|
on Education |
Issue of 2006‒02‒12
twelve papers chosen by Joao Carlos Correia Leitao Universidade da Beira Interior |
By: | Stefano STAFFOLANI (Universita' Politecnica delle Marche, Dipartimento di Economia); Enzo VALENTINI |
Abstract: | In this paper we analyze intergenerational mobility on education. After a brief empirical analysis of the influence of family background on educational attainment, we present a dynamic model where the decisions concerning education may be financially constrained. Therefore, people who get higher educational levels are not necessarily the most talented. This "misallocation effect" causes a reduction in the efficiency of the economic system. We show that a proportional bequest taxation, whose yield is redistributed among all "youths", increases efficiency. |
Keywords: | bequest, education, talent allocation |
JEL: | D33 I22 I30 J24 |
Date: | 2006–01 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:anc:wpaper:248&r=edu |
By: | Charlotte Christiansen (Aarhus School of Business); Juanna Schröter Joensen (University of Aarhus); Helena Skyt Nielsen (University of Aarhus and IZA Bonn) |
Abstract: | In this paper we analyze investments in human capital assets in a way which is standard for financial assets, but not (yet) for human capital assets. We study mean-variance plots of human capital assets. We compare the properties of human capital returns using a performance measure and by using tests for mean-variance spanning. A risk-return trade-off is revealed, which is not only related to the length of education but also to the type of education. We identify a range of educations that are efficient in terms of investment goods, and a range of educations that are inefficient, and may be chosen for consumption purposes. |
Keywords: | educational choice, efficient frontier, human capital investment, mean-variance analysis |
JEL: | I21 J24 |
Date: | 2006–02 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp1962&r=edu |
By: | Philippe Mahler (Socioeconomic Institute, University of Zurich); Rainer Winkelmann (Socioeconomic Institute, University of Zurich) |
Abstract: | We examine the effect of single motherhood on children’s secondary school track choice using 12-year-old children drawn from the German Socio-Economic Panel. In line with previous studies for the U.S., the U.K. and Sweden, we find a negative correlation between single motherhood and children’s educational attainment. Looking for alternative explanations for this correlation, we use probit regression models to control for factors related to single motherhood such as higher educational background, lower household income and higher labor supply of the mother. Our evidence suggests that single motherhood reduces school attainment mainly because it is associated with lower resources (household income) available for the child. |
Keywords: | school choice, educational attainment, binary response model, German Socio-Economic Panel |
JEL: | I21 J12 |
Date: | 2005–09 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:soz:wpaper:0512&r=edu |
By: | Philippe Mahler (Socioeconomic Institute, University of Zurich); Rainer Winkelmann (Socioeconomic Institute, University of Zurich) |
Abstract: | In present day Germany, one in seven children is raised in a single parent household. We investigate the effect of single parenthood on children’s educational attainment, measured by the school track at the age 14, using ordered probit models. We study whether the effect of living in single parenthood during early or late childhood differs. Finally, we ask whether the family effect operates through resources – fewer income and parental time available for the child –, or through adverse effects on psychological well-being. The data used in this study are a nationally representative sample of 14 year old children drawn from the German Socio-Economic Panel. |
Keywords: | school choice, educational attainment, ordered response model |
JEL: | I21 J12 |
Date: | 2004–09 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:soz:wpaper:0415&r=edu |
By: | Jan M. Hoem (Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany); Gerda R. Neyer (Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany); Gunnar Andersson (Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany) |
Abstract: | In this paper, we extend the concept of educational attainment to cover the field of education attained in addition to the conventional level of education. Our empirical investigation uses register records containing childbearing and educational histories of an entire cohort of women born in Sweden (about a quarter-million individuals). This allows us to operate with a high number of educational field-and-level combinations (some sixty in all). It turns out that the field of education serves as an indicator of a woman’s potential reproductive behavior better than the mere level. We discover that in each field permanent childlessness increases (some) with the educational level attained, but that the field itself is the more important. In general, we find that women educated for jobs in teaching and health care are in a class of their own, with much lower permanent childlessness than in any other major grouping at each educational level. Women educated in arts and humanities or for religious occupations have unusually high fractions permanently childless. Our results cast doubt on the assumption that higher education per se must result in higher childlessness. In our opinion, several factors intrinsic and extrinsic to an educational system (such as its flexibility, its gender structure, and the manner in which education is hooked up to the labor market) may influence the relationship between education and childlessness, and we would not expect a simple, unidirectional relationship. |
