nep-ent New Economics Papers
on Entrepreneurship
Issue of 2006‒09‒16
six papers chosen by
Marcus Dejardin
Facultes Universitaires Notre-Dame de la Paix

  1. The Jack-of-All-Trades Entrepreneur: Innate Talent or Acquired Skill? By Olmo Silva
  2. Currents and Sub-currents in the River of Innovations - Explaining Innovativeness using New-Product Announcements By Dolfsma, W.; Panne, G. van der
  3. Managing Supplier Involvement in New Product Development: A Multiple-Case Study By Echtelt, F.E.A. van; Wynstra, J.Y.F.; Weele, A.J. van; Duysters, G.
  4. Banks, Distances and Financing Constraints for Firms By Pietro ALESSANDRINI; Alberto ZAZZARO; Andrea PRESBITERO
  5. How Rapidly Does Science Leak Out? By James D. Adams; J. Roger Clemmons; Paula E. Stephan
  6. Hiring Freeze and Bankruptcy in Unemployment Dynamics By Pietro Garibaldi

  1. By: Olmo Silva (CEP, London School of Economics and IZA Bonn)
    Abstract: Cross-sectional tests of the Jack-of-All-Trades theory of entrepreneurship invariably conclude that accumulation of balanced skill-mix across different fields of expertise stimulates entrepreneurship. Yet, none of these considers individual unobservable characteristics which may simultaneously determine skill accumulation and occupational choice. Using panel techniques to control for this, I show that gathering expertise across various subjects does not increase the chances of becoming entrepreneur.
    Keywords: entrepreneurship, occupational choice, skills
    JEL: M13 J23 J24
    Date: 2006–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp2264&r=ent
  2. By: Dolfsma, W.; Panne, G. van der (Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), RSM Erasmus University)
    Abstract: In their seminal paper, Acs and Audretsch (1988) analyze innovation patterns across industries and identify several determinants of innovativeness, both positive and negative. Their work is seminal if only because of the unique data they use to measure innovativeness: new-product announcements. They show that industry concentration, degree of unionization would hamper innovation; industries characterized by increased shares of skilled labor and large firms provide favorable conditions for innovation. By analyzing a new and more consciously compiled database, we re-examine their original claims. Our results largely support the findings of Acs & Audretsch, but diverge from them in one important way. We suggest that the large firms do not contribute more to a industry?s innovativeness than small firms ? a vindication of the Schumpeter Mark I perspective. In addition, we analyze micro-level data of individual firms. Firms within different sub-groups respond differently to their competitive environment. We show that less dedicated innovators prove more susceptible to environmental factors than more committed innovators. In addition, an unfavorable competitive environment decreases the likelihood that less successful innovators will announce new products.
    Keywords: Innovation;New-Product Announcements;Innovation Sub-Currents;Schumpeter Mark I;
    Date: 2006–09–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dgr:eureri:30008873&r=ent
  3. By: Echtelt, F.E.A. van; Wynstra, J.Y.F.; Weele, A.J. van; Duysters, G. (Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), RSM Erasmus University)
    Abstract: Existing studies of supplier involvement in new product development have mainly focused on project-related short-term processes and success-factors. This study validates and extends an existing exploratory framework, which comprises both long-term strategic processes and short-term operational processes that are related to supplier involvement. The empirical validation is based on a multiple-case study of supplier collaborations at a manufacturer in the copier and printer industry. The analysis of eight cases of supplier involvement reveals that the results of supplier-manufacturer collaborations and the associated issues and problems can best be explained by the patterns in the extent to which the manufacturer manages supplier involvement in the short-term ?nd the long-term. We find that our initial framework is helpful in understanding why certain collaborations are not effectively managed, yet conclude that the existing analytical distinction between four different management areas does not sufficiently reflect empirical reality. This leads us to reconceptualize and further detail the framework. Instead of four managerial areas, we propose to distinguish between the Strategic Management arena and the Operational Management arena. The Strategic Management arena contains processes that together provide long-term, strategic direction and operational support for project teams adopting supplier involvement. These processes also contribute to building up a supplier base that can meet current and future technology and capability needs. The Operational Management arena contains processes that are aimed at planning, managing and evaluating the actual collaborations in a specific development project. The results of this study suggest that success of involving suppliers in product development is reflected by the firm?s ability to capture both short-term and long-term benefits. If companies spend most of their time on operational management in development projects, they will fail to use the ?leverage? effect of planning and preparing such involvement through strategic management activities. Also, they will not be sufficiently able to capture possible long-term technology and learning benefits that may spin off from individual projects. Long-term collaboration benefits can only be captured if a company can build long-term relationships with key suppliers, where it builds learning routines and ensures that the capability sets of both parties are aligned and remain useful for future joint projects.
