nep-evo New Economics Papers
on Evolutionary Economics
Issue of 2021‒03‒15
four papers chosen by
Matthew Baker
City University of New York

  1. The Evolution of Sectarianism By Ille, Sebastian
  2. On the Origins of the Demographic Transition Rethinking the European Marriage Pattern. By Faustine Perrin
  3. Development and Underdevelopment from the Perspective of Evolutionary Socioeconomics in the Post-COVID-19 Era By Vlados, Charis
  4. Behavioral economics. Forbidden zones. New method and models By Harin, Alexander

  1. By: Ille, Sebastian
    Abstract: Human cooperation for reasons other than self-interest has long intrigued social scientists leading to a substantial literature in economics. Its complement –sectarianism – has not received closer attention in economics despite its significant impact. Based on a dynamic model, the paper shows that sectarianism can be understood as the outcome of a repeated bargaining process in which sectarian affiliation evolves into a pure coordination signal that attributes economic and political benefits. It demonstrates that such sectarian social contracts co-evolve with the sects’ degree of coerciveness and are self-reinforcing. Sectarian conflict may then not be a result of diverging religious ideologies but is shown to be caused by external manipulations of the signal (e.g. via identity politics), and internal political and economic grievances within a sect that spill over to the inter-sectarian level while adopting a sectarian appearance. Theoretical results are supported by empirical findings from the Middle East.
    Keywords: Sectarianism Cooperation, Evolutionary game theory, Agent-based modelling
    JEL: C61 C7 C73 D74 P48 Z1
    Date: 2021–01–18
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:106451&r=all
  2. By: Faustine Perrin
    Abstract: Why did France experience the demographic transition first? This question remains one of the greatest puzzles of economics, demography, and economic history. The French pattern is hard to reconcile with elucidations of the process as found in other countries. The present analysis goes back to the roots of the process and offers novel ways of explaining why people started to control their fertility in France and how they did so. In this paper, I track the evolution of marriage patterns to a point before the premises of the demographic transition. I identify two distinct phases. Next, I rely on exploratory methods to classify French counties based on their discriminatory features. Five profiles emerge. I discuss these profiles through the lens of the French Revolution, one of the greatest events that ever occurred in French history, which irretrievably altered its society. In particular, the results show that the fertility transition was not as linear, but more complex than previous research had argued. They show the importance of accounting for cultural factors and for individuals’ predispositions to adapt more or less quickly to societal changes. Yet cultural factors are not all. They can help to explain the timing of the transition and the choice of methods used to control fertility, but modernity and gender equality are also needed to describe the mechanisms in play behind the process.
    Keywords: Demographic Transition, European Marriage Pattern, French Revolution, Gender Equality, Women Empowerment.
    JEL: J12 J13 J16 N33 O15 O18 Z12
    Date: 2021
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2021-02&r=all
  3. By: Vlados, Charis (Democritus University of Thrace, Department of Economics)
    Abstract: In economics, the problematics of development and underdevelopment is a field of conceptual controversies and constant “re-comprehension,” already since classical economists’ fundamental explorations. Nowadays, especially within the particularly pressing conditions caused by the global pandemic of COVID-19, it seems that this field of research and scientific knowledge must be profoundly re-fertilized in analytical and explanatory terms. The current crisis seems to function as a catalyst for various structural changes globally, leading to a necessary reorientation of the related thematics towards exploring the inner evolutionary “mechanisms” that will drive socio-economic development (and underdevelopment) in the future. This article aims to study the conceptual evolution of the notions of development and underdevelopment in the light of modern evolutionary economics, which we think could offer a foundational repositioning at the interpretative level in response to the new emerging conditions. More specifically, this article tries to respond to what development and underdevelopment mean over time, where analytical readjustments the evolutionary economics lead to nowadays, and whether it is possible to counter-propose a multilevel approach that enriches the theoretical background for an interdisciplinary and unifying understanding of the specific problematics at the dawn of the new global reality that appears in the post-COVID-19 era. At first, we look at essential development and underdevelopment concepts by critically exploring corresponding basic definitions throughout time. Next, we study the essential and associated elements of evolutionary economics, in the light of the problematics of development and underdevelopment of our days, intending to reach a synthesizing theoretical perspective. We counter-propose the multilevel “development web” approach and analysis as a useful repositioned perspective on addressing the developmental/underdevelopmental problem since the compartmentalization of social sciences between the “micro, meso and macro” approaches seems progressively inadequate and sterile.
    Keywords: Development; Underdevelopment; Evolutionary economics; Development web; Micro-meso-macro; Evolutionary microeconomics; Evolutionary mesoeconomics; Evolutionary macroeconomics
    JEL: B52 O40
    Date: 2020–12–30
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ris:duthrp:2020_016&r=all
  4. By: Harin, Alexander
    Abstract: A forbidden zone theorem, hypothesis, and applied mathematical method and model are introduced in the present article. The method and model are based on the forbidden zones and hypothesis. The model is uniformly and successfully applied for different domains. The ultimate goal of the research is to solve some generic problems of behavioral economics.
    Keywords: Expectation; Variation; Boundary; Utility; Prospect theory; Behavioral economics;
    JEL: C02 C1 D8 D81
    Date: 2021–03–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:106545&r=all

This nep-evo issue is ©2021 by Matthew Baker. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.