nep-ger New Economics Papers
on German Papers
Issue of 2021‒09‒27
five papers chosen by
Roberto Cruccolini
Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München

  1. Politikmüdigkeit nach Glarner Gemeindefusion By Bruno S. Frey; Anthony Gullo; Andre Briviba
  2. Strukturelle Veränderungen und Unternehmensanpassungen in der strategischen Managementforschung — Eine literaturbasierte Herleitung eines forschungsleitenden Begriffsverständnisses der immobilienwirtschaftlichen Transformation By Wagner, Benjamin
  3. Das Targeting von „Lifestyle“-Bedingungen. Welche Rechtfertigungen für die Behandlung? By Philippe Batifoulier; Louise Braddock; Victor Duchesne; Ariane Ghirardello; John Latsis
  4. DySiMo Dokumentation: Version 1.0 By Johannes Geyer; Salmai Qari; Hermann Buslei; Peter Haan
  5. Sollen CEOs rotieren? By Bruno S. Frey und Reiner Eichenberger

  1. By: Bruno S. Frey; Anthony Gullo; Andre Briviba
    Abstract: Die starke Reduktion der Gemeinden im Kanton Glarus, die 2006 an der Landsgemeinde beschlossen wurde, hat nur geringfügige finanzielle Auswirkungen gebracht. Hingegen ist die Stimmbeteiligung – ein wichtiger Indikator für die Beziehung der Bevölkerung zum demokratischen politischen Prozess – gefallen, gerade auch im Vergleich zu den umliegenden Kantonen. Diese bedauerliche Entwicklung des Bezugs der Bürgerinnen und Bürger zur Schweizer Demokratie sollte unbedingt im Auge behalten werden.
    Date: 2021–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cra:wpaper:2021-35&r=
  2. By: Wagner, Benjamin
    Date: 2021–09–17
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dar:wpaper:128564&r=
  3. By: Philippe Batifoulier (CEPN - Centre d'Economie de l'Université Paris Nord - LABEX ICCA - UP13 - Université Paris 13 - Université Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris 3 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UP - Université de Paris - Université Sorbonne Paris Nord - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Université Sorbonne Paris Nord); Louise Braddock; Victor Duchesne (CEPN - Centre d'Economie de l'Université Paris Nord - LABEX ICCA - UP13 - Université Paris 13 - Université Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris 3 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UP - Université de Paris - Université Sorbonne Paris Nord - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Université Sorbonne Paris Nord); Ariane Ghirardello (CEPN - Centre d'Economie de l'Université Paris Nord - LABEX ICCA - UP13 - Université Paris 13 - Université Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris 3 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UP - Université de Paris - Université Sorbonne Paris Nord - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Université Sorbonne Paris Nord); John Latsis
    Abstract: Patients suffering from "lifestyle" conditions are most often viewed as responsible for their illness, and so not considered to be a priority for healthcare resources. Instead, their treatment is financed on instrumental grounds: it is better to treat the condition now than to incur higher costs later of not doing so. An alternative register of justification at work in public healthcare policies is not motivated by instrumental considerations. Instead, it seeks to articulate an ethical case for prioritizing lifestyle conditions. Within this framework, we draw on the notion of vital need within the tradition of humanistic philosophy to argue that solidarity justifies the treatment of such conditions, exemplified here by obesity. We use the theoretical framework of economics of convention to present these two registers of justification at work in public healthcare policies. The importance of humanistic criticism prevents instrumental logic from being completely dominant.
    Keywords: health behavior,health care,health policy,legitimation,public health,self-responsibility
    Date: 2021
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03345323&r=
  4. By: Johannes Geyer; Salmai Qari; Hermann Buslei; Peter Haan
    Date: 2021
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:diw:diwddc:dd101&r=
  5. By: Bruno S. Frey und Reiner Eichenberger
    Abstract: The institution of a single CEO (Chief Executive Offi- cer) has significant weaknesses. The CEO's interests diverge from those of the owners and their representants as well as other top managers. Assigning so much power to a single person is risky. Changing a CEO incurs high costs. However, the traditional alter- native, a top management team working collectively, also has serious drawbacks. A new governance institution – a team of rotating chief executive officers – combines the advan- tages of the two traditional models without being fraught with their disadvantages.
    Keywords: Governance; CEO; board of directors; supervisory board; management team; rotation
    Date: 2021–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cra:wpaper:2021-34&r=

This nep-ger issue is ©2021 by Roberto Cruccolini. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.