    Keywords: New Product Development;Innovation;R&D Management;Supplier Relations;Purchasing;
    Date: 2006–09–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dgr:eureri:30008874&r=ent
  4. By: Pietro ALESSANDRINI (Universita' Politecnica delle Marche, Dipartimento di Economia); Alberto ZAZZARO (Universita' Politecnica delle Marche, Dipartimento di Economia); Andrea PRESBITERO ([n.a.])
    Abstract: The wave of bank mergers and acquisitions experienced in European and U.S. credit markets during the Nineties has deeply changed the geography of banking industry. While the number of bank branches has increased in almost every country, reducing the operational distance between banks and borrowers, bank decisional centres and strategic functions have been concentrated in only a few places within each nation, increasing the functional distance between banks and local communities. In this paper, we carry out a multivariate analysis to assess the correlation of functional and operational distances with local borrowers' financing constraints. We apply our analysis on Italian data at the local market level defined as provinces. Our findings consistently show that increased functional distance makes financing constraints more binding, it being positively associated with the probability of firms being rationed, investment-cash flow sensitivity, and the ratio of credit lines utilized by borrowers to credit lines make available by banks. These adverse effects are particularly evident for small firms and for firms located in southern Italian provinces. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the negative impact on financing constraints following the actual increased functional distance over the period 1996-2003 has substantially offset (and sometimes exceeded) the beneficial effects of the increased diffusion of bank branches occurring during the same period.
    Keywords: financing constraints, funtional distance, local banking system, operational proximity
    JEL: G21 G34 R51
    Date: 2006–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:anc:wpaper:266&r=ent
  5. By: James D. Adams; J. Roger Clemmons; Paula E. Stephan
    Abstract: In science as well as technology, the diffusion of new ideas influences innovation and productive efficiency. With this as motivation we use citations to scientific papers to measure the diffusion of science through the U.S. economy. To indicate the speed of diffusion we rely primarily on the modal or most frequent lag. Using this measure we find that diffusion between universities as well as between firms and universities takes an average of three years. The lag on science diffusion between firms is 3.3 years, compared with 4.8 years in technology for the same companies using the same methodology. Industrial science diffuses fifty per cent more rapidly than technology, and academic science diffuses still faster. Thus the priority publication system in science appears to distribute information more rapidly than the patent system, although other interpretations are possible. We also find that the speed of science diffusion in the same field varies by a factor of two across industries. The industry variation turns out to be driven by frictional publication lags and firm size in R&D and science. Friction increases the lag, but firm size in R&D and science decrease it. Industries having a lot of R&D or science and composed of fields with little friction exhibit rapid diffusion. Industries where the reverse is true exhibit slow diffusion.
    JEL: O3 L3
    Date: 2006–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:11997&r=ent
  6. By: Pietro Garibaldi (University of Turin, Collegio Carlo Alberto, IGIER, CEPR and IZA Bonn)
    Abstract: This paper proposes a matching model that distinguishes between job creation by existing firms and job creation by firm entrants. The paper argues that vacancy posting and job destruction on the extensive margin, i.e. from firms that enter and exit the labour market, represents a viable mechanism for understanding the cyclical properties of vacancies and unemployment. The model features both hiring freeze and bankruptcies, where the former represents a sudden shut down of vacancy posting at the firm level with labour downsizing governed by natural turnover. A bankrupt firm, conversely, shut down its vacancies and lay offs its stock of workers. Recent research in macroeconomics has shown that a calibration of the Mortensen and Pissarides matching model account for 10 percent of the cyclical variability of the vacancy unemployment ratio displayed by U.S. data. A calibration of the model that explicitly considers hiring freeze and bankruptcy can account for 20 to 35 percent of the variability displayed by the data.
    Keywords: unemployment dynamics, matching models
    JEL: J30
    Date: 2006–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp2263&r=ent

This nep-ent issue is ©2006 by Marcus Dejardin. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.