Keywords: | Sweden, education, fertility |
JEL: | J1 Z0 |
Date: | 2005–06 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dem:wpaper:wp-2005-014&r=edu |
By: | Christopher Cornwell (University of Georgia); David B. Mustard (University of Georgia and IZA Bonn) |
Abstract: | In the last fifteen years there has been a significant increase in merit aid. Coincident with this increase in merit aid has been increased attention to sorting in various aspects of life, especially in education. This paper examines the extent to which merit-based aid exacerbates or ameliorates sorting by ability in higher education. We use panel data from Peterson’s Guide to Colleges and the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) to evaluate this relationship. Our difference-in-differences estimates show that HOPE increased the quality of entering freshmen in Georgia institutions relative to their outof- state peers. At the highest-quality institutions HOPE raised all measures of student quality and the homogeneity of students by ability. The lowest-quality institutions experienced no statistically significant effect from HOPE on any measure of student quality. We conclude that state-sponsored merit aid programs increased the retention of high ability students for college and also increased the ability stratification of institutions within states. We also examined two indirect measures of student selectivity-acceptance and yield rates. HOPE decreases acceptance rates at all types of institutions, but the percentage change is largest at the universities, which are most space constrained. HOPE increased yield rates for universities but not for any other institution categories. Together these results suggest that HOPE substantially increased the selectivity at universities. |
Keywords: | education, sorting, stratification |
JEL: | I2 |
Date: | 2006–01 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp1956&r=edu |
By: | Stephen P. Jenkins (Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, and DIW Berlin); John Micklewright (Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute (S3RI) and School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton); Sylke V. Schnepf (S3RI, University of Southampton) |
Abstract: | We provide new evidence about the degree of social segregation in England’s secondary schools, employing a cross-national perspective. Analysis is based on data for 27 rich industrialised countries from the 2000 and 2003 rounds of the Programme of International Student Assessment (PISA), using a number of different measures of social background and of segregation, and allowing for sampling variation in the estimates. England is shown to be a middle-ranking country, as is the USA. High segregation countries include Austria, Belgium, Germany and Hungary. Low segregation countries include the four Nordic countries and Scotland. In explaining England’s position, we argue that its segregation is mostly accounted for by unevenness in social background in the state school sector. Focusing on this sector, we show that cross-country differences in segregation are associated with the prevalence of selective choice of pupils by schools. Low-segregation countries such as those in the Nordic area and Scotland have negligible selection in schools. High segregation countries like Austria, Germany and Hungary have separate school tracks for academic and vocational schooling and, in each case, over half of this is accounted for by unevenness in social background between the different tracks rather than by differences within each track. |
Keywords: | social segregation, secondary schools, England, cross-national comparison, PISA. |
JEL: | D39 I21 I39 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:inq:inqwps:ecineq2006-27&r=edu |
By: | Martin Spielauer (Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany) |
Abstract: | In this paper, we explore the inter-individual diversity in fertility among women in Austria for the female birth cohorts 1917-1961. Comparative studies revealed that all Western countries have witnessed a decline in the concentration of reproduction during the 20th century, a trend that has reversed for the most recent cohorts that have reached the end of their reproductive period. This reversal, mainly triggered by an increase in childlessness, has been far less pronounced in Austria and limited to urban municipalities. Changes in fertility and concentration have followed very different trajectories by educational attainment as well as by the type of municipality in which women lived at age 15. Within educational categories, we found large differentials by profession and intergenerational educational mobility. A consequence of the concentration of reproduction is that the level of cohort fertility differs from the average sibship size seen from the children’s perspective. In the Austrian case, in contrast to the pronounced fertility differentials by educational attainment, the average sibship size experienced by children became almost independent of parents’ education. In difference to the negative correlation between fertility and concentration found in earlier studies for the first demographic transition and the baby boom, the fertility level and concentration moved in the same direction, and did so for an extended time period following the baby boom, accelerating changes from the children’s perspective. |
