nep-ecm New Economics Papers
on Econometrics
Issue of 2017‒07‒30
twelve papers chosen by
Sune Karlsson
Örebro universitet

  1. Frequency-Domain Estimation as an Alternative to Pre-Filtering External Cycles in Structural VAR Analysis By Lovcha, Yuliya; Pérez Laborda, Alejandro
  2. An Alternative Estimation of a Time-Varying Parameter Model By Mikio Ito; Akihiko Noda; Tatsuma Wada
  3. Causal Inference Using Potential Outcomes for a General Assignment Scheme By Rahul Mukherjee
  4. Analytic Bias Correction for Maximum Likelihood Estimators When the Bias Function is Non-Constant By Ryan T. Godwin & David E. Giles
  5. Regression Discontinuity in Time: Considerations for Empirical Applications By Catherine Hausman; David S. Rapson
  6. The convergence of the gender pay gap: An alternative estimation approach By Castagnetti, Carolina; Rosti, Luisa; Töpfer, Marina
  7. A Note on Nonparametric Identification of Distributions of Random Coefficients in Multinomial Choice Models By Jeremy T. Fox
  8. A new semiparametric approach for mediation analyses By Gloria Gheno
  9. Combinatorial Discrete Choice By Fabian Eckert; Costas Arkolakis
  10. Redefine Statistical Significance By Daniel Benjamin; James Berger; Magnus Johannesson; Brian Nosek; E. Wagenmakers; Richard Berk; Kenneth Bollen; Bjorn Brembs; Lawrence Brown; Colin Camerer; David Cesarini; Christopher Chambers; Merlise Clyde; Thomas Cook; Paul De Boeck; Zoltan Dienes; Anna Dreber; Kenny Easwaran; Charles Efferson; Ernst Fehr; Fiona Fidler; Andy Field; Malcom Forster; Edward George; Tarun Ramadorai; Richard Gonzalez; Steven Goodman; Edwin Green; Donald Green; Anthony Greenwald; Jarrod Hadfield; Larry Hedges; Leonhard Held; Teck Hau Ho; Herbert Hoijtink; James Jones; Daniel Hruschka; Kosuke Imai; Guido Imbens; John Ioannidis; Minjeong Jeon; Michael Kirchler; David Laibson; John List; Roderick Little; Arthur Lupia; Edouard Machery; Scott Maxwell; Michael McCarthy; Don Moore; Stephen Morgan; Marcus Munafo; Shinichi Nakagawa; Brendan Nyhan; Timothy Parker; Luis Pericchi; Marco Perugini; Jeff Rouder; Judith Rousseau; Victoria Savalei; Felix Schonbrodt; Thomas Sellke; Betsy Sinclair; Dustin Tingley; Trisha Zandt; Simine Vazire; Duncan Watts; Christopher Winship; Robert Wolpert; Yu Xie; Cristobal Young; Jonathan Zinman; Valen Johnson
  11. Stock Prediction: a method based on extraction of news features and recurrent neural networks By Zeya Zhang; Weizheng Chen; Hongfei Yan
  12. Testing for Granger causality in panel data By Luciano Lopez; Sylvain Weber

  1. By: Lovcha, Yuliya; Pérez Laborda, Alejandro
    Abstract: This paper shows that the frequency domain estimation of VAR models over a frequency band can be a good alternative to pre-filtering the data when a low-frequency cycle contaminates some of the variables. As stressed in the econometric literature, pre-filtering destroys the low-frequency range of the spectrum, leading to substantial bias in the responses of the variables to structural shocks. Our analysis shows that if the estimation is carried out in the frequency domain, but employing a sensible band to exclude (enough) contaminated frequencies from the likelihood, the resulting VAR estimates and the impulse responses to structural shocks do not present significant bias. This result is robust to several specifications of the external cycle and data lengths. An empirical application studying the effect of technology shocks on hours worked is provided to illustrate the results. Keywords: Impulse-response, filtering, identification, technology shocks. JEL Classification: C32, C51, E32, E37
    Keywords: Previsió econòmica, Models economètrics, Cicles econòmics, 33 - Economia,
    Date: 2016
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:urv:wpaper:2072/290743&r=ecm
  2. By: Mikio Ito; Akihiko Noda; Tatsuma Wada
    Abstract: A non-Bayesian, generalized least squares (GLS)-based approach is formally proposed to estimate a class of time-varying AR parameter models. This approach has partly been used by Ito et al. (2014, 2016a,b), and is proven very efficient because, unlike conventional methods, it does not require the Kalman filtering and smoothing procedures, but yields a smoothed estimate that is identical to the Kalman-smoothed estimate. Unlike the maximum likelihood estimator, the possibility of the pile-up problem is shown to be small. In addition, this approach enables us to possibly deal with stochastic volatility models and models with a time-dependent variance-covariance matrix.
