meaningful life and of the happy but meaningless life.
    Date: 2012–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ecl:stabus:2119&r=hap

General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.