nep-fdg New Economics Papers
on Financial Development and Growth
Issue of 2006‒06‒17
two papers chosen by
Iulia Igescu
Global Insight, GmbH

  1. Worker Remittances and Growth: The Physical and Human Capital Channels By Ziesemer, Thomas
  2. The IMF and the Liberalization of Capital Flows By Joseph P Joyce; Ilan Noy

  1. By: Ziesemer, Thomas (University of Maastricht, Faculty of Economics)
    Abstract: Remittances may have an impact on economic growth through channels to physical and human capital. We estimate two variants of an open economy model of these two channels consisting of seven equations using the general method of moments with heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation correction (GMM-HAC) with pooled data for four different samples of countries receiving remittances in 2003. The countries with per capita income below $1200 benefit most from remittances in the long run because they have the largest impact of remittances on savings. Their remittances account for about 2% of the steady-state level of GDP per capita when compared to the counterfactual of having no remittances. Their ratio of the steady-state growth rates with and without remittances is 1.39. Transitional gains are higher than the steady-state gains only for the human capital variables of this sample. As savings react much more strongly than investment an important benefit of remittances is that less debt is incurred and less debt service is paid than without remittances. The elasticity of the GNI/GDP ratio with respect to the remittance/GDP ratio is .002. All effects are much weaker for the richer countries.
    Keywords: remittances, growth, simultaneous equation model
    JEL: O15 J61 C33
    Date: 2006
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dgr:unumer:2006020&r=fdg
  2. By: Joseph P Joyce (Department of Economics, Wellesley College); Ilan Noy (Department of Economics, University of Hawaii)
    Abstract: Using data from a panel of developing economies from the 1982-98 period, the claim that the International Monetary Fund precipitated financial crises during the 1990s by pressuring countries to liberalize their capital accounts prematurely is evaluated. Examining whether the changes in the regime governing capital flows took place during participation in IMF programs, evidence finds that IMF program participation is correlated with capital account liberalization episodes during the 1990s. Alternative indicators of capital account openness were used to test the robustness of the results by comparing the economic and financial characteristics of countries that decontrolled during IMF programs with those of countries who did so independently to determine whether decontrol was premature.
    JEL: F3
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ewc:wpaper:wp84&r=fdg

This nep-fdg issue is ©2006 by Iulia Igescu. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.