New Economics Papers
on Economics of Happiness
Issue of 2012‒09‒16
three papers chosen by



  1. Heterogeneity in the Relationship between Happiness and Age: Evidence from the German Socio-Economic Panel By Gregori Baetschmann
  2. Working Time Preferences, Hours Mismatch and Well-Being of Couples: Are There Spillovers? By Christoph Wunder; Guido Heineck
  3. On the Measurement of Success and Satisfaction By René van den Brink; Frank Steffen

  1. By: Gregori Baetschmann
    Abstract: This paper studies the evolution of life satisfaction over the life course in Germany. It clarifies the causal interpretation of the econometric model by discussing the choice of control variables and the underidentification between age, cohort and time effects. The empirical part analyzes the distribution of life satisfaction over the life course at the aggregated, subgroup and individual level. To the findings: On average, life satisfaction is mildly decreasing up to age fifty-five followed by a hump shape with a maximum at seventy. The analysis at the lower levels suggests that people differ in their life satisfaction trends, whereas the hump shape after age fity-five is robust. No important differences between men and women are found. In contrast, education groups differ in their trends: highly educated people become happier over the life cycle, where life satisfaction decreases for less educated people.
    Keywords: Aging, life satisfaction, well-being, happiness methodology
    JEL: C23 I31 D91
    Date: 2012
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:diw:diwsop:diw_sp472&r=hap
  2. By: Christoph Wunder; Guido Heineck
    Abstract: We analyze how well-being is related to working time preferences and hours mismatch. Selfreported measures of life satisfaction are used as an empirical approximation of true wellbeing. Our results indicate that well-being is generally lower among workers with working time mismatch. Particularly underemployment is detrimental for well-being. We further provide first evidence on spillovers from the partner’s working time mismatch. However, the spillover becomes insignificant once we control for the partner’s well-being. This suggests that well-being is contagious, and the spillover is due to interdependent utilities. Females experience the highest well-being when their partner is working full-time hours. Male wellbeing is unaffected over a wide interval of the partner’s working hours.
    Keywords: Subjective well-being, life satisfaction, working time preferences, working time mismatch, spillovers, utility interdependence
    JEL: I31 J21 J22
    Date: 2012
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:diw:diwsop:diw_sp471&r=hap
  3. By: René van den Brink (VU University Amsterdam); Frank Steffen (The University of Liverpool Management School)
    Abstract: The main purpose of the present paper is to disentangle the mix-up of the notions of success and satisfaction which is prevailing in the voting power literature. We demonstrate that both notions are conceptually distinct, and discuss their relationship and measurement. We show that satisfaction contains success as one component, and that both coincide under the canonical set-up of a simultaneous decision-making mechanism as it is predominant in the voting power literature. However, we provide two examples of sequential decision-making mechanisms in order to illustrate the difference between success and satisfaction. In the context of the discussion of both notions we also address their relationship to different types of luck.
    Keywords: success; satisfaction; luck; power
    JEL: C79 D02 D71
    Date: 2012–03–27
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dgr:uvatin:20120030&r=hap

General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.