    Date: 2017–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:1707.06837&r=ecm
  3. By: Rahul Mukherjee (Indian Institute of Management Calcutta)
    Abstract: Recent years have witnessed a significant surge of interest in causal inference under a potential outcomes framework, with applications to such diverse fields as sociology, behavioral sciences, biomedical sciences, and so on. In a finite population setting, we consider causal inference on treatment contrasts from an experimental design using potential outcomes. Adopting an approach that integrates such causal inference with finite population sampling, this is done with reference to a general scheme for assigning experimental units to treatments, along with general linear unbiased estimators of the treatment means. The assignment scheme allows the possibility of randomization restrictions, such as stratification, and unequal replications. We examine how tools from finite population sampling can be employed to develop a unified theory for our general setup. As a major breakthrough, it is shown that unbiased estimation of the sampling variance of any treatment contrast estimator is possible under conditions milder than Neymannian strict additivity. The consequences of departure from such conditions are also touched upon. Our approach applies readily to the situation where the treatments have a general factorial structure.
    Keywords: Finite population sampling, linear unbiased estimator, Neymannian strict additivity, variance estimation.
    JEL: C13 C83 C90
    Date: 2017–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:sek:iacpro:4607283&r=ecm
  4. By: Ryan T. Godwin & David E. Giles (Department of Economics, University of Manitoba)
    Abstract: Recently, many papers have obtained analytic expressions for the biases of various maximum likelihood estimators, despite their lack of closed-form solution. These bias expressions have provided an attractive alternative to the bootstrap. Unless the bias function is “flat,” however, the expressions are being evaluated at the wrong point(s). We propose an “improved” analytic bias adjusted estimator, in which the bias expression is evaluated at a more appropriate point (at the bias adjusted estimator itself). Simulations illustrate that the improved analytic bias adjusted estimator can eliminate significantly more bias than the simple estimator which has been well established in the literature.
    Keywords: bias reduction; maximum likelihood; nonlinear bias function
    JEL: C13 C15
    Date: 2017–07–21
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:vic:vicewp:1702&r=ecm
  5. By: Catherine Hausman; David S. Rapson
    Abstract: Recent empirical work in several economic fields, particularly environmental and energy economics, has adapted the regression discontinuity framework to applications where time is the running variable and treatment occurs at the moment of the discontinuity. In this guide for practitioners, we discuss several features of this "Regression Discontinuity in Time" framework that differ from the more standard cross-sectional RD. First, many applications (particularly in environmental economics) lack cross-sectional variation and are estimated using observations far from the cut-off. This is in stark contrast to a cross-sectional RD, which is conceptualized for an estimation bandwidth going to zero even as the sample size increases. Second, estimates may be biased if the time-series properties of the data are ignored, for instance in the presence of an autoregressive process. Finally, tests for sorting or bunching near the discontinuity are often irrelevant, making the methodology closer to an event study than a regression discontinuity design. Based on these features and motivated by hypothetical examples using air quality data, we offer suggestions for the empirical researcher wishing to use the RD in time design.
    JEL: C14 C21 C22 Q53
    Date: 2017–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:23602&r=ecm
  6. By: Castagnetti, Carolina; Rosti, Luisa; Töpfer, Marina
    Abstract: So far, little work has been done on directly estimating differences of wage gaps. Stud- ies estimating pay differentials, generally compare them across different subsamples. This comparison does not allow to conduct any inference or, in the case of decompositions, to confront the respective decomposition components across subsamples. We propose an exten- sion of an Oaxaca-Blinder type decomposition based on the omitted variable bias formula to directly estimate the change in pay gaps across subsamples. The method proposed can be made robust to the index-number problem of the standard Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition and to the indeterminacy problem of the intercept-shift approach. Using Italian micro data, we estimate the difference in the gender pay gap across time (2005 and 2014). By applying our proposed decomposition, we find that the convergence of the gender pay gap over time is only driven by the catching-up of women in terms of observable characteristics, while the impact of anti-discrimination legislation is found to be negligible.
    Keywords: Pay Gap,Omitted Varibale Bias Formula,Oaxaca-Blinder Decomposition
    JEL: J7 J13 J31
    Date: 2017
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:hohdps:142017&r=ecm
  7. By: Jeremy T. Fox
    Abstract: I prove that the joint distribution of random coefficients and additive errors is identified in a mulltinomial choice model. No restrictions are imposed on the support of the random coefficients and additive errors. The proof uses large support variation in choice-specific explanatory variables following Lewbel (2000) but does not rely on an identification at infinity technique where the payoffs of all but two choices are set to minus infinity.
