nep-evo New Economics Papers
on Evolutionary Economics
Issue of 2026–06–29
four papers chosen by
Matthew Baker, City University of New York


  1. What explains intensive kinship? Natural environment, religion, and the state By Angeles, Luis; Elizalde, Aldo
  2. Climate and Prehistoric Migration By Peter Huybers; Marco Tabellini; Charles A. Taylor; Francesco Toti
  3. The trust game: A Historical and Methodological Analysis at the Frontier of Experimental and Behavioral Economics By Nicolas Camilotto
  4. Algorithmic cooperation: A comparison with human play in the infinitely repeated prisoner's dilemma By Kasberger, Bernhard; Martin, Simon; Normann, Hans-Theo; Werner, Tobias

  1. By: Angeles, Luis; Elizalde, Aldo
    Abstract: This paper studies the determinants of intensive kinship norms in human societies throughout the world. We expand the existing literature by considering three separate determinants of kinship intensity: the natural environment, religion, and state rule. Our novel methodology takes advantage of recent datasets, linking the location of human societies from the Ethnographic Atlas to geospatial data on the territorial span of states throughout human history. For religion, we find that Islam has an effect of similar magnitude but opposite direction to Christianity. For state rule, we find that only states with high levels of institutional development lead to less intensive kinship norms.
    Keywords: kinship norms, natural environment, religion, Islam, Christianity, state rule, institutional development
    JEL: Z13 Z12 N40 O17 D02 Q56
    Date: 2026
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:qucehw:341402
  2. By: Peter Huybers; Marco Tabellini; Charles A. Taylor; Francesco Toti
    Abstract: What factors drove human migration before modern states, markets, and borders? We develop a sorting framework in which climate-specific subsistence knowledge depreciates with ecological distance. To test this, we use ancient DNA identity-by-descent segments to construct bilateral migration flows across Western Eurasia over the last 10, 000 years. We document three main findings. First, migration flows decline with differences in growing degree days, precipitation, and soil characteristics between origins and destinations. Second, the binding factor varies across subsistence systems: farmers exhibit strong thermal and soil matching, while pastoralists match most strongly on precipitation. Third, periods of warming increase farmer expansion while cooling increases pastoral expansion in patterns that recover known archaeological migration episodes. Migration also acts as a margin of climate adaptation: populations exposed to temperature change move to destinations that partly offset the shift.
    JEL: N01 N50 O13 Q54 Z13
    Date: 2026–06
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35371
  3. By: Nicolas Camilotto (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur, UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur)
    Keywords: Trust, Trust Game
    Date: 2026–05–26
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05659421
  4. By: Kasberger, Bernhard; Martin, Simon; Normann, Hans-Theo; Werner, Tobias
    Abstract: Reinforcement learning algorithms play an increasingly important role in economic situations. These situations are often strategic, and the artificial intelligence may or may not be cooperative. We compare human and algorithmic cooperation rates in the infinitely repeated two-player prisoner's dilemma and study which strategies they choose to cooperate and punish deviations. Through a sequence of computational Q-learning and human-player experiments, we find that our Q-learning algorithms tend to cooperate less than humans, particularly when cooperation is risky or not incentive-compatible. Algorithms often use different strategies than humans, leading to distinct on- and off-path behavior.
    Keywords: Artificial intelligence, cooperation, Q-learning, repeated prisoner's dilemma
    JEL: C72 C73 C92 D83
    Date: 2026
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:dicedp:341427

This nep-evo issue is ©2026 by Matthew Baker. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the Griffith Business School of Griffith University in Australia.