By: |
David E. Allen (School of Accounting, Finance and Economics Edith Cowan University, Australia.);
Michael McAleer (Econometric Institute, Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam and Tinbergen Institute, The Netherlands, Department of Quantitative Economics, Complutense University of Madrid, and Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University.);
Shelton Peiris (School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney);
Abhay K. Singh (School of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Edith Cowan University, Australia) |
Abstract: |
This paper features an analysis of the e_ectiveness of a range of portfolio
diversification strategies as applied to a set of 17 years of monthly hedge
fund index returns on a set of ten market indices representing 13 major hedge
fund categories, as compiled by the EDHEC Risk Institute. The 17-year period
runs from the beginning of 1997 to the end of August 2014. The sample period,
which incorporates both the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and subsequent
European Debt Crisis (EDC), is a challenging one for the application of
diversi_cation and portfolio investment strategies. The analysis features an
examination of the diversification bene_ts of hedge fund investments through
successive crisis periods. The connectedness of the Hedge Fund Indices is
explored via application of the Diebold and Yilmaz (2009, 2014) spillover
index. We conduct a series of portfolio optimisation analyses: comparing
Markowitz with naive diversi_cation, and evaluate the relative e_ectiveness of
Markowitz portfolio optimisation with various draw-down strategies, using a
series of backtests. Our results suggest that Markowitz optimisation matches
the characteristics of these hedge fund indices quite well. |
Keywords: |
Hedge Fund Diversi_cation, Spillover Index, Markowitz Analaysis, Downside Risk, CVaR, Draw-Down. |
JEL: |
G11 C61 |
Date: |
2014 |
URL: |
http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ucm:doicae:1432&r=fmk |