nep-gen New Economics Papers
on Gender
Issue of 2018‒01‒01
six papers chosen by
Jan Sauermann
Stockholms universitet

  1. Do Boys Benefit from Male Teachers in Elementary School? Evidence from Administrative Panel Data By Puhani, Patrick A.
  2. Safe options induce gender differences in risk attitudes By Crosetto, P.; Filippin, A.
  3. Intergenerational Effects of Improving Women's Property Rights: Evidence from India By Shreyasee Das; Nayana Bose
  4. The Parental Gender Earnings Gap in the United States By YoonKyung Chung; Barbara Downs; Danielle H. Sandler; Robert Sienkiewicz
  5. Education effects on days hospitalized and days out of work by gender: Evidence from Turkey By Tansel, Aysit; Keskin, Halil Ibrahim
  6. Hiring discrimination against women: distinguishing taste based discrimination from statistical discrimination By Emmanuel Duguet; Loïc du Parquet; Pascale Petit

  1. By: Puhani, Patrick A.
    Abstract: With girls having overtaken boys in many education indicators, the “feminization” of elementary school teaching is causing debates about disadvantages for male students. Using administrative panel data on the universe of students, teachers and schools for a German state, I exploit within school and within teacher variation to determine teacher characteristics’ effects on students’ tracking outcomes. Germany tracks students at age 10 into more or less academic school types. I find hardly any effects of teacher’s gender, age, pay level, qualifications, or working hours on boys’ or girls’ school track recommendations or school choice. Even when following students into middle school, no effects of elementary-school teacher gender on school type change or grade repetition can be detected.
    Keywords: Education, gender, identification, fixed effects, teacher quality
    JEL: I21 J45 J71 J78
    Date: 2017–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:usg:econwp:2017:20&r=gen
  2. By: Crosetto, P.; Filippin, A.
    Abstract: Gender differences in risk attitudes are frequently observed, although recent literature has shown that they are context dependent rather than ubiquitous. In this paper we try to rationalize the heterogeneity of results investigating experimentally whether the presence of a safe option among the set of alternatives explains why females are more risk averse than males. We manipulate three widely used risk elicitation methods finding that the availability of a safe option causally affects risk attitudes. The presence of a riskless alternative does not entirely explain the gender gap but it has a significant effect in triggering or magnifying (when already present) such differences. Despite the pronounced instability that usually characterizes the measurement of risk preferences, we show, estimating a structural model, that the effect of a safe option is remarkably stable accross tasks. This paper constitutes the first successful attempt to shed light on the determinants of gender differences in risk attitudes.
    Keywords: GENDER DIFFERENCES;RISK ATTITUDES;EXPERIMENT;SAFE OPTIONS
    JEL: C81 C91 D81
    Date: 2017
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:gbl:wpaper:2017-05&r=gen
  3. By: Shreyasee Das; Nayana Bose
    Abstract: This paper analyzes the intergenerational effects following the positive changes in women's inheritance rights. The amendment to the Hindu Succession Act, the law governing inheritance for Hindus, empowered unmarried daughters at the time of the reform to have equal rights to inherit ancestral property as their brothers. We employ a difference-in-differences strategy and exploit the state level variation in a woman's exposure to the reform. Using the Indian Human Development Survey data for rural India, we find that the property rights reform significantly increased women's education. We find a significant decrease in her sons' education, the effect is magnified in households where fathers are less educated than mothers. We further explore the role of birth order and the gender composition of children to assess the intergenerational impact of this more gender equal inheritance law. Regardless of the child's gender, our results show a significant decrease in educational attainment for younger children.
    JEL: D13 I25 J16 K36 O12
    Date: 2017–12–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:jmp:jm2017:pda789&r=gen
  4. By: YoonKyung Chung; Barbara Downs; Danielle H. Sandler; Robert Sienkiewicz
    Abstract: This paper examines the parental gender earnings gap, the within-couple differences in earnings over time, before and after the birth of a child. The presence and timing of children are important components of the gender wage gap, but there is selection in both decisions. We estimate the earnings gap between male and female spouses over time, which allows us to control for this timing choice as well as other shared external earnings shifters, such as the local labor market. We use Social Security Administration Detail Earnings Records (SSA-DER) data linked to the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) to examine a panel of earnings from 1978 to 2011 for the individuals in the SIPP sample. Our main results show that the spousal earnings gap doubles between two years before the birth of the first child and the year after that child is born. After the child's first year of life the gap continues to grow for the next five years, but at a much slower rate, then tapers off and even begins to fall once the child reaches school-age.
    Date: 2017–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cen:wpaper:17-68&r=gen
  5. By: Tansel, Aysit; Keskin, Halil Ibrahim
    Abstract: The strong relationship between various health indicators and education is widely documented. However, the studies that investigate the nature of causality between these variables became available only recently and provide evidence mostly from developed countries. We add to this literature by studying the causal effect of education on days hospitalized and days out of work for health reasons. We consider two educational reforms. One is the educational expansion of the early 1960s and the other is the 1997 increase in compulsory level of schooling from five to eight years. However, due to the possibility of weak instruments we do not further pursue this avenue. We focus on individuals in two cohorts namely, 1945-1965 which is an older cohort and 1980-1980 which is a younger cohort. We estimate Tobit models as well as Double Hurdle models. The results suggest that an increase in years of education causes to reduce the number of days hospitalized for both men and women unambiguously and the number of days out of work only for men while an increase in education increases the number of days out of work for a randomly selected women.
    JEL: I15 J16 J18 C34 C36
    Date: 2017
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:glodps:156&r=gen
  6. By: Emmanuel Duguet; Loïc du Parquet; Pascale Petit
    Date: 2017
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:tep:teppwp:wp17-11&r=gen

This nep-gen issue is ©2018 by Jan Sauermann. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.