nep-evo New Economics Papers
on Evolutionary Economics
Issue of 2006‒11‒25
two papers chosen by
Matthew Baker
US Naval Academy, USA

  1. Distinguishing Social Preferences from Preferences for Altruism By Raymond Fisman; Shachar Kariv; Daniel Markovits
  2. Behavioural Development Economics: Lessons from field labs in the developing world By Jeffery Carpenter; Juan Camilo Cardenas

  1. By: Raymond Fisman (Graduate School of Business, Columbia University); Shachar Kariv (Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley); Daniel Markovits (Yale Law School)
    Abstract: We report a laboratory experiment that enables us to distinguish preferences for altruism (concerning tradeoffs between own payoffs and the payoffs of others) from social preferences (concerning tradeoffs between the payoffs of others). By using graphical representations of three-person Dictator Games that vary the relative prices of giving, we generate a very rich data set well-suited to studying behavior at the level of the individual subject. We attempt to recover subjects’ underlying preferences by estimating a constant elasticity of substitution (CES) model that represents altruistic and social preferences. We find that both social preferences and preferences for altruism are highly heterogeneous, ranging from utilitarian to Rawlsian. In spite of this heterogeneity across subjects, there exists a strong positive withinsubject correlation between the efficiency-equity tradeoffs made in altruistic and social preferences.
    JEL: C79 C91 D64
    Date: 2005–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ads:wpaper:0061&r=evo
  2. By: Jeffery Carpenter; Juan Camilo Cardenas
    Abstract: Explanations of poverty, growth and development more generally depend on the assumptions made about individual preferences and the willingness to engage in strategic behaviour. Economic experiments, especially those conducted in the field, have begun to paint a picture of economic agents in developing communities that is at some variance from the traditional portrait. We review this growing literature with an eye towards preference-related experiments conducted in the field. We rely on these studies, in addition to our own experiences in the field, to offer lessons on what development economists might learn from experiments. We conclude by sharing our thoughts on how to conduct experiments in the field, and then offer a few ideas for future research.
    Date: 2006
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:mdl:mdlpap:0616&r=evo

This nep-evo issue is ©2006 by Matthew Baker. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.