nep-evo New Economics Papers
on Evolutionary Economics
Issue of 2016‒06‒04
three papers chosen by
Matthew Baker
City University of New York

  1. Pursuing the Evolutionary Agenda in Economics and Management Research By Sidney G. Winter
  2. The cultural diffusion of the fertility transition: evidence from internal migration in 19 th century France By Guillaume Daudin; Raphaël Franck; Hillel Rapoport
  3. Global Population Growth, Technology and Malthusian Constraints: A Quantitative Growth Theoretic Perspective By Bruno Lanz; Simon Dietz; Tim Swanson

  1. By: Sidney G. Winter
    Abstract: This essay first reviews what Nelson and Winter were trying to accomplish when they put forward An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press, Harvard, 1982). It then does a fast-forward to controversies and contributions in the recent past, and speculates on where the intellectual enterprise might be headed from here. The issues involved in the original motivations are definitely alive and well. Aside from the review of the basic issues behind the NW project, an important theme here is that an evolutionary approach to economics entails a degree of engagement with the realities of business organization and the quest for profit that has no parallel in mainstream economics. Thus it makes sense in retrospect that the evolutionary program has proved more influential in other research fields, including strategic management, technology studies and organization theory, than it is in economics proper. Recent controversies underscore the continuing existence of a challenging research agenda featuring the interactions among the dynamic processes at different levels - individuals, firms and market environments.
    Date: 2016–05–28
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ssa:lemwps:2016/22&r=evo
  2. By: Guillaume Daudin (LEDa - Laboratoire d'Economie de Dauphine - Université Paris IX - Paris Dauphine); Raphaël Franck (Bar-Ilan University - Bar-Ilan University [Israël]); Hillel Rapoport (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, PSE - Paris School of Economics)
    Abstract: France experienced the demographic transition before richer and more educated countries. This paper offers a novel explanation for this puzzle that emphasizes the diffusion of culture and information through internal migration. It tests how migration affected fertility by building a decennial bilateral migration matrix between French regions for 1861-1911. The identification strategy uses exogenous variation in transportation costs resulting from the construction of railways. The results suggest the convergence towards low birth rates can be explained by the diffusion of low-fertility norms by migrants, especially by migrants to and from Paris.
    Keywords: Fertility,France,Demographic Transition,Migration
    Date: 2016–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:cesptp:halshs-01321952&r=evo
  3. By: Bruno Lanz (IHEID, The Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva); Simon Dietz (LSE, London School of Economics and Political Science); Tim Swanson (IHEID, The Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva)
    Abstract: We structurally estimate a two-sector Schumpeterian growth model with endogenous population and finite land reserves to study the long-run evolution of global population, technological progress and the demand for food. The estimated model closely replicates trajectories for world population, GDP, sectoral productivity growth and crop land area from 1960 to 2010. Projections from 2010 onwards show a slowdown of technological progress, and, because it is a key determinant of fertility costs, significant population growth. By 2100 global population reaches 12.4 billion and agricultural production doubles, but the land constraint does not bind because of capital investment and technological progress.
    Keywords: Global population; Technological progress; Economic growth; Agriculture; Environment; Malthusian constraints; Land conversion; Structural estimation
    JEL: O11 O13 J11 C53 C61 Q15 Q24 Q50
    Date: 2016–05–18
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:gii:giihei:heidwp04-2016&r=evo

This nep-evo issue is ©2016 by Matthew Baker. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.