nep-fdg New Economics Papers
on Financial Development and Growth
Issue of 2011‒08‒02
five papers chosen by
Iulia Igescu
Global Insight, GmbH

  1. Changes in taxation and their impact on economic growth in the European Union. By Szarowska, Irena
  2. Immigration, Unemployment and Growth in the Host Country: Bootstrap Panel Granger Causality Analysis on OECD Countries By Boubtane, Ekrame; Coulibaly, Dramane; Rault, Christophe
  3. Crises and the recent recession By Tatom, John
  4. Euro area cross-border financial flows and the global financial crisis By Katrin Forster; Melina Vasardani; Michele Ca’ Zorzi
  5. Competition policy and productivity growth: An empirical assessment By Buccirossi, Paolo; Ciari, Lorenzo; Duso, Tomaso; Spagnolo, Giancarlo; Vitale, Cristiana

  1. By: Szarowska, Irena
    Abstract: The aim of the paper is to analyze changes in taxation and their impact on economic growth in the European Union. The analysis is performed on adjusted annual panel data of 24 European Union countries in a period 1995–2008. Panel regression with fixed effects is used as a basic method of research. The panel regression is based on analysis the effect of total tax quota changes on GDP growth in model 1, of changes in its components (social contribution, direct and indirect tax quotas) in model 2 and of personal and corporate income tax quota changes in model 3. Results of empirical tests verify statistically significant negative effect of tax burden on GDP growth. Total tax quota increased by 1% decreases the GDP growth rate by 0.29% in the same year. Estimations confirm a statistically significant negative effect of direct taxes on GDP growth as well. A cut in the direct tax quota by 1% raises the GDP growth rate by 0.43%. The model also presents a high negative impact of an increase in the corporate income tax quota on GDP growth (a value of the regression coefficient is minus 1.28%) expresses the high negative. The effect of social contribution quota on GDP growth is not statistically significant in any estimation.
    Keywords: taxation; tax burden; economic growth; panel regression
    JEL: E62 C23 H25
    Date: 2010–12–17
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:32354&r=fdg
  2. By: Boubtane, Ekrame (University Paris 1); Coulibaly, Dramane (CEPII, Paris); Rault, Christophe (University of Orléans)
    Abstract: This paper examines the causality relationship between immigration, unemployment and economic growth of the host country. We employ the bootstrap panel Granger causality testing approach of Kónya (2006) that allows to test for causality on each individual country separably by accounting for dependence across countries. Using annual data over the period 1980-2005 for 22 OECD countries, we find that, only in Portugal, unemployment negatively causes immigration, while in any country, immigration does not cause unemployment. We also find that, in France, Iceland, Norway and United Kingdom, growth positively causes immigration, while in any country, immigration does not cause growth.
    Keywords: immigration, growth, unemployment, Granger causality
    JEL: E20 F22 J61
    Date: 2011–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp5853&r=fdg
  3. By: Tatom, John
    Abstract: The United States economy has suffered over the past four years from crises in mortgage foreclosures and in financial markets, as well as a long recession that some have referred to as the Great Recession. The links between these events, or more broadly the causes, extent and effects of these developments, are sources of continuing controversy and uncertainty. This paper attempts to disentangle the links between the mortgage foreclosure crisis, the financial crisis, a possible banking crisis and the Great Recession, at least in terms of timing, and also to provide an alternative view to the conventional wisdom, especially for the link of crises to the recession.
    Keywords: Foreclosure crisis; banking crisis; financial crisis; recession
    JEL: E32 E44
    Date: 2010–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:31914&r=fdg
  4. By: Katrin Forster (European Central Bank, Kaiserstrasse 29, 60311 Frankfurt am Main); Melina Vasardani (Bank of Greece, 21 E. Venizelos Ave., Athens 10250, Greece.); Michele Ca’ Zorzi (European Central Bank, Kaiserstrasse 29, 60311 Frankfurt am Main)
    Abstract: This paper analyses the impact of the global financial crisis on euro area cross-border financial flows by comparing recent developments with the main pre-crisis trends. Two prominent features of the period of turmoil were (i) the sizeable deleveraging of external financial exposures by the private sector and, in particular, the banking sector from 2008 and (ii) the significant changes in the composition of euro area cross-border portfolio flows, as investors shifted from equity to debt instruments, from long-term to short-term debt instruments and from private to public sector securities. Since 2009 such trends have started reversing. However, as balance sheet restructuring by financial and non-financial corporations continues, cross-border financial flows have remained well below pre-crisis levels. The degree of resumption and volatility of cross-border financial activity may have a major bearing on growth prospects for the euro area and may also matter from a financial stability perspective. We argue that the recent experience, first of extraordinary growth and then of scaling down of international financial activity, calls for enhanced monitoring of developments in cross-border financial flows so that the underlying risks to the domestic economy stemming from the financial sector can be better assessed. Looking forward, successful implementation of policy actions to promote macroeconomic discipline and enhance financial regulation and supervision could influence, inter alia, the composition and volume of cross-border capital flows, contributing to a more efficient and sustainable allocation of resources. JEL Classification: E44, E58, F33, F42
    Keywords: Global financial crisis, euro area, capital flows.
    Date: 2011–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ecb:ecbops:20110126&r=fdg
  5. By: Buccirossi, Paolo; Ciari, Lorenzo; Duso, Tomaso; Spagnolo, Giancarlo; Vitale, Cristiana
    Abstract: This paper empirically investigates the effectiveness of competition policy by estimating its impact on Total Factor Productivity (TFP) growth for 22 industries in 12 OECD countries over the period 1995-2005. We find a robust positive and significant effect of competition policy as measured by newly created indexes. We provide several arguments and results based on instrumental variables estimators and non-linearities to support the claim that the established link can be interpreted in a causal way. At a disaggregated level, the effect on TFP growth is particularly strong for specific aspects of competition policy related to its institutional set up and antitrust activities (rather than merger control). The effect is strengthened by good legal systems, suggesting complementarities between competition policy and the efficiency of law enforcement institutions. --
    Keywords: Competition Policy,Productivity Growth,TFP,Institutions,Deterrence,OECD
    JEL: L4 K21 O4 C23
    Date: 2011
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:dicedp:22&r=fdg

This nep-fdg issue is ©2011 by Iulia Igescu. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.