Keywords: | Austria, family composition, fertility trends |
JEL: | J1 Z0 |
Date: | 2005–04 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dem:wpaper:wp-2005-012&r=edu |
By: | Marcel Fafchamps (University of Oxford); Jackline Wahba (University of Southampton and IZA Bonn) |
Abstract: | Using detailed survey data from Nepal, this paper examines the determinants of child labor with a special emphasis on urban proximity. We find that children residing in or near urban centers attend school more and work less in total but are more likely to be involved in wage work or in a small business. The larger the urban center, the stronger the effect is. Urban proximity is found to reduce the workload of children and improve school attendance up to 3 hours of travel time from the city. In areas of commercialized agriculture located 3 to 7 hours from the city, children do more farm work. Urban proximity effects are accounted for by a combination of local labor supply and demand conditions, most notably the local importance of agriculture, the education level of the parents, and the local wage rate. Child servants, which represent a small proportion of all children, work much harder than other children and appear particularly at risk. |
Keywords: | child labour, Nepal, child schooling, urban proximity |
JEL: | J10 J22 J24 J40 N35 |
Date: | 2006–02 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp1966&r=edu |
By: | Ours,Jan C. van (Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research) |
Abstract: | This paper investigates the reading of fiction books by 15-year-olds in 18 OECD countries. It appears that girls fiction books more often than boys, whereas boys read comic books more often than girls. The intensity by which children read fiction books is influenced by parental education, family structure, and the number of books and tv's at home. Reading comic books does not affect the reading of fiction books. Parents who want their children to read fiction books frequently should have a lot of books at home and at most one television. |
Keywords: | reading;PISA-data; books |
JEL: | L82 Z11 |
Date: | 2006 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dgr:kubcen:200603&r=edu |
By: | Eric Canton; Bert Minne; Ate Nieuwenhuis; Marc van der Steeg |
Abstract: | Long-run per capita economic growth is driven by productivity growth. Major determinants of productivity are investments in education and research, and the intensity of competition on product markets. While these ideas have been incorporated into modern growth theories and tested in empirical analyses, they have not yet found their way to applied macroeconomic models used to forecast economic developments. In this paper, we discuss various options to include human capital, R&D, and product market competition in a macroeconomic framework. We also study how policy can affect the decisions to build human capital or to perform research, and how competition policy impacts on macroeconomic outcomes. We finally sketch how these mechanisms can be implemented into the large models used at CPB. |
Keywords: | Human capital; R&D; competition; applied macroeconomic mode |
JEL: | O40 |
Date: | 2005–07 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cpb:docmnt:91&r=edu |
By: | Joëlle Noailly; Daniël Waagmeester; Bas Jacobs; Marieke Rensman; Dinand Webbink |
Abstract: | Scarcity of science and engineering (S&E) graduates could potentially call for government intervention, because of the role of S&E's in R&D, and because R&D in turn is characterised by positive spillovers. In this report, we investigate whether policies that stimulate enrolment in S&E-studies are effective at increasing R&D-activity. First, we analyse the situation on the Dutch labour market for S&E graduates. We do not find evidence for scarcity of S&E graduates. Rather, the labour market position vis-à-vis other graduates weakened. A possible explanation to reconcile this conclusion with a widely felt concern of S&E shortages among employers is increasing internationalisation of the S&E labour market. Concerning policy, we argue that expanding the stock of S&E graduates is not very effective for boosting R&D activity. More than half the number of S&E graduates do not end up working in R&D. De increasing internationalisation of the S&E labour market can diminish the attractiveness of S&E courses. |
Keywords: | R&D; education policy; science and engineering labour market |
JEL: | O38 J31 H52 |
Date: | 2005–07 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cpb:docmnt:92&r=edu |