nep-edu New Economics Papers
on Education
Issue of 2025–03–17
five papers chosen by
Nádia Simões, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa 


  1. Access, achievements, and aspirations: The impacts of school tracking on student outcomes By Bach, Maximilian; Klein, Thilo; McNamara, Sarah
  2. The Impact of Comprehensive Student Support on Crime: Evidence from the Pathways to Education Program By Adam Lavecchia; Philip Oreopoulos; Noah Spencer
  3. Home broadband and human capital formation By Sanchis-Guarner, Rosa; Montalbán, José; Weinhardt, Felix
  4. Experimental Evaluation of a Financial Education Program in Elementary and Middle School Grades By Piza, Caio; Furtado, Isabela Brandao; Amorim, Vivian De Fatima
  5. Coaching and Implementation: Insights from a Field Experiment in Danish Schools By Andersen, Simon Calmar; Michel, Bastien; Nielsen, Helena Skyt

  1. By: Bach, Maximilian; Klein, Thilo; McNamara, Sarah
    Abstract: Though the use of tracking policies to stratify students is commonplace, evi- dence concerning the effects of ability-based tracking on student performance is mixed. Using rich data from the Hungarian secondary school centralized assignment mechanism and a quasi-experimental framework, we find that at- tending the highest track noticeably improves standardized test scores and university aspirations two years post-match. Heterogeneity analysis finds this effect is independent of socioeconomic status, prior achievement, and parents' educational attainment, and we find only limited evidence of peer spillover effects in terms of academic ability. Given socioeconomic disparities in track placement, tracking may reinforce educational inequality.
    Keywords: education, school choice, tracking, centralized school admissions, student achievement, inequality of opportunity
    JEL: I21 I24 I28 E47 C26
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:zewdip:312194
  2. By: Adam Lavecchia; Philip Oreopoulos; Noah Spencer
    Abstract: This paper presents estimates of the causal effect of a comprehensive support program for low-income high school students on crime. The program, called Pathways to Education, bundles a number of supports including regular coaching, tutoring, group activities, free public transportation tickets and bursaries for postsecondary education. Our empirical strategy uses administrative data on high school enrollment linked to administrative court records and a difference-in-differences methodology that compares the evolution of crime outcomes of students living in the public housing communities where Pathways operates to similar public housing students who are ineligible for the program. We find that eligibility for Pathways reduces the likelihood of being charged with a crime at its Regent Park location by 6 percentage points (33 percent of the pre-treatment mean) and has no statistically significant effect at its Rexdale and Lawrence Heights locations. Our results suggest that the reductions in criminal activity are driven by the reduction of property crimes.
    Keywords: low-income youth, education and crime, youth programs
    JEL: I24 I26 I28 L31
    Date: 2025
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ces:ceswps:_11676
  3. By: Sanchis-Guarner, Rosa; Montalbán, José; Weinhardt, Felix
    Abstract: Using administrative data, we estimate the effect of home broadband speed on student-level value-added test scores. Our headline estimate relies on jumps in connection quality between close neighbours that occur across thousands of invisible telephone exchange station catchment-area boundaries. We find that increasing speed by 1 Mbit/s increases test scores by 1.37 percentile ranks, equivalent to 5% of a standard deviation. School-level factors or broadband take-up cannot explain this. Instead, the positive effects are concentrated among high-ability and non-free-school-meal eligible students and result from more education-oriented internet use. Differences in ICT quality can thus lead to increasing education inequalities.
    Keywords: broadband; education; spatial regression discontinuity
    JEL: J24 I21 I28 D83
    Date: 2024–02–08
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ehl:lserod:126832
  4. By: Piza, Caio; Furtado, Isabela Brandao; Amorim, Vivian De Fatima
    Abstract: This paper investigates whether providing financial education in elementary and middle school grades improves students' financial proficiency and actual behavior. It uses a cluster randomized control trial to evaluate a pilot program implemented in 101 Brazilian municipal schools in 2015. The findings show positive impacts on financial proficiency, mainly among middle school students, and suggestive evidence of improvements in short-term behavioral outcomes. However, the analysis indicates that the program did not impact students' school achievements in both the short and longer terms, which suggests that the program's effects were not strong enough to shift students' behavior decisions.
    Date: 2023–06–28
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:10511
  5. By: Andersen, Simon Calmar (Aarhus University); Michel, Bastien (Aarhus University); Nielsen, Helena Skyt (Aarhus University)
    Abstract: We study the effect of peer coaching separately from the effect of training on teachers' implementation of new teaching techniques. We conducted a preregistered field experiment involving 68 teachers and 1, 490 students in Denmark. Teachers in an active control group took part in a teaching program that introduced new teaching techniques. On top of the teaching program, the treatment group received coaching from peers. External observers, blinded to the treatment status, assessed teachers' use of the program techniques in the classroom. While we observe increased transfer to teachers' practices, the overall effects are mixed, calling for caution.
    Keywords: coaching, knowledge transfer, school teachers, field experiment
    JEL: I21 J24
    Date: 2025–02
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17728

This nep-edu issue is ©2025 by Nádia Simões. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.