By: |
Thomas Breda (PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS Paris - École normale supérieure - Paris - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, PSE - Paris School of Economics);
Julien Grenet (PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS Paris - École normale supérieure - Paris - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, PSE - Paris School of Economics);
Marion Monnet (PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS Paris - École normale supérieure - Paris - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, PSE - Paris School of Economics);
Clémentine Van Effenterre (Harvard Kennedy School - Harvard Kennedy School) |
Abstract: |
This paper reports the results of a large scale randomized experiment that was
de- signed to assess whether a short in-class intervention by an external
female role model can influence students’ attitudes towards science and
contribute to a significant change in their choice of field of study. The
intervention consists in a one hour, one off visit of a high school classroom
by a volunteer female scientist. It is targeted to change students’
perceptions and attitudes towards scientific careers and the role of women in
science, with the aim of ultimately reducing the gender gap in scientific
studies. Using a random as- signment of the interventions to 10th and 12th
grade classrooms during normal teaching hours, we find that exposure to female
role models significantly reduces the prevalence of stereotypes associated
with jobs in science, for both female and male students. While we find no
significant effect of the classroom interventions on 10th grade students’
choice of high school track the following year, our results show a positive
and significant impact of the intervention on the probability of applying and
of being admitted to a selective science major in college among 12th grade
students. This effect is essentially driven by high-achieving students and is
larger for girls in relative terms. After the intervention, their probability
to be enrolled in selective science programs after graduating from high school
increases by 30 percent with respect to the baseline mean. |
Keywords: |
Role models,gender,Science,Stereotypes,Track choice |
Date: |
2018–02 |
URL: |
http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:psewpa:halshs-01713068&r=gen |