    JEL: C25 L0
    Date: 2017–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:23621&r=ecm
  8. By: Gloria Gheno (Free University of Bozen-Bolzano)
    Abstract: In economics it is very important to understand the mechanisms which determine the phenomena of interest. For example in marketing it is very important to analyze the factors which determine the future choices of the customer such that it is possible to influence the sales of a product. In most of the economic applications, to make this the researcher supposes the knowledge of the mathematical relations among the variables of interest and in particular these relations are supposed linear. In this work I propose a new estimation method for mediation models without supposing the form of the mathematical relations but aggregating many different equations. My new estimation method derives by Bauer?s work (2005) about the semiparametric approach for SEM (structural equation models). To apply my estimation method, I propose new formulas to calculate the direct, indirect and total effects. I apply my method both to simulated data and to marketing data.
    Keywords: direct effect, marketing, mediation, indirect effect, SEM, semiparametric approach, total effect
    JEL: C40 C14 C15
    Date: 2017–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:sek:iacpro:5007336&r=ecm
  9. By: Fabian Eckert (Yale University); Costas Arkolakis (Yale University)
    Abstract: Combinatorial problems are prevalent in economics but the large dimensionality of potential solutions substantially limits the scope of their applications. We define and characterize a general class that we term combinatorial discrete choice problems and show that it incorporates existing problems in economics and engineering. We prove that intuitive sufficient conditions guarantee the existence of simple recursive procedures that can be used to identify the global maximum. We propose such an algorithm and show how it can be used to revisit problems whose computation was deemed infeasible before. We finally discuss results for a class of games characterized by these sufficient conditions.
    Date: 2017
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:red:sed017:249&r=ecm
  10. By: Daniel Benjamin; James Berger; Magnus Johannesson; Brian Nosek; E. Wagenmakers; Richard Berk; Kenneth Bollen; Bjorn Brembs; Lawrence Brown; Colin Camerer; David Cesarini; Christopher Chambers; Merlise Clyde; Thomas Cook; Paul De Boeck; Zoltan Dienes; Anna Dreber; Kenny Easwaran; Charles Efferson; Ernst Fehr; Fiona Fidler; Andy Field; Malcom Forster; Edward George; Tarun Ramadorai; Richard Gonzalez; Steven Goodman; Edwin Green; Donald Green; Anthony Greenwald; Jarrod Hadfield; Larry Hedges; Leonhard Held; Teck Hau Ho; Herbert Hoijtink; James Jones; Daniel Hruschka; Kosuke Imai; Guido Imbens; John Ioannidis; Minjeong Jeon; Michael Kirchler; David Laibson; John List; Roderick Little; Arthur Lupia; Edouard Machery; Scott Maxwell; Michael McCarthy; Don Moore; Stephen Morgan; Marcus Munafo; Shinichi Nakagawa; Brendan Nyhan; Timothy Parker; Luis Pericchi; Marco Perugini; Jeff Rouder; Judith Rousseau; Victoria Savalei; Felix Schonbrodt; Thomas Sellke; Betsy Sinclair; Dustin Tingley; Trisha Zandt; Simine Vazire; Duncan Watts; Christopher Winship; Robert Wolpert; Yu Xie; Cristobal Young; Jonathan Zinman; Valen Johnson
    Abstract: We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance for claims of new discoveries from 0.05 to 0.005.
    Date: 2017
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:feb:artefa:00612&r=ecm
  11. By: Zeya Zhang; Weizheng Chen; Hongfei Yan
    Abstract: This paper proposed a method for stock prediction. In terms of feature extraction, we extract the features of stock-related news besides stock prices. We first select some seed words based on experience which are the symbols of good news and bad news. Then we propose an optimization method and calculate the positive polar of all words. After that, we construct the features of news based on the positive polar of their words. In consideration of sequential stock prices and continuous news effects, we propose a recurrent neural network model to help predict stock prices. Compared to SVM classifier with price features, we find our proposed method has an over 5% improvement on stock prediction accuracy in experiments.
    Date: 2017–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:1707.07585&r=ecm
  12. By: Luciano Lopez (University of Neuchatel, Institute of Economic Research, Rue Abram-Louis Breguet 2, 2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland.); Sylvain Weber (University of Neuchatel, Institute of Economic Research, Rue Abram-Louis Breguet 2, 2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland.)
    Abstract: This article presents the Stata user-written command xtgcause, which implements a procedure proposed by Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012) for testing Granger causality in panel datasets. With the development of large and long panel databases, theories surrounding panel causality evolve at a fast pace and empirical researchers may sometimes find it difficult to run the most recent tests developed in the literature. In the case of Dumitrescu and Hurlin's (2012) test, it even looks like it has been inaccurately implemented in some programs, and several publications in various fields report incorrect results. These papers may therefore have reached wrong conclusions, which might reveal harmful for instance if policies are designed on such bases. This contribution constitutes an effort to put this empirical literature back on track.
    Keywords: Stata, Granger causality, panel datasets.
    JEL: C23 C87
    Date: 2017–02
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:irn:wpaper:17-03&r=ecm

This nep-ecm issue is ©2017 by Sune Karlsson. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.