nep-evo New Economics Papers
on Evolutionary Economics
Issue of 2014‒06‒07
five papers chosen by
Matthew Baker
City University of New York

  1. Culture: Persistence and Evolution By Francesco Giavazzi; Ivan Petkov; Fabio Schiantarelli
  2. Challenging Standard Non-Cooperative Game Theory? From Bacharach's "Variable Frame Theory" to "Team Reasoning" By Lauren Larrouy
  3. The Agricultural Origins of Time Preference By Oded Galor; Ömer Özak
  4. When do the Expectations of Others Matter? An Experiment on Distributional Justice and Guilt Aversion By Riccardo Ghidoni; Matteo Ploner
  5. Children's Growth in an Adaptive Framework: Explaining the Growth Patterns of American Slaves and Other Historical Populations By Eric B. Schneider

  1. By: Francesco Giavazzi; Ivan Petkov; Fabio Schiantarelli
    Abstract: This paper presents evidence on the speed of evolution (or lack thereof) of a wide range of values and beliefs of different generations of European immigrants to the US. The main result is that persistence differs greatly across cultural attitudes. Some, for instance deep personal religious values, some family and moral values, and political orientation converge very slowly to the prevailing US norm. Other, such as attitudes toward cooperation, redistribution, effort, children's independence, premarital sex, and even the frequency of religious practice or the intensity of association with one's religion, converge rather quickly. The results obtained studying higher generation immigrants differ greatly from those found when the analysis is limited to the second generation, as typically done in the literature, and they imply a lesser degree of persistence than previously thought. Finally, we show that persistence is "culture specific" in the sense that the country from which one's ancestors came matters for the pattern of generational convergence.
    JEL: A13 F22 J00 J61 Z1
    Date: 2014–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:20174&r=evo
  2. By: Lauren Larrouy (University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, France; GREDEG CNRS)
    Abstract: The paper purports to stress how the two major contributions of Bacharach: "Variable Frame Theory" (VFT) and "Team Reasoning" (TR) improve Standard Non-Cooperative Game Theory in some relevant aspects which I point out. The aims are to show: (i) how Bacharach respectively justifies coordination and cooperation within these theories, and (ii) how these improvements in both VFT and TR involve a new conception of players and their rationality. I underline how coordination and cooperation rely on contextual and social determinants, which challenge and even contradict some pillars of standard individual rationality in terms of subjective expected utility, in games. Even if Bacharach's conceptual and methodological choices within these theories induce numerous difficulties, I try to show that Bacharach’s work underlines some of the implications and related problems induced by the mere foundations of standard non-cooperation game theory.
    Keywords: non-cooperative game theory, framing, salience, focal points, Team Reasoning, coordination, cooperation, individual rationality, social rationality, collective rationality
    JEL: B21 B41 C72 D03 D79
    Date: 2014–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:gre:wpaper:2014-17&r=evo
  3. By: Oded Galor (Brown University); Ömer Özak (Southern Methodist University)
    Abstract: This research explores the origins of the distribution of time preference across regions. It advances the hypothesis, and establishes empirically, that geographical variations in the incentives to delay consumption in favor of lucrative investment opportunities have had a persistent effect on the distribution of long-term orientation across societies. In particular, exploiting a natural experiment associated with the Columbian Exchange, the research establishes that agro-climatic characteristics in the pre-industrial era that were conducive to higher return to agricultural investment, triggered selection and learning processes that had a persistent positive effect on the prevalence of long-term orientation in the contemporary era.
    Keywords: Time preference, Delayed Gratification, Culture, Agriculture, Economic Development, Evolution
    JEL: O1 Z1
    Date: 2014–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:smu:ecowpa:1407&r=evo
  4. By: Riccardo Ghidoni; Matteo Ploner
    Abstract: In a modified dictator game experiment, we study how distributional justice, measured by the proportionality between effort exerted and rewards obtained, and guilt feelings triggered by others’ expectations affect dictator’s choices. We consider these two sources of behavior in isolation and in interaction. Our results suggest that both justice concerns and guilt aversion are important drivers of behavior. However, the expectations of others are more relevant when the choice environment is likely to induce less equitable outcomes.
    Keywords: Justice, Guilt Aversion, Entitlement Rights, Experiments
    Date: 2014
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:trn:utwpce:1403&r=evo
  5. By: Eric B. Schneider
    Abstract: This paper presents a new adaptive framework for understanding children's growth in the past.� Drawing upon the recent work of Gluckman and Hanson (2006) and their co-authors on adaptive responses in relation to growth, I present three prenatal and three postnatal adaptive mechanisms that affect the growth patterns of children.� The most novel adaptive response to the historical literature is the prenatal predictive adaptive response where the foetus develops assuming that the postnatal environment will closely match prenatal conditions.� Thus, the metalbolism and growth trajectory of a child is programmed during the prenatal period: children experiencing good conditions�in utero would have a higher metabolism and growth trajectory than their counterparts facing poor conditions.� Having discussed the framework and other responses in detail, I then use it to reinterpret the growth pattern of American slaves (Steckel, 1979, 1986).� I argue that the mismatch between relatively good conditions in utero and absolutely appalling conditions in infancy and early childhood led slave children to become incredibly stunted by age three or four.� However, after this age, slave children experienced rapid catch-up growth, first because their immune systems had become more developed and had adapted to the poor disease environment and later because their diet improved tremendously and hookworm exposure was reduced when they entered the labour force around age ten.� Thus, American slave children were able to experience rapid catch-up growth because they were prenatally programmed for a higher metabolism and growth trajectory.� The paper concludes by setting out some stylized facts about children's growth in the past and pointing toward areas of future research.
    Date: 2014–05–29
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:oxf:wpaper:number-130&r=evo

This nep-evo issue is ©2014 by Matthew Baker. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.