Abstract: |
After the publication of Keynes’ “General Theory,” economics was frequently
described as schizophrenia: (neo-) classical at the micro-level, but Keynesian
at the macro-level. In actuality, Keynes’ revolution was, to a substantial
part, based on the behavioral micro-foundations of the world we live in, which
has been dismissed as ad hocery, or simply ignored or reclassified in the
neoclassical synthesis. Keynes’ General Theory is truly general. It includes
the full-employment equilibrium as a special case. In addition, its
microeconomic foundations are broader than the extremely narrow behavioral
assumption of the neoclassical model. Consequently, we argue that Keynes’
microeconomics – although not fully worked out - is actually revolutionary.
This may be difficult for (neo-) classical economists to accept, but it is
strongly confirmed by the recent results in behavioral economics. Keynes’
macroeconomics is the result of his microeconomics. Keynes’ theory is a
criticism of (neo-) classical economics, where he offers alternatives from
micro to macro. It is truly a general theory, micro